Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Stop posting such nonsense as you have, then, and we'll stop debunking it. Then you can finish with self-righteous accusations of "ad hominem attacks". Until then, if you post nonsense, expect to have it described correctly.

Until then, would you mind highlighting the crap in yellow ? That'll make it a lot easier for us to filter out. Thanks for your co-operation.

Originally Posted by ENT

^ and ^^^ and ^^^^....The dumb and the dumber.

There's more intelligence in a bag of hammers than in the collective brain-space of you three.

Post some definitive and verifiable proofs or facts re. 9/11 instead of persistently indulging in ad hominem crap, then others might take you seriously.

You are incapable of accepting facts.

That's what makes you such a fucking clown.

Who on earth seriously believes every single major news station not only has delayed feeds but inserted, or had inserted, video, that happened to completely coincide with what eye witnesses (who were on the phone live as it happened) saw?

Only a completed deluded, brain dead twat, that's who.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Stop posting such nonsense as you have, then, and we'll stop debunking it. Then you can finish with self-righteous accusations of "ad hominem attacks". Until then, if you post nonsense, expect to have it described correctly.

Until then, would you mind highlighting the crap in yellow ? That'll make it a lot easier for us to filter out. Thanks for your co-operation.

Christ no! That's lot of yellow in his case..

Originally Posted by ENT

Like that bit of engine wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?
The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

Engine wing?... what is an engine wing ENT?

I seem to remember it was part of an undercarriage, or something like that, but don't let's get bogged down with petty details eh...

....but then, whatever it was, how could such a thing have come from a projected image of a plane?......I'm with you ENT.... Those spooks are capable of trying on anything. Imagine going around dumping bits of Boeings all over the place. Do you reckon they just picked it up at some local scrapyard? It's almost as bad as faking all those planes crashing into buildings and fields without actually using any planes.

Good thing we have folks like you and Dok of Prison Planet to set the records straight and keeping world a more truthful place......

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You are incapable of accepting facts.

Facts?

Like that bit of engine wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?

The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

The one that the US secret service goons didn't clear out after the show on 9/11?

The one you and other jerks kept on crying and blubbering over as if it was a religious relic?

Hilarious. "Engine wings" are ENT's "facts".

What about the wheel wings, ENT ?

Originally Posted by koman

Originally Posted by ENT

Like that bit of engine wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?
The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

Engine wing?... what is an engine wing ENT?

I seem to remember it was part of an undercarriage, or something like that, but don't let's get bogged down with petty details eh...

....but then, whatever it was, how could such a thing have come from a projected image of a plane?......I'm with you ENT.... Those spooks are capable of trying on anything. Imagine going around dumping bits of Boeings all over the place. Do you reckon they just picked it up at some local scrapyard? It's almost as bad as faking all those planes crashing into buildings and fields without actually using any planes.

Airplane wing, I stand corrected.

It was in fact a piece of a Boeing, a trailing edge flap actuation support structure., according to Boeing.

But it wasn't from AA11 or UA175, it was just a piece of stage prop left behind by the goon squad.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You are incapable of accepting facts.

Facts?

Like that bit of airplane wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?

The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

Boeing identified it as a 767 component, there was just no identifying mark to narrow it down to a particular aircraft.

But since both planes were 767's what difference does it make?

You're the only idiot that thinks it wasn't from either.

More to the point, you're the only idiot that thinks there is some kind of reason to go planting aircraft parts in gaps between buildings on which other parts were found after the event.

There are even photos on this thread.

You really are just a fucking idiot, clutching at the most impossible of straws all the time.

You are retarded.

But he's retarded with WINGS, Harry. There IS a difference

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767.

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

And I suspect the locals might have noticed if they had.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767. When the parts were found there were ropes attached to it that indicated the parts to have been lowered in to place. No one has come forward to say they placed it there.

Maybe some one attached ropes beforehand and then took a photograph so it appeared some one had lowered them into place, no one knows and no one will ever know ,in a real court of law such "evidence" would be laughed out of Court

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

All it indicates is some one tied a rope or ropes to the Aircraft part ,other than that its just pure speculation in the eyes of the law as to just what it indicates as its pure circumstantial.

So now we have it that 9/11 conspiracy people found it first and entwined a rope within it to make it look as if it was placed there. Okay, whatever.

Authorities are exploring the possibility that the part was intentionally placed, as Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said a piece of rope was found wrapped around the wreckage.
"Somehow the part gets down there, could it have been lowered at some time? It's possible. There's a rope that's on it, looks like it's intertwined with that part," Kelly said.

- See more at: Police: Part of plane destroyed during 9/11 attacks found in alley - Time Warner Cable News

I Rule Nothing in and nothing out , but to suggest that the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it proves that it was some how an inside job ,is frankly delving into the realms of fantasy

Originally Posted by piwanoi

the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it

It wasn't tied to it. It was "interwined" indicating that it was put on before it arrived at its location. Hence why the police treated it as a crime scene.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

If you read all the post it would tell you that a rope was found attached to the plane part. Indicating that it was lowered in to its location.

So what? There was aircraft debris cleaned off the roofs of several buildings in that area.

So someone tried to lower it down and gave up?

Big fucking deal.

Again, this has already been covered.

All this shitheap of a thread does is go round in circles.

You can repeat ad nauseam:


1. <ENT posts shit>

2. "ENT that's shit".

3. <ENT posts more shit>
4. <Shaggy, his little bum chum, posts even more shit>

5. "Look Fellers, that's all shit".

Repeat steps 3, 4 and 5.

Give it a few more pages and some tosser will be posting Pentagon videos again.

Or even worse, bringing out General Stubblebine as an expert witless ....er....I mean witness.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You are incapable of accepting facts.

Facts?

Like that bit of airplane wing found behind the Islamic centre near WTC?

The one that DIDN"T come from any crashed airliner on 9/11?

Boeing identified it as a 767 component, there was just no identifying mark to narrow it down to a particular aircraft.

But since both planes were 767's what difference does it make?

You're the only idiot that thinks it wasn't from either.

More to the point, you're the only idiot that thinks there is some kind of reason to go planting aircraft parts in gaps between buildings on which other parts were found after the event.

There are even photos on this thread.

Lots of p-hotos, none of a piece of hijacked airliner though.

Boeing knew the parts numbers, but couldn't hang the bits on AA77 or UA175 as they didn't match.

So there's a great deal; of difference, otherwise differentiation wouldn't be part of intelligence, as is apparently not the case in your simplistic way of thinking.

Once again, you think that only the great ENT thinks that parts were planted at WTC,....., well, go have a look outside of your glass walled world and your favourite news feed you'll find that most people accept that there was a full on scam on 9/11, right down to planted "evidence" that quickly got spirited away and no more heard of.

Crikey, you're some stupid idiot thinking that the official story's got any sense to it,....no proof, no evidence that stands up to scrutiny, nothing that proves that a bunch of ragheads with less than adequate training hikacked and crashed four airliners on 9/11.

But of course, there will always be people like you and Latindancer and koman and Floridaborn (talk about birds of a feather ) who will always suck up to the official line, fascistic authoritarian bunch with inadequate egos neding authoritarian dogma and guidance for security.

Simply, fascists.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

The part Ent is referring to was possibly from one of the 2 planes. It cannot be truly identified as being part of either aircraft other than it was a piece from a 767.

There's no "possibly" about it, unless you have secret evidence of other 767s that have crashed in that area.

And I suspect the locals might have noticed if they had.

Dopey twat.

Originally Posted by ENT

But of course, there will always be people like you and Latindancer and koman and Floridaborn (talk about birds of a feather ) who will always suck up to the official line, fascistic authoritarian bunch with inadequate egos neding authoritarian dogma and guidance for security.

Simply, fascists.

I would _LOVE_ to expose any wrongdoing by authorities. That is what originally kept me posting on this thread ....there are in fact some interesting anomalies and coincidences.

But after continually examining the evidence with a critical eye, and listening to the mind-numbing idiocy that conspiracy theorists put out, I cannot see anything else having happened except what was described in the official story......same as Noam Chomsky.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by piwanoi

the Aircraft part with a rope tied to it

It wasn't tied to it. It was "interwined" indicating that it was put on before it arrived at its location. Hence why the police treated it as a crime scene.

"When police officers first responded to the report of wreckage behind 51 Park Place last week, one of the officers used rope that he found on the ground nearby to wrap around the aircraft part in order to move it in such a way as to look for its serial number or other identifiers."

[UPDATE] 9/11 Plane Wreckage Wedged Between Buildings Is A "Trailing Edge Flap": Gothamist

Originally Posted by Latindancer

....there are in fact some interesting anomalies and coincidences.

Such as?

Just watched "In Plane sight" Hmmmm?