Thread: Ahmadinejad re-election sparks Iran clashes.

Ahmadinejad re-election sparks Iran clashes


Thousands of angry protesters have clashed with police after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was declared the winner of Iran's presidential poll.

Secret police have been attacked, while riot police used batons and tear gas against backers of Mir Hossein Mousavi, who called the results a "charade".

Correspondents say the violence is the worst seen in Tehran in a decade.

In a televised address to the nation, Mr Ahmadinejad thanked voters for giving him a "great victory".
He said the election had been "completely free".
Meanwhile, Mr Mousavi urged his supporters to avoid violence, reports the AFP news agency.


John Simpson Reporting from Tehran


A crowd of about 3,000 attacked the police, some of whom were on motorbikes, which they set on fire.
The sky was thick with black smoke. Police attacked the crowd with sticks and maybe teargas.
I didn't expect to see people turning on the secret police. We were filming when we were surrounded by angry secret policemen. The crowd turned on them and chased them off.
I suspect we are not looking at a revolution but there is serious anger. It all depends on how the government responds - if they use violence, that could inflame the situation.

"The violations in the election are very serious and you are right to be deeply hurt," he said in a statement on his website.
"But I firmly call on you not to subject any individual or groups to hurt."

The official results gave Mr Ahmadinejad 63% of the vote against 34% for Mr Mousavi.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei praised the high turnout of 85%, described the count as a "real celebration" and called for calm.
"Enemies may want to spoil the sweetness of this event... with some kind of ill-intentioned provocations," the ayatollah said.

Mr Mousavi's supporters said the election had been stolen and vowed to seek a re-run.
But observers say this will have little chance of success.
Some of the protesters in Tehran wore Mr Mousavi's campaign colour of green and chanted "Down with the dictator", news agencies report.

Four police motorbikes were set on fire near the interior ministry, where votes had been counted, the BBC's John Simpson in Tehran says.
Interior Minister Sadeq Mahsouli warned that any demonstrations needed official permission, and none had been given.

One opposition newspaper has been closed down and BBC websites also appear to have been blocked by the Iranian authorities. The AP news agency reports that mobile phone services have been blocked in Tehran.

winning more than 50% of the vote, in order to force a run-off election.

Danger of 'tyranny'

Mr Ahmadinejad said the world, especially the Western media, had waged a campaign of "psychological warfare" against the people of Iran during the election.


"It was clear what the majority of people wanted," he said.
He said the people of Iran wanted justice, development, an end to corruption and for their country's name to be respected.

But Mr Mousavi, a former prime minister, said: "I personally strongly protest the many obvious violations and I'm warning I will not surrender to this dangerous charade. "The result of such performance by some officials will jeopardise the pillars of the Islamic Republic and will establish tyranny."


IRANIAN ELECTION
<LI class=bull>Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: 62.6% <LI class=bull>Mir Hossein Mousavi: 33.8% <LI class=bull>Mohsen Rezai: 1.7% <LI class=bull>Mehdi Karroubi 0.9% <LI class=bull>Turnout: 85% Source: Interior ministry


Mr Mousavi had said there was a shortage of ballot papers and alleged that millions of people had been denied the right to vote.
His election monitors were not allowed enough access to polling stations, he added.

The BBC's Jon Leyne in Tehran says the result has been greeted with surprise and with deep scepticism by many Iranians. The figures, if they are to be believed, show

winning strongly even in the heartland of Mr Mousavi.

The scale of Mr Ahmadinejad's win means that many people who voted for a reformist candidate in the previous presidential election four years ago have apparently switched their votes to Mr Ahmadinejad, he adds.

However, the president does enjoy the support of many of the urban poor and rural dwellers.
"I am happy that my candidate has won - he helps the poor and he catches the thieves," sandwich seller Kamra Mohammadi, 22, told AFP.
Mr Mousavi gains much of his support from the middle classes and the educated urban population.

Surge of interest
BBC Iranian affairs analyst Sadeq Saba says the result means that hope for peaceful reform in Iran may die for a long time.

There had been a surge of interest in

with unprecedented live television debates between the candidates and rallies attended by thousands.

There were long queues at polling stations on Friday, with turnout reaching 85%.
Four candidates contested the election, with Mohsen Razai and Mehdi Karroubi only registering about 1% of the vote each.

known as Velayat-e Faqih, or "Rule by the Supreme Jurist", who is currently Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

It was adopted by an overwhelming majority in 1979 following the Islamic revolution which overthrew the autocratic Western-backed Shah.
But the constitution also stipulates that the people are the source of power and the country holds phased presidential and parliamentary elections every four years.

All candidates are vetted by the powerful conservative-controlled Guardian Council, which also has the power to veto legislation it deems inconsistent with revolutionary principles.



Story from BBC NEWS:
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Ahmadinejad re-election sparks Iran clashes

Published: 2009/06/13 20:38:03 GMT

© BBC MMIX

BBC NEWS | Middle East | Ahmadinejad re-election sparks Iran clashes

Originally Posted by woodenshoe

In 2000, Madeleine Albright, US Secretary of State, said that intervention by America in the internal affairs of Iran was a setback for democratic government. This anti-democratic coup d’état was "a critical event in post-war world history" that destroyed Iran’s secular parliamentary democracy, by re-installing the monarchy of the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, as absolute ruler, replacing an elected native democracy with a pro-foreign monarchic dictatorship. The coup is widely believed to have significantly contributed to the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which deposed the pro-Western Shah and replaced the monarchy with an anti-Western Islamic Republic.

wiki..

If you are trying to point out that given their history of mistakes in Iran the Americans have to play this one very carefully, you are correct. Backing Mousavi openly would probably not have the intended effect. This does not mean that the US or Europe should recognize the Ahmadinnerjacket government as legitimate.

A curious irony of all this is that the right wingers in the States and Israel were openly hoping for an Ahmadinejad win. The right wing are nothing if not perverse.