Quote Originally Posted by larvidchr View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Sir Wilson View Post
^^ do you actually realise how scary that comment is Lardy? Different laws for different people, what a mockery of the entire underpining of the western legal framework.

You are making judgments about the person as justifications for extraditing them to the US and you can be sure that the US considers him to be worse than an international terrorist and thus it is perfectly alright to send him there for possible execution.

Quote Originally Posted by dobella View Post
but i hope Assange gets raped in the US for being a cocky, above any law and letting personal details out that COULD cause serious damage to world relations.
And this is the elephant in the room that the likes of Lardy are refusing to acknowledge.
You do not even understand my comment or you would not have made this post Willy.

There can be indeed very distinct differences on refused Asylum seekers with no invite that have entered your country illegally, and is sent back to what was mistakenly and in good faith thought to be reasonable safety in their homeland, if that is what Helge is on about ??, to even debate the issue we would have to know the whole story.

But it is no way near the same as a criminal forcefully brought to Sweden and jailed, and then later with law in hand deliberate and knowingly extradited to a death sentence in a foreign nation, and any speculation that this could happen to Assange is pure unadulterated untrue rubbish.

And don't even try to wipe other posters views of on me Monkeyarse, just stick to what I have posted if you must comment on my posts, still don't expect to get an answer from me, I rarely if ever take you seriously.
So that's a no then?

Anyway I think you've drunk enough tonight Lardy, even taking your language skills into account you're still not making sense.

But tell me, why are you so convinced that the US considers him no ill will?