Davis so you reckon no wrong doing has happened? perhaps the CIA director will get re-instated now as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton
Printable View
Davis so you reckon no wrong doing has happened? perhaps the CIA director will get re-instated now as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton
The FBI should have carried out the investigation and only gone public if they had found incriminating evidence. How many 'early' votes were cast with bias due to the public announcement of an investigation?
Oh great, so now the posts have been shifted from emails to the foundation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
The timing of the conclusion of the investigation is in itself interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Guilty or innocent, the voters are going to the booth having been once again reminded that there has been an investigation.
Will it have an impact?
There was indeed wrongdoing on a massive scale - by the FBI Director.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicoDavis so you reckon no wrong doing has happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by Davis Knowlton
Have you read any of the emails.?Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Hard to see how it wouldn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by crocman
Which is exactly why Comey should've kept his fat gob closed to begin with. He has definitely influenced the election - it's just a question of degrees and by how much at this stage.
Yeah, it's innocent. How many times does that need to be stated.Quote:
Originally Posted by crocman
Tell you what Ant you are blinded by the false patriotism of your country.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
What on earth has that got to do with anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
Yeah righto, except I'm not American.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
You yet again demonstrate that you are willfully blind to objective fact.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carla-...12803186.html?
"As recently as last year, Hillary Clinton was polled by the Gallup organization as the world’s most admired woman. That capped a record twenty (20) times Clinton has been so honored. Even Eleanor Roosevelt, the most honored woman of her day, polled fewer times (13) than Clinton. Last year’s honor meant beating out such international icons as Malala (“I am Malala”) Yousafzai, Queen Elizabeth, and Michelle Obama.
Of course, the reputational fall happened because of Donald Trump’s vicious campaign against Clinton for the White House, in which this con artist regularly slimes her as “Crooked Hillary” and “Lying Hillary” and vows, if elected, to put her in jail. The Hillary hatred among Trump supporters, and even among some on the progressive left, is scary. Again, how’d it happen?
I know, I know: the emails. Which was a major mistake on Clinton’s part and for which she has apologized many times (something Trump never ever does, but should). And there was the too-cozy relationship between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Hillary Clinton was Secretary. If she wins the White House, the Clinton Foundation will stop accepting foreign donations.
But, people, these several mistakes simply do not rise to the level of Trump’s malfeasance — the bankruptcies that destroyed others while allowing Trump to continue living like a billionaire, the fraudulent and now defunct Trump University, Trump’s non-payment of taxes while ordinary Americans pay their fair share. If Trump wins, the killer issue will have been... Hillary’s emails. Really?
Nor do Clinton’s character flaws equate to anything like Trump’s repugnant behavior — the denigration of Muslims, Mexicans, the disabled, the women he has allegedly assaulted sexually.
Hmmm, denigration of women. Think that has anything with the Hillary hatred...?
Trump has called women “pigs, slobs, and dogs.” He insults Hillary as a candidate: “Does she look presidential, fellas? Give me a break.” (Note his callout to “fellas.”) Saddest are the women blindly babbling their anti-Hillary, anti-woman hatred.
Again, this is the woman who 20 times —20 times— was polled “World’s Most Admired Woman,” while the estimable Eleanor Roosevelt managed it only 13 times.
Tellingly, Hillary Clinton’s 20-time record as world’s most admired woman spans the 30 years of her public life that Trump now derides and points to as abject failure: her years as First Lady, then U.S. Senator, then Secretary of State. To quote the fear-mongering Trump himself, “Something’s going on, folks.”
Something is going on, folks. Trump has manipulated the general discontent of the public and out of it created a dangerous reactionary campaign — against non-white Americans, against foreigners, against women.
Eleanor Roosevelt would weep. Wake up, America".
The author of the article is Carla Seaquist. She lives in Gig Harbor, WA and is the wife of Larry Seaquist, Captain (ret), USN and former Commanding Officer of the USS Iowa.
Instead of rote regurgitation of idiotic right wing talking points why don't you do a little reading and try to stop looking like such a gullible cretin for a change.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
It would have taken minutes at most. Ever heard of a thing called PRISM?
Here:
Computer forensics defuses FBI's Clinton email 'bombshell' ? The Register
Ok then your just Blind and a Plastic wanna B:)Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
by the way all emails are verified by Google
You don't actually have any idea what you're talking about do you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
You're all over the map.
And you're a semi-literate multinick.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
^
He's a waste of time.
That should be fun since it is one of the highest rated charities and happens to be completely transparent. But the right wing echo chamber never tells you those facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico
Yeah, but no.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeyLikesUQuote:
Originally Posted by Cujo
Leaping Lizards....what kind of mushrooms have you been eating?
Hillary is under investigation period. In fact....at least two investigations.
:
Chump on the other hand...........
650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBIQuote:
Originally Posted by crocmanIt's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.
So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.
I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBIQuote:
Originally Posted by crocmanIt's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.
So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.
I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.
Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.
:rofl: and he's not the only one who thinks there's an army of FBI agents poring over each individual email.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Trumptards.
:pat:Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert650,000 e mails in total on the device. 10,000 of interest according to the FBIQuote:
Originally Posted by crocmanIt's a fair question given that there are 650,000 emails.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
In the time that the case was re-opened that works out to about 1email per second.
So either there was an army sorting through these emails, they didn't give them their full attention or they were told to let it roll and then shut it down.
I have no idea which but you must admit it raises more questions than it answers.
Yes but they had to look at all 650,000 to know that.
Coomey's trying to get out of going to jail innit?
Quote:
Originally Posted by CujoQuote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
:rofl: and he's not the only one who thinks there's an army of FBI agents poring over each individual email.
Trumptards.
You had to know that the village idiot would be along to say otherwise...
:smileylaughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
Please read the link I posted in #7599, it explains why it would take minutes at most to know if there was anything new.Quote:
Originally Posted by RPETER65
The village idiot quite obviously watched Hannity.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Neither of the cretins have the slightest idea how Database queries work.
:bananaman:
educate yourself - the announcement was political and aimed at manipulating the election - the fcuker will face chargesQuote:
Originally Posted by Chico
the FBI has a lot of experience doing automated analysis of large data sets and you can be sure it was well completed before the announcement
Computer forensics defuses FBI's Clinton email 'bombshell' ? The Register