Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by ENT

You asked a question about those pics of plane parts and I answered
There's no scale to judge by, so I can't know , can I?

So, what about the fire and smoke damage on that nice clean cut north wall of the collapsed section, and on the aircraft debris scatter on the lawn?

Regards the Plane parts in that building, got fuk all to do with any scale,we don't need one as they are the official pics taken at the site.

Your not suggesting they are false are you ? Once again you disregard the bleeding obvious and tend to believe in fairies.

Regards the other part of your question, cant see any problem there at all.

"Regards the other part of your question, cant see any problem there at all."

Meaning?

Terry mate.

I appreciate that you save life and limb in the city of Perth and you are a regular top geeza, but you got this call wrong dude.

Originally Posted by ENT

You're trying to be a prize prick Terry, just stick to the topic if you've got any answers.

No I'm not. You know my style.

I'm presenting answers to you in plain English and presenting credible evidence of why your theory's are a tad on the mad side.

Jeezus, how much more evidence do you need of a plane crashing into the Pentagon than the friggin pictures of the remains.

We have the pictures but have fuk all evidence of your missile except your crap links you post which consist of opinions and zero fact.

Exactly the same scenario as the Corby thread.

Your confusing our evidence with your conspiracy theory. You guys have nothing credible except rhetoric and personal opinions.

In a court of law you'd be banged in jail whilst I'd be set free to have a nice drink down the Pub with people that make sense.

Hence why not one person has never come forward with any evidence that can actually hold water and support your theories.

Now stop crying will ya and man up a tad.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Terry mate. You got this call wrong dude.

I think I'll stay firmly in the court that suggests and shows evidence that a plane did indeed hit the pentagon.

11 years on, no evidence to prove any different, never will be.

Unburnt?

There's a fucking great big hole in the side!

^

Haven't seen it so don't know what your on about.

Is it any more compelling than having the photos of the plane parts in the building ?

I'll bet ya the pics are better than your what your on about.

Originally Posted by Moonraker

Unburnt?

There's a fucking great big hole in the side!

Oh that's what ENTS on about. Fuk me EH. Jessus Christ.

L
Seems that you're blind as well as stupid Terry.

Originally Posted by ENT

Where's the plane?

Have another look at the unburnt north wall of the collapsed section of the Pentagon.

The left side of that section Terry, the one opposite your right.

Nice clean cut, innit Terry?

------

Latindancer : As a mattter of fact, I studied Okinawan Karate before Bruce Lee became famous. Then continued with other styles.But as for the simple mechanics of building collapse, it really _IS_ Popular Mechanics stuff" latindancer re. WTC 911.

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by ENT

Where's the plane?

Have another look at the unburnt north wall of the collapsed section of the Pentagon.

The left side of that section Terry, the one opposite your right.

Do you mean the un-burnt section on the left that is almost black in places where it has been burnt?

Originally Posted by ENT

Nice clean cut, innit Terry?

Sure is to the vast amount of reasonable people ENT.

11 years suggest nothing new to the contrary has surfaced except the conspiracy dudes banging on as usual.

They gain no extra followers though except those who have held the theory from the get go.

Actually there followers have declined as they have come to realize that pigs just don't fly after all.

In other words, Terry, you can't answer a reasonable question, because you're scared.

There was a good Ozzer, Kevin Bracken, came to prominence a couple years ago when he got on the public radio show hosted by a split-tongued ziojoo, and Bracken tried to make the case for 9/11 Truth. UK's Anthony Lawson does a nice job recapping the exchange here,



ALawson did a follow up vid following some of the Oz gummit fallout,



Kevin Bracken came to San Francisco and gave this talk about the outcomes of 9/11 and the accompanying War On Terror Hoax, as it pertained to THE WORKING PEOPLE. I got blustery eyed in parts, as did Bracken.

Architects & Engineers:

Solving the Mystery of
World Trade Center Building 7

Oh yes I'm shitting my self that you might possibly be correct and pigs do actually fly.

I'll have a look at your Vid tomorrow and get back to you. Another piece of footage that will prove fuk all as usual.

Originally Posted by Moonraker

Do you mean the un-burnt section on the left that is almost black in places where it has been burnt?

Almost black in places, is right.

And the clean cut is just that, a clean cut.

Not something caused by fire, but a regular, clean, pre designed and measured cut.

Not anything caused by fire or explosion at all.

Just a nice professional dismantling of one side of that section of the building, before the fire was put out.

Originally Posted by terry57

Actually there followers have declined as they have come to realize that pigs just don't fly after all.

Neither do 19 untrained Arabs with box cutters.

Here we go again, I remember this one from before.

ENT....... How the fuck did somebody manage to cut a whole in the side of the pentagon without being noticed?

What hole are you on about, there were several.

You know exactly what I mean but are just trying to get out of answering the question.

Just had a look at the footage. Whats so riveting and earth shattering about that for fuk sakes ?.

The North wall is unburnt because the wind was blowing to the south away from the North structure. Strong wing by the looks of it pushing the flame and heat to the south.

The plane has disappeared into the building so one cant see any remains of the plane and the building has collapsed onto its self through heat and fire.

Standard sort of stuff that happens when such a flagellation occurs. Absolutely fuk all unusual in that. Ive seen that result many times in intense fires where one side of a building appears unmarked.

Is that what you regard as world class evidence that a missile hit the pentagon ?

Get friggin real mate.

Originally Posted by ENT

What hole are you on about, there were several.

What a load of wank. There was one massive fuk off hole. Are you blind as well as insane ENT ?

Originally Posted by ENT

And the clean cut is just that, a clean cut.

Not something caused by fire, but a regular, clean, pre designed and measured cut.

Not anything caused by fire or explosion at all.

Just a nice professional dismantling of one side of that section of the building, before the fire was put out.

You fuking nut case ENT.

Buildings can collapse like that when faced with severe and devastating impact.

Suppose some fuker got up there with a quick cut saw and sliced through the whole section of that building just before your missile hit it.??

Go to bed for fukes sake and dream about those pigs flying will ya.

Actually the more imaginary evidence you dream up the more friggin stupid you become, exactly the same as the Corby thread.

Unbelievable mate.