Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

If you tell me what thermite is made of, maybe I will.

You don't seem to know, or are VERY unwilling to answer that question. Why is that?

And give your own interpretation of what actually happened at the Pentagon.


ENT has actually PROVEN himself repeatedly to be a liar.

Yoo hoo, ENT - what's thermite made of?

Oh, and how about a personal and reasonable account of what you feel happened at 9/11? You know, what LD has only been asking for several days for.

It's quite obvious that ENT is a pathological liar - why else do you think he's a "truther"?

Hey, how about that Obama birth certificate, that pharma industry, the vaccination cover-up, and the Roswell Aliens...?

^Professional troll.

ENT, well-known troll, admits guilt through projection.

Originally Posted by ENT

The stories of 503 men and women is 12,000 pages, the most comprehensive on-the-scene report of what happened that day.

The consistent theme was of hearing, feeling and seeing explosions,
A controlled demolition.

Failure to officially acknowledge this evidence is further proof of an inside job by government,

He narrowed down the testimony of 118 interviewsas especially court-worthy testimony.

Firstly I would say that considering there where many thousands of first responders on the fire ground that 500 odd ain't earth shattering news that they would surmise it was a controlled demolition given the way the Towers fell.

First responders are not structural engineers and opinions can differ at any fire scene. Hence why we have an independent fire investigation team.

A small amount of responders hold the controlled demolition theory. Its there opinion, can we take it as fact?

Of course not same as ENT'S silly statements that neither a plane or a missile hit the Pentagon. Got to be either one or the other and it certainly was not the other.

Break it down to 118 and it ain't looking good up against the vast majority of responders who totally disagree with them.


Pathetic stuff ENT.

Originally Posted by terry57

why fly jets onto the Towers when there was no need to at all considering the Yanks do what the fuk they want to do anyway ?

It's called Public Opinion Terry -

Originally Posted by ENT

“A New Pearl Harbor”

Two years ago a project set up by the men who now surround George W Bush said what America needed was “a new Pearl Harbor.” Its published aims have, alarmingly, come true.

Ok ENT, The Feds needed to kill all those citizens so they could embark on world domination.

What has actually happened to America since 7/11 ?

They enter Afghanistan and finally killed Bin-laden, but at what cost. The loss of many of there own troops, there economy is fuked and Afghanistan is still a living breathing shit hole with billions of dollars wasted in the process. In other words fuk all has changed.

They got Saddam in the Middle East, big fuking deal, who gives a fuk, nothing has changed there much either. Still killing and maiming each other in the name of religion.

Actually they should of just let them all fuking off each other and minded there own business.

The US is shithouse at that though sadly.

So your blinding theory is that The US destroyed the Twin Towers so they could have a new " Pearl Harbor."

Fuk me, at least they won that one thank fuk for us Aussies but have made some awfully bad decisions afterwards. They certainly did not need to destroy the Twin towers to sully there reputation as they can do that all by themselves just by letting Bush lose near a microphone.

But in saying that I'm glad there on our side.

You Muppet ENT, Anyway whats next in your little book of fantasy.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

A controlled demolition.


is YOUR INTERPRETATION.

You're not used to looking at THE BARE FACTS, are you ???? The bare facts are that there were loud noises.
.
.
.

The facts are indeed there where loud noises and a controlled demolition is the Conspiracists opinion.

Worthy of fuk all innit.

Why was the evidence of first responders to the WTC was omitted by the 9/11 Commission?

Why did GW Bush say that bombs were planted at WTC?

Why did Silverstein give the order to "pull" WTC 7?

Why did NIST refuse to look for evidence of explosives at ground zero WTC?

Why was all the evidence of the WTC disaster immediately removed and disposed of?

Why did Chenney say that a missile struck the Pentagon and that the plane was shot down over Shanksville?

Why did GW Bush say that another Pearl harbour was needed?

Why was NORAD conducting a nation wide exercise involving the flying of airliners into buildings on 9/11?

Your information and reasoning is a load of shit Terry.

Originally Posted by terry57

Ok ENT, The Feds needed to kill all those citizens so they could embark on world domination.

No Terry, it's about money.

Originally Posted by terry57

What has actually happened to America since 7/11 ?

Lot's of fat people and sated stoners??

Originally Posted by terry57

They enter Afghanistan and finally killed Bin-laden, but at what cost. The loss of many of there own troops, there economy is fuked and Afghanistan is still a living breathing shit hole with billions of dollars wasted in the process. In other words fuk all has changed.

Yup horrible kunts what they didi to their own.

Originally Posted by terry57

They got Saddam in the Middle East, big fuking deal, who gives a fuk, nothing has changed there much either. Still killing and maiming each other in the name of religion.

Got the oil though eh?

Originally Posted by ENT

Why did GW Bush say that bombs were planted at WTC?

Originally Posted by ENT

Why did Chenney say that a missile struck the Pentagon and that the plane was shot down over Shanksville?

Originally Posted by ENT

Why did Silverstein give the order to "pull" WTC 7?

Originally Posted by ENT

Why did GW Bush say that another Pearl harbour was needed?

And all those numpties saying

"Surely it would have leaked out, someone must say something, someone must talk""

..er yes - IT'S STARING YOU IN THE FUCKING FACE FROM THE LEADERS OF THE CHARADE!

Originally Posted by terry57

Originally Posted by ENT

The stories of 503 men and women is 12,000 pages, the most comprehensive on-the-scene report of what happened that day.

The consistent theme was of hearing, feeling and seeing explosions,
A controlled demolition.
Failure to officially acknowledge this evidence is further proof of an inside job by government,

He narrowed down the testimony of 118 interviewsas especially court-worthy testimony.

Firstly I would say that considering there where many thousands of first responders on the fire ground that 500 odd ain't earth shattering news that they would surmise it was a controlled demolition given the way the Towers fell.

First responders are not structural engineers and opinions can differ at any fire scene. Hence why we have an independent fire investigation team.

A small amount of responders hold the controlled demolition theory. Its there opinion, can we take it as fact?

Of course not same as ENT'S silly statements that neither a plane or a missile hit the Pentagon. Got to be either one or the other and it certainly was not the other.

Break it down to 118 and it ain't looking good up against the vast majority of responders who totally disagree with them.


Pathetic stuff ENT.

Also, bear in mind, he's not saying 500 or 118 firemen said it was a controlled demolition, or explosions even. He's hand-picked accounts tat best corroborate his and ENT's delusions about explosions. If you actually read those statements IN CONTEXT of the quotes that were hand-picked and isolated from context, the vast majority simply say quotes like "it sounded like explosions as the floors were collapsing" and "the forces of the pancaking floors sounded like explosions" - and in no way imply or speculate on "controlled demolitions".

In fact, a lage number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

How can that be, for something coming from "truthers"?

Originally Posted by ENT

Your information and reasoning is a load of shit Terry.

Good bloke though - takes a mean picture

Oh, ENT - thermite?

How about it?

Or are you saying there was no thermite?

^^Maybe, but he's not a fireman.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

In fact, a lage number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

Give a reference for that.

Originally Posted by ENT

Why was the evidence of first responders to the WTC was omitted by the 9/11 Commission?

Why did GW Bush say that bombs were planted at WTC?

Why did Silverstein give the order to "pull" WTC 7?

Why did NIST refuse to look for evidence of explosives at ground zero WTC?

Why was all the evidence of the WTC disaster immediately removed and disposed of?

Why did Chenney say that a missile struck the Pentagon and that the plane was shot down over Shanksville?

Why did GW Bush say that another Pearl harbour was needed?

Why was NORAD conducting a nation wide exercise involving the flying of airliners into buildings on 9/11?

Hyperbole.

hy·per·bo·le (h-pûrb-l)n.

1) A figure of speech in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect, as in I could sleep for a year or This book weighs a ton.

2) (Literature / Rhetoric) a deliberate exaggeration used for effect..." he embraced her a thousand times"

3) An extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as "to wait an eternity".

4) An obvious and intentional exaggeration.

.
.
.

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Oh, ENT - thermite?

How about it?

Or are you saying there was no thermite?

What about your nano-termites, still feeding them?

Several types of thermite are used.
The simplest formula for a thermite is one made of FeO2 (rust) and Al (aluminium powder).

^^Still trying to improve your English, LD?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

In fact, a lage number of those questioned after the fact about their alleged statements refute those allegations, and confirm that they are being quoted out of context or never even said what is attributed to them.

Give a reference for that.

^ Why bother, you won't read it or even click on it, again, as you always do.

You'll just declare it "LIES!"

You're the only one who lies here, so far - consistently.

Originally Posted by ENT

The simplest formula for a thermite is one made of FeO2 (rust) and Al (aluminium powder).

Really?

Gee, I wonder if any of that *might* be found, on its own, in a collapsed steel building, that an airliner flew into?

Can you think of that?