Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

That's orite then innit?

Anyway, the thing is, them ragheads that were supposed to be on the AA Flt 77 weren't on it!

Even the 9/11 commission said so!

Tell all you know.

Check out post # 2884 and ALL the refs.

Originally Posted by ENT

Nope.

Anyway, back to topic. Who d'ya think dunnit wide boy?

Old news ENT- here are the 19 Al Qaeda terrorists who are responsible for 9-11


Guess you don't read the news much...

Originally Posted by ENT

them ragheads

What's a raghead?

Originally Posted by Gilbert

Tower 7 was weakened by fire and it fell of it's own accord.

^ Was this fire started by a 450,000 lb airplane crashing through the building?

Hey ENT, why don't you write a book on it

Are you gonna watch the 5 hour doco leemo?

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Originally Posted by ENT

them ragheads

What's a raghead?

Not tellin ya, peckerwood.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Originally Posted by ENT

Nope.

Anyway, back to topic. Who d'ya think dunnit wide boy?

Old news ENT- here are the 19 Al Qaeda terrorists who are responsible for 9-11


Guess you don't read the news much...

Um wanna buy a bridge, cracka?

Originally Posted by ENT

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Originally Posted by ENT

them ragheads

What's a raghead?

Not tellin ya, peckerwood.

Is a peckerwood the same as an ENT?

Originally Posted by sabang

Hey ENT, why don't you write a book on it

Are you gonna watch the 5 hour doco leemo?

I've watched and read and heard enough, will probably do more of all three, but still not convinced it was an inside job. Maybe there's something wrong with me, and the billions of others that don't see the troof.

It must be all the fluoride in the cool aid.

Or possibly you've taken too much lobelia (on top of the alcohol etc etc)

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Take for instance ENT's assertion that the plane which hit the Pentagon at such a speed should (by his calculations) have been wrenched sideways by it's wing hitting the building. Never mind that by the time any substantial part of the wing had hit, a large part of the plane had already entered the building and the entire weight of the plane was driving it forwards .
Others are pointing out the sheer lunacy and lack of logic in this kind of thing and putting forward very well-reasoned debate.

ENT isn't exactly one of the "logical and reasoned" debaters, either. The idiot just redded me for this post (together with insult, of course). I guess he can't refute the logic, so has to rely on childishness.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

^ Was this fire started by a 450,000 lb airplane crashing through the building?

Sorry - but I think in your attempt to appear knowledgeable and cool you have misunderstood something. Tower 7, this is referring. You know, the one that had a professional demolition done on it, that the owner tried to get a double insurance payment from, that only had a couple of fires in it burning at relatively low temperatures, had no accelerant, and then, after the owner told the fire chief to "pull it", referring to group of firemen, collapsed in a free fall exactly as a demo'd building does. You know, the one that the BBC said had collapsed whilst it was still behind the reporter? The one that the fire crew and most people near too it said they heard explosive charges sheering the steel structure. The one that was not mentioned in the 9/11 commission report? The one that, and this might blow your mind, was not hit by an air plane.

Ring a bell?

You appear to know nothing unless you have typed the work "debunk" into google in front of it, and are rather too intellectually challenged to question what you read from the NeoCon funded propaganda sites you rely on.

Isn't there a thread about One Direction that your vast expertise would be best suited to?

Originally Posted by Gilbert

The one that the fire crew and most people near too it said they heard explosive charges sheering the steel structure.

Dilbert (if you are indeed a real person and not a multinic created by ENT, or perhaps one of his friends), what people heard were internal pieces of building failing. It is a fairly common phenomenon. They simply interpreted these noises as explosions.

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

Old news ENT- here are the 19 Al Qaeda terrorists who are responsible for 9-11


Guess you don't read the news much...

It appears you missed where ...


Saeed Alghamdi, a Saudi Pilot, is found alive and well bemused at his name and photo showing that he flew Flight 93.

Waleed Al shehri left the US a year before, and is alive and well. He's in Casablanca, Morocco, again trying to make people believe is alive and well.

Saeed Al-Ghamdi is still flying as a pilot for Tunis Air. Would be hard for him to do that if he was dead in a fire ball the twin towers

Ahmed Al-Nami - alive and well. Never even had a passport, and had never heard of Pennsylvania where the plane was hijacked

Salem Al-Hazmi did not fly into the Pentogram. Sorry, Pentagon. He was at work in the petrochemical plant that he was employed at in .... friend of the US... Saudi.

Khalid Al-Mihdhar was interviewed by an arab newspaper before he went into hiding having been named as a flight 77 terrorist.



So....those men had their identities stolen, that is for sure....but who was it because it was not these men. If it was they are pretty amazing people to survive that.

Guess you don't read the news much...

Originally Posted by Latindancer

ENT isn't exactly one of the "logical and reasoned" debaters, either.

The point where Mad Uncle ENT places himself dead center in the " fuking Idiot bucket " is at the point where ENT totally believes that the Twin towers where not hit by planes and it all was a hologram ?

I mean who can actually believe anything other than ENT is in serious need of mental help, EH ENT.

Love this thread ENT, fooking brilliant entertainment.

Originally Posted by terry57

Twin towers where not hit by planes and it all was a hologram ?

That is a bit far out, and to be fair, it would be a complete waste of time to set that type of stuff up even if they could.

But who were the hijackers? Not the poor fools who had their identities stolen. These guys knew secrets about US radar coverage that frankly was a highly kept military and government secret .....

Originally Posted by Gilbert

But who were the hijackers? Not the poor fools who had their identities stolen.

If one spends 5 seconds thinking about it maybe the highjackers decided to pick some other punters name and use a forged passport in that name.

Makes a tad more sense than what ENT consistently throws up which is born out of too much crack cocaine use.

To really believe the Government pulled of some massive scheme to down those towers is complete insanity and only someone who believes in the tooth fairy would take that stance.

look at the tower 7 debate. For a controlled demolition to be pulled off successfully the towers had to fall as too cover up the gig.

If the planes did not hit the towers and the towers fall into a steaming pile of shit they would not of been able to cover up the demolition and it would not of happened.

Do you really believe the USA Government where good enough to pull of such a large scale plan like that and at the same time keep all involved quiet for twelve years so far.

There has never been one person put his hand up and say , " I was involved in planning the demolition of WTC 7. "

Why is that ? Because it never fuking happened that way.

Terrorists like to keep it simple, not take chances like " maybe we can do this if we do that. "

The scenarios that played out that day where far to complex to actually be controlled by one agency.

An impossible scenario to actually plan. The perfect storm in other words.

Originally Posted by terry57

look at the tower 7 debate. For a controlled demolition to be pulled off successfully the towers had to fall as too cover up the gig.

It would take two people a couple of week putting the charges in place. Anyone who knew could have been lured into the twin towers to their death. Who placed the charges? Real terrorists that, as you know are funded by the CIA in Syria right now, who think they are being geniuses but in fact the red carpet is laid out for them, just before they are taken out perhaps? Perhaps it was supposed to be hit by the other plane that crashed short.

Originally Posted by terry57

Do you really believe the USA Government where good enough to pull of such a large scale plan like that and at the same time keep all involved quiet for twelve years so far.

No. The Us Government had to cover it up. The same way that the US government has sent thousands of US service men and women to their deaths in phoney wars on behest of their money men. The same the government is caught out lying to protect corporate and elite interests on a weekly basis.

As shown earlier, it is possible for only one person to pull it off if they did it correctly. However, you are dealing with a group of people who put 500,000 kids in Iraq to death with a decade of sanctions - they do not care and do not judge their moral value with your own. They will never tell and everyone else is dead.

Originally Posted by terry57

The scenarios that played out that day where far to complex to actually be controlled by one agency.

Not that complicated really. Rig up three towers with controlled explosives. Trick a load of terrorists that you fund and own to steal identities that you give them, set them up and off they go. When the planes hit, the charges are blown, the towers falls. They would not have fallen with out the charges because basically that defies physics and basic 101 engineering.

Originally Posted by terry57

controlled by one agency.

Why are you confusing Government with these agencies. The government does what it is told. Most legislation is written by the money men and pushed through by their politicians. They would need the hijackers, a red carpet for them to get onto the planes, a few sundry people dying in accidents or in the towers, and they are away clean and the government passes the Patriot Act, written before hand, and attacks Iraq and Afghanistan, as predetermined, with the other powerful lobby telling them to attack Iran, Lybia and Syria. At the same time, the bankers cleaned up with billions by betting that the AA share price would plummet....a couple of days prior to their planes crashing into the TT.

It's all doable and pretty easy when you control the government and all it's agencies. Sorry but I do not have the answers, but I know that the answers in the official commission were fabricated. From the very moment those planes hit, the government lying machine started covering it up.

Originally Posted by Gilbert

They would not have fallen with out the charges because basically that defies physics and basic 101 engineering.

Absolute untruth there in your statement. Your quoting from a book maybe but know nothing of the real life situation on the fire ground.

I have witnessed personally the pancake effect in building collapse where supporting girders are effected and weakened by fire.

For the layman its unbelievable but for the professional its an ever present risk when dealing with fire ground situations.

Any front line professional will tell you that fire and steel girders do not make for a safe environment. A fire fighters worst nightmare having to enter into that enviroment.

As a matter of fact the vast majority of fire fighters who die are caught in this very scenario hence why a smart commander will only send his men into that environment if there is life involvement.

Once steel reaches a certain temperature its structural strength is doomed, it will fall.

Regards the rest of your post, you are kidding and don't really believe that tripe.

Originally Posted by Gilbert

Originally Posted by TonyBKK

^ Was this fire started by a 450,000 lb airplane crashing through the building?

Sorry - but I think in your attempt to appear knowledgeable and cool you have misunderstood something. Tower 7, this is referring. You know, the one that had a professional demolition done on it, that the owner tried to get a double insurance payment from, that only had a couple of fires in it burning at relatively low temperatures, had no accelerant, and then, after the owner told the fire chief to "pull it", referring to group of firemen, collapsed in a free fall exactly as a demo'd building does. You know, the one that the BBC said had collapsed whilst it was still behind the reporter? The one that the fire crew and most people near too it said they heard explosive charges sheering the steel structure. The one that was not mentioned in the 9/11 commission report? The one that, and this might blow your mind, was not hit by an air plane.

^ Ah, you're talking about WTC 7? My bad. At 47 stories it's never been called a "Tower" before, but regardless of your mistake it makes no difference.



You can parrot the debunked conspiracy talking points all you like, but fact is, WTC 7 suffered extensive structural damage when the nearby Towers fell and there were multiple fires that burned unchecked on multiple floors for hours before the building finally collapsed.



As if the structural damage and the fires weren't bad enough, according to the official FEMA report: "WTC 7contained 10 transformers at street level, 12 transformers on the 5th floor, and 2 dry transformers on the 7th floor." - FEMA report

The official report concludes: "Even without the structural damage, WTC 7 would have collapsed from fires."

You conspiracy nuts say that the sound of explosions proves that WTC was purposefully demolished but you seem to ignore what happens when a building full of transformers is allowed to burn for 7 hours...

Doesn't take a genius to know that if you let a building burn long enough eventually it's gonna collapse. I like the dude a :57 "I told you that sucker was gonna go!"

^

Just a tad more information on noises emitting from a building fully engulfed by fire.

Every thing involved in a burning building will create its own sound foot print, there are thousands of different compounds which will cry out when there there tolerance to heat has been reached.

A large fire sounds like hell released at its peak, the noises being emitted are quite incredible.

Take the intensity of the fires on that day and anything is possible.

Fire loads within those building would of been huge. Once again the layman would never understand that.

ENT likes to bang on that WTC 7 was partially stripped out.

Big fuking deal ENT, there was still a massive amount of shit left to burn.

Sort of stuff that can only be understood by professionals who have experienced it.

Fuking ENT and his holograms and black ops, Fuk me EH.