2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

**Chico** · 07-11-2016, 10:52 AM

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

This entire FBI 'investigation' has been a disgrace from start to finish. The Director should be indicted for election tampering.

Davis so you reckon no wrong doing has happened? perhaps the CIA director will get re-instated now as well.

**Troy** · 07-11-2016, 10:55 AM

The FBI should have carried out the investigation and only gone public if they had found incriminating evidence. How many 'early' votes were cast with bias due to the public announcement of an investigation?

**AntRobertson** · 07-11-2016, 10:56 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

So should the clinton foundation be investigated,for the Qatari donation that they said they didn't receive though openly admitted yesterday that they did receive it but forgot

Oh great, so now the posts have been shifted from emails to the foundation.

**crocman** · 07-11-2016, 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by crocman

I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.

Not really. The questionable matter to my mind is the timing of the letter and it's vagueness and the decision to proceed contrary to DOJ advice and accepted and settled policy.

The emails could just have been - as was suggested - duplicates of those that were already investigated.

It's telling that there was such a kerfuffle over it to begin with and then comparatively barely a whisper when it was dropped. The whackjobs had already decided she was guilty and are now even using the time of the investigation to impugn some sort of conspiracy.

Meanwhile, still no findings of criminal wrong-doing.

The timing of the conclusion of the investigation is in itself interesting.

Guilty or innocent, the voters are going to the booth having been once again reminded that there has been an investigation.

Will it have an impact?

**Davis Knowlton** · 07-11-2016, 10:59 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

This entire FBI 'investigation' has been a disgrace from start to finish. The Director should be indicted for election tampering.

Davis so you reckon no wrong doing has happened?

There was indeed wrongdoing on a massive scale - by the FBI Director.

**Chico** · 07-11-2016, 11:01 AM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

So should the clinton foundation be investigated,for the Qatari donation that they said they didn't receive though openly admitted yesterday that they did receive it but forgot

Oh great, so now the posts have been shifted from emails to the foundation.

Have you read any of the emails.?

**Chico** · 07-11-2016, 11:03 AM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

So should the clinton foundation be investigated,for the Qatari donation that they said they didn't receive though openly admitted yesterday that they did receive it but forgot

Oh great, so now the posts have been shifted from emails to the foundation.

Tell you what Ant you are blinded by the false patriotism of your country.

**AntRobertson** · 07-11-2016, 11:03 AM

Originally Posted by crocman

Will it have an impact?

Hard to see how it wouldn't.

Which is exactly why Comey should've kept his fat gob closed to begin with. He has definitely influenced the election - it's just a question of degrees and by how much at this stage.

Originally Posted by crocman

Guilty or innocent

Yeah, it's innocent. How many times does that need to be stated.

**AntRobertson** · 07-11-2016, 11:05 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

Have you read any of the emails.?

What on earth has that got to do with anything.

Originally Posted by Chico

Tell you what Ant you are blinded by the false patriotism of your country.

Yeah righto, except I'm not American.

You yet again demonstrate that you are willfully blind to objective fact.

**Storekeeper** · 07-11-2016, 11:07 AM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carla-...12803186.html?

"As recently as last year, Hillary Clinton was polled by the Gallup organization as the world’s most admired woman. That capped a record twenty (20) times Clinton has been so honored. Even Eleanor Roosevelt, the most honored woman of her day, polled fewer times (13) than Clinton. Last year’s honor meant beating out such international icons as Malala (“I am Malala”) Yousafzai, Queen Elizabeth, and Michelle Obama.

Of course, the reputational fall happened because of Donald Trump’s vicious campaign against Clinton for the White House, in which this con artist regularly slimes her as “Crooked Hillary” and “Lying Hillary” and vows, if elected, to put her in jail. The Hillary hatred among Trump supporters, and even among some on the progressive left, is scary. Again, how’d it happen?

I know, I know: the emails. Which was a major mistake on Clinton’s part and for which she has apologized many times (something Trump never ever does, but should). And there was the too-cozy relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton was Secretary. If she wins the White House, the Clinton Foundation will stop accepting foreign donations.

But, people, these several mistakes simply do not rise to the level of Trump’s malfeasance — the bankruptcies that destroyed others while allowing Trump to continue living like a billionaire, the fraudulent and now defunct Trump University, Trump’s non-payment of taxes while ordinary Americans pay their fair share. If Trump wins, the killer issue will have been... Hillary’s emails. Really?

Nor do Clinton’s character flaws equate to anything like Trump’s repugnant behavior — the denigration of Muslims, Mexicans, the disabled, the women he has allegedly assaulted sexually.

Hmmm, denigration of women. Think that has anything with the Hillary hatred...?

Trump has called women “pigs, slobs, and dogs.” He insults Hillary as a candidate: “Does she look presidential, fellas? Give me a break.” (Note his callout to “fellas.”) Saddest are the women blindly babbling their anti-Hillary, anti-woman hatred.

Again, this is the woman who 20 times —20 times— was polled “World’s Most Admired Woman,” while the estimable Eleanor Roosevelt managed it only 13 times.

Tellingly, Hillary Clinton’s 20-time record as world’s most admired woman spans the 30 years of her public life that Trump now derides and points to as abject failure: her years as First Lady, then U.S. Senator, then Secretary of State. To quote the fear-mongering Trump himself, “Something’s going on, folks.”

Something is going on, folks. Trump has manipulated the general discontent of the public and out of it created a dangerous reactionary campaign — against non-white Americans, against foreigners, against women.

Eleanor Roosevelt would weep. Wake up, America".

The author of the article is Carla Seaquist. She lives in Gig Harbor, WA and is the wife of Larry Seaquist, Captain (ret), USN and former Commanding Officer of the USS Iowa.

**slackula** · 07-11-2016, 11:07 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

how long did it take them to search all the new emails.

Instead of rote regurgitation of idiotic right wing talking points why don't you do a little reading and try to stop looking like such a gullible cretin for a change.

It would have taken minutes at most. Ever heard of a thing called PRISM?

Here:

Computer forensics defuses FBI's Clinton email 'bombshell' ? The Register

**Chico** · 07-11-2016, 11:12 AM

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

Have you read any of the emails.?

What on earth has that got to do with anything.

Originally Posted by Chico

Tell you what Ant you are blinded by the false patriotism of your country.

Yeah righto, except I'm not American.

You yet again demonstrate that you are willfully blind to objective fact.

Ok then your just Blind and a Plastic wanna B

by the way all emails are verified by Google

**AntRobertson** · 07-11-2016, 11:15 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

by the way all emails are verified by Google

You don't actually have any idea what you're talking about do you.

You're all over the map.

Originally Posted by Chico

Ok then your just Blind and a Plastic wanna B

And you're a semi-literate multinick.

**MrG** · 07-11-2016, 11:17 AM

^
He's a waste of time.

**bsnub** · 07-11-2016, 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by Chico

So should the clinton foundation be investigated

That should be fun since it is one of the highest rated charities and happens to be completely transparent. But the right wing echo chamber never tells you those facts.

**Cujo** · 07-11-2016, 11:28 AM

Originally Posted by MikeyLikesU

Originally Posted by Cujo

Oh, and by the way.

FBI director: new Hillary Clinton emails show no criminal wrongdoing
James Comey says surprise batch of emails discovered during Anthony Weiner investigation ‘have not changed conclusion’ of inquiry completed in July.
The FBI has determined that a new batch of emails apparently related to Hillary Clinton’s private email server “have not changed our conclusion” that she committed no criminal wrongdoing, FBI director James Comey told congressional leaders in a letter on Sunday.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...al-james-comey

Leaping Lizards....what kind of mushrooms have you been eating?

Hillary is under investigation period. In fact....at least two investigations.
:

Yeah, but no.
Chump on the other hand...........

**Humbert** · 07-11-2016, 12:32 PM

Originally Posted by crocman

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

how long did it take them to search all the new emails.

See that's the thing with you whackjobs: you declared her guilty before the investigation and will continue to do so even now after there has been no criminal wrongdoing discovered or charges laid.

Because whackjobs. And because facts don't matter to whackjobs.

It's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.

In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.

So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.

I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.

650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBI

**RPETER65** · 07-11-2016, 12:36 PM

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by crocman

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

how long did it take them to search all the new emails.

See that's the thing with you whackjobs: you declared her guilty before the investigation and will continue to do so even now after there has been no criminal wrongdoing discovered or charges laid.

Because whackjobs. And because facts don't matter to whackjobs.

It's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.

In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.

So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.

I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.

650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBI

Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.

**Cujo** · 07-11-2016, 12:44 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by crocman

In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second. So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.

More BS coming from the ALT right media. Old white men do not grasp technology. The FBI is not going through 650,000 emails by hand that would be a tremendous waste of time and resources. They will use software that uses an algorithm to search for keywords and phrases. It probably works much like a google web search would.

In today's world do you know how absurd it sounds that there would be an army of FBI agents with massive stack of printed emails going through each one at a time?

and he's not the only one who thinks there's an army of FBI agents poring over each individual email.
Trumptards.

**Cujo** · 07-11-2016, 12:46 PM

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by crocman

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by Chico

how long did it take them to search all the new emails.

See that's the thing with you whackjobs: you declared her guilty before the investigation and will continue to do so even now after there has been no criminal wrongdoing discovered or charges laid.

Because whackjobs. And because facts don't matter to whackjobs.

It's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.

In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.

So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.

I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.

650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBI

Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.

**harrybarracuda** · 07-11-2016, 12:59 PM

Coomey's trying to get out of going to jail innit?

**bsnub** · 07-11-2016, 01:08 PM

Originally Posted by Cujo

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by crocman

In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second. So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.

More BS coming from the ALT right media. Old white men do not grasp technology. The FBI is not going through 650,000 emails by hand that would be a tremendous waste of time and resources. They will use software that uses an algorithm to search for keywords and phrases. It probably works much like a google web search would.

In today's world do you know how absurd it sounds that there would be an army of FBI agents with massive stack of printed emails going through each one at a time?

and he's not the only one who thinks there's an army of FBI agents poring over each individual email.
Trumptards.

You had to know that the village idiot would be along to say otherwise...

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.

**slackula** · 07-11-2016, 01:52 PM

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.

Please read the link I posted in #7599, it explains why it would take minutes at most to know if there was anything new.

**harrybarracuda** · 07-11-2016, 01:53 PM

Originally Posted by bsnub

You had to know that the village idiot would be along to say otherwise...

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.

The village idiot quite obviously watched Hannity.

Neither of the cretins have the slightest idea how Database queries work.

**baldrick** · 07-11-2016, 01:57 PM

Originally Posted by Chico

So how long did it last again.?

educate yourself - the announcement was political and aimed at manipulating the election - the fcuker will face charges

the FBI has a lot of experience doing automated analysis of large data sets and you can be sure it was well completed before the announcement

Computer forensics defuses FBI's Clinton email 'bombshell' ? The Register

Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions