Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

We concluded that the plane impact to the Pentagon generated relatively-weak seismic signals.(**)



There is no clear seismic signals which can be associated with the airplane crash into the Pentagon.

They were relatively weak, that is all. What else do you expect from a building purposely constructed to absorb impact ?

Waddya mean, "They were relatively weak, that is all."? Bollix! That was not all!!

Palisades Observatory stated;
"There is no clear seismic signals which can be associated with the airplane crash into the Pentagon."

Isn't that clear enough?

Further, from the same report;

"There appears to be strong seismic signals around 09:38:52 at station MVL (Millersville, Pa; Δ = 139 km), but the signals are too high frequency (5-10 Hz)and too high amplitude (328 nm/s at 139 km).


Hence, it appears be noise perhaps due to electrical disturbances.

Otherwise, there are no clear and consistent seismic wave arrivals in this time window."


The signals indicated a possibility of some form of electrical disturbance, but not enough to indicate that an airliner crashed into the building or the ground there,.... nothing of any comparable magnitude, thus relatively weak...relative to an aircraft impact.

If an airliner impacting the solid earth can give a clear signal, relatively weak signals indicate hardly a smack on the ground.
In this instance at the Pentagon, there's strong indication of a rigged explosive device, hence the electrical activity picked up.

Whatever blew up inside the Pentagon blew up above ground level, as indicated by the hole blown upwards into the second floor of the second ring wall in.