9/11 was an inside job

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 12:28 PM

Do your research, wannabe, then yak.

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 12:40 PM

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

Ok, now we're getting somewhere.

So you are saying that the point circled in red is where the nose of the plane hit?

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 01:06 PM

Correct.The official claim is that the "plane" hit that point, then slid under the first floor slab, through Rings E, D and C, passing through 6 walls.

That theory is a load of bolix, as the Pentagon has explained the punch hole that is most publicised, as being one of three holes punched through by Pentagon engineers to vent smoke from Ring C fires and to facilitate search and rescue and firefighing.The early claims were that a punch hole (the much publicised "round hole" picture) was made by either the nose cone or the starboard engine of a Boeing, are both false.

The point indicated by a red arrow and circle in the pic.could not have been the point of contact of either a plane or a missile either, as the floor slab is still intact behind the facade.

If anything had hit that point and exploded, there would have been a seismic reading showing both P and S waves, but only S waves were recorded at the claimed moment of impact, hence no grounded explosion.

There were two explosions reported by witnesses.

I have found the records for one explosion so far and will post the data for the other asap.

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 01:14 PM

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 01:24 PM

Hey, ENT, so how about your educational and informational background? It seems I keep asking the same question.

Oh, wait, I AM, because you are scared to answer. I do love it when people with embarrassing educational backgrounds are put on the spot and waffle when asked.

So, what's the matter ENT, Shaggy - cat's got your tongues?

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 01:34 PM

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

So you are saying that the point circled in red is where the nose of the plane hit?

Right around there - maybe 10 degrees lower.

Did you bother looking at the physics and numbers of the WTC impact, and how much energy was transferred to the building?? Apply the same numbers here.

Oh, and look:

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 01:37 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

I have found the records for one explosion so far and will post the data for the other asap.

Oh, right, like all those other promised data "will post asap", that everyone is still waiting for.

... including your's and Shaggy's educational backgrounds.

Your continued silence starts to confirm, and convince me, that you don't actually have any real education to speak of, either of you.

C'mon, make us laugh - at least something like "the school of life", or some such nonsense.

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 01:48 PM

^^There are two problems with the claims in that video.
First, shock waves follow the path of least resistance, so exited via holes in the front of the pentagon D Ring.

Secondly,the vid. ends with the famous "round punch hole" that has been proven to have been made by Pentagon engineers.

Both statements are invalid.

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 01:55 PM

Yoohoo!

How about your's and Shaggy's educational backgrounds?

Why are you hiding from this question?

It seems everytime a question demands you to release and confront facts, you hide away from it.

Funny. Really.

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 01:56 PM

You just shot yourself in the foot again quack-quack.

After you run that video, you get to four more.
The bottom left video, "Deconstructing the Pentagon Attack"video gives the gen. of why it was impossible for the airliner reported by eye-witnesses to have
a) been on the "official'' flight path, nor
b) to have hit the Pentagon.

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 02:51 PM

Yoohoo!

How about your's and Shaggy's educational backgrounds?

Why are you hiding from this question?

It seems everytime a question demands you to release and confront facts, you hide away from it.

Funny how I always stumble upon these questions that terrorize you, isn't it?

Funny how you and Shaggy keep pretending it's not being asked. I will keep throwing it in your face until you answer - or until everyone sees you for the liar and coward you are.

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 03:00 PM

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 03:15 PM

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 03:34 PM

So, ENT buddy, what about that educational background? What's your's? You too, Shaggy?

You keep evading that question. Why is that?

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 03:36 PM

(I think we all know why that is, don't you agree?)

**Cujo** · 27-06-2012, 04:06 PM

To be honest I really don't think it's any of your business.

**Latindancer** · 27-06-2012, 04:55 PM

EMP got his degree in Anthropology whilst incarcerated in a mental health clinic.
Albert became a brickies labourer after leaving school in grade 10, and made a little money dealing drugs to his mates. Now lives on unemployment benefits and sits at home stoned and watching tv most of the day.
Here's a book for you, Albert.

**Cthulhu** · 27-06-2012, 05:03 PM

Originally Posted by Koojo

To be honest I really don't think it's any of your business.

Oh, it sure is. The qualifications of those wildly spouting extraordinary claims have become ths thread's (or my) business, the moment EMP and Shaggy questioned qualifications and educational backgrounds of myself and others criticizing and questioning their theories and conclusions - and while they ridiculed and demanded to know, and others have been forthcoming, somehow you feel the same doesn't apply in reverse to them?

It does.

**Butterfly** · 27-06-2012, 06:40 PM

is Quack Quack the new SoCal ?

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 07:07 PM

Pentagon explosions and casualty reports

There were no dead reported and only 26 reported injuries, according to one nurse interviewed.

Witnesses report several explosions after the fire was put out and Pentagon engineers had collapsed the damaged section 40 mins. later.

Other witnesses give their accounts of what they saw, a bit of a mix.

But, there is another fire burning, well north of the initial explosion and fire zone.
Also, what's that white smoke machine doing there?

Watch this.

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 07:30 PM

Originally Posted by ENT

Good find mate.

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 07:32 PM

Originally Posted by Butterfly

is Quack Quack the new SoCal ?

Come on man - Socal's a bit retarded but that's going a little far

**Albert Shagnastier** · 27-06-2012, 07:39 PM

Originally Posted by Cthulhu

The qualifications of those wildly spouting extraordinary claims have become ths thread's (or my) business

Ok dude - chill.

I went......

to a school.

(It wasn't a special school like you went to though Rain Man)

**ENT** · 27-06-2012, 07:59 PM

A bit of a wanker that quack-quack, ain't he. Intersting forum, this one, room for all sorts.
You can see how birds of a feather etc works though. eh?

Right through this thread the two total dickheads, Cthulhu and Latindancer have behaved like a pair of tarts on heat.

I don't know which one is the biggest moron, Cthulhu with his nano-termites and calculations of telephone signal speed to Mars and claims of being experienced in all sorts of science when he uses a word like scientistic!!

] Or is it LD. proving his superiority by claiming to have done high school physics, and his mentos and diet coke theory, for krisake!

His last big dribble of an essay on kinetic energy involved in plane crashes here he reckoned he'd break his arm if he punched a wall too hard got me cracking up. The martial artist who studies style.

At least I can get a laugh out of him ,eh.

**Latindancer** · 27-06-2012, 08:17 PM

The forum fuckwit mouths total crap. No surprises here, except that his sidekick Dim Albert has returned.

View Poll Results: Was 9/11 an inside job - 2016 TD poll

Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions