Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yeah see, that's just not factually correct.

That's what it takes to be a Trump supporter: a complete disregard for objective reality in favor of the 'feels'.

Well before you commit to a full time job as forum vigilante, perhaps you should check the facts you fucking babbling doofus!


The truth about the Clintons and Haiti.

That link not only doesn't support what you've stated it directly contradicts it.

Seriously, do you need to fail an IQ test to be a Trump supporter??

Yeah right PeeWee as if you actually took the time to read it!

The Clintons are as dirty as the day is long.

That is a fact, so check that, ya ignorant twat!

Ant, our forum vigilante, what a fucking joke!

Many this thread should be about you, hey PeeWee?

..........................

I did read it Earl. It doesn't say what you claim it does.

And your opinion on the Clintons isn't a fact, it's an opinion.

An opinion for which the only evidence you've offered directly contradicts what you're saying.

Facts matter. Unless you're a Trump supporter.

Originally Posted by david44

Above the froth there will be little change on Wall Steet Main Street.

Neither candidate has any discernable solution to jobs, trade, mortgages, Health Care, overseas wars.

Both are great liars but Hilary has more experience on the International stage and the support of J P Morgan,Wells Fargo,Citibank and Goldman Sachs are the real players.

I doubt there will be any loss of sleep by insurers, arms dealers, big aggro or pharma

I disagree with you there, all the indications are that they are already walking around funny with red eyes and brown trousers. And he has not even won yet.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I did read it Earl. It doesn't say what you claim it does.

And your opinion on the Clintons isn't a fact, it's an opinion.

An opinion for which the only evidence you've offered directly contradicts what you're saying.

Facts matter. Unless you're a Trump supporter.

Well perhaps you did the 2 seconds skim, but given your challenged notion of semantics it is very likely you missed the mark of comprehension by a longshot.

You and good old Bill Clinton seem to share the same handicap.








PeeWee perhaps you should stick to being the DH vigilante, Your are out of your league with the big boys where the big issues are discussed.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Yeah see, that's just not factually correct.

That's what it takes to be a Trump supporter: a complete disregard for objective reality in favor of the 'feels'.

Well before you commit to a full time job as forum vigilante, perhaps you should check the facts you fucking babbling doofus!


The truth about the Clintons and Haiti.

It's gotta be Boon Mee surely. Only a fuckwit on that scale doesn't read the links he posts.

Meanwhile, back in RPETER's zany madcap world of jerking off to republican made-up bullshit:

Fox News anchor Bret Baier apologized on air Friday for his report that Hillary Clinton faces a "likely" indictment as the result of a federal investigation into the Clinton Foundation and for his report that Clinton's private email server had been hacked by five foreign intelligence agencies.

Both of Baier's mistaken reports were made Wednesday night in an appearance with Fox News Channel's Brit Hume. At the time, Baier said the information was based on "two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation."

Baier "clarified" his reporting Friday on the Fox News show Happening Now, hosted by Jon Scott.

"On the hacking of Clinton's private, unsecured server: While multiple sources believe and are operating under the working assumption that the server has been hacked, and some had specific quotes to that belief, there are to this day no digital fingerprints of such breaches," Baier said Friday on the Fox News show Happening Now, hosted by Jon Scott.

Baier admitted the report was based on a single, anonymous source.

He then said his statement that an indictment was "likely" in the investigation into the Clinton Foundation was a "mistake." Baier had already backtracked somewhat the previous night, calling the wording "inartful."

"Well, that just wasn't inartful, it was a mistake and for that I'm sorry," Baier said. "I should have said they will continue to build their case. Indictment obviously is a very loaded word, John, especially in this atmosphere and no one knows if there would or would not be an indictment no matter how strong investigators feel their evidence is."

Several news organizations reported Thursday that Baier's assertion was incorrect.

Fox News anchor apologizes for false report of 'likely' Clinton indictment

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

I did read it Earl. It doesn't say what you claim it does.

And your opinion on the Clintons isn't a fact, it's an opinion.

An opinion for which the only evidence you've offered directly contradicts what you're saying.

Facts matter. Unless you're a Trump supporter.

Well perhaps you did the 2 seconds skim, but given your challenged notion of semantics it is very likely you missed the mark of comprehension by a longshot.

You and good old Bill Clinton seem to share the same handicap.








PeeWee perhaps you should stick to being the DH vigilante, Your are out of your league with the big boys where the big issues are discussed.

So to recap: you've made a factually incorrect claim; the only evidence you provided to support this claim actually contradicts it; so now you're just back to spamming YouTube vdos and declaring yourself the 'winner'.

'K. Like I said that's what it takes to be a Trump supporter: a complete disregard for objective reality in favor of the 'feels'.

You have to wonder if the length of the never-fucking-ending campaign is specifically designed so that at the end, nobody cares which loser wins, just as long as it's over.

Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton

You have to wonder if the length of the never-fucking-ending campaign is specifically designed so that at the end, nobody cares which loser wins, just as long as it's over.

Davis it is just beginning, soon after Trump is sworn in as POTUS and lovely First Lady Melania redecorates the WH, Bill and Hillary Clinton will be going to jail!

John Pilgers full interview with Julian Assange.

Courtesy of RT

https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assan...l-transcript/?

Originally Posted by Chico

John Pilgers full interview with Julian Assange.

Courtesy of RT

https://www.rt.com/news/365405-assan...l-transcript/?

I think the writing credits should go to Vladimir Putin.

holly shit, Trump is seriously back in the polls

BBC have him as 45%, same as Hillary

this just speak volume how much Hillary is hated, despite all the scandals, Trump hasn't given up

Originally Posted by baldrick

the post by miss kitt that is 2 posts above yours

you really lack any credibility on here

Two posts above mine but below the post where I asked for the link. I had not seen Miss kitt's post when I asked for the link, think before you post.

something to make all our Putin fans feel warms and happy again

Russia's Putin unveils provocative statue - BBC News

^Yes, and Russian state television is calling the election rigged. I guess we know who the Kremlin supports. They are laughing at Trump behind his back - 'a useful idiot'.

right, because Hillary is not the useful idiot for Corporations and the war machines ?

Originally Posted by misskit

Ha ha ha. Performance art. What silly wankers those right wing nuts are.

In the UK, when concerns about what Jimmy Savile and his circle of friends were getting up to, began to be voiced were those raising the concerns tagged with a nickname like "wankers" "alt-right" or some such? Were any of his antics excused away as "performance art" or similar?

Just curious...

^Who gives a fcuk about the UK?

Originally Posted by Humbert

Who gives a fcuk about the UK?

Bubba and Hill have some good friends there...

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a backer of Democrats and a friend of the Clintons’, made sure attendees did not grill Mrs. Clinton at the $100,000-per-couple lamb dinner Mrs. Forester de Rothschild hosted under a tent on the lawn of her oceanfront Martha’s Vineyard mansion.

“I said, ‘Let’s make it a nice night for her and show her our love,’” Mrs. Forester de Rothschild said. - NYT

Eyes Wide Shut ...

^Yes, I'm pulling your leg. But it is apples and oranges.

I see Mr Ibomba anyone,today pleading with voters, see the prick is using the southern accent drole again.

Originally Posted by Humbert

^^Yes, I think everyone is pretty well aware that the US is very divided and it will be difficult for anyone to bring the country together. The long term demographic trends in the US point to a gradual sea shift toward progressive political gains resulting inevitably in a Democratic majority in both houses of congress and a Democratic President.

At least the House will stay R this time around and likely the Senate.

The Senate is a close call.

But yes, i agree with you in the future it will be (D) in potus, House and Senate.

Unless, only the R's adapt and recruit like in Texas.

Originally Posted by Humbert

But it is apples and oranges.

Is it really?