Thread: John Coleman thinks manmade weather change is bullshit

Dont know why it duplicated the entrys,, maybe my fault,, but they are good just dont look at all of the duplicates

As my old grandad used to say. "It will either rain, or go dark before morning."

He's right.

That and the fact that it is warmer here than has been in years before, which in turn means more water evaporation, which goes into the atmos. which in turn makes it hotter as water in the air is what tends to hold heat in when mixed with CO2,, and then the cycle continues,,

kind of like wiping your ass on a hoop..

Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife

Better yet look at the view from the other end of the telescope and check out the IPCC reports and the list of scientists that have contributed.

But first, check out the God Father of the INTERNET and the carbon ideas that fuel the IPCC, read past earth history and look for yourself and for Christs Sakes, use your head and do not do the Thai thing.
It has been getting warmer for 15000 years or there would still be a land bridge to Asia from Alaska to Siberia and there would be hugh sheets of ice still in northern north America.

Blackgang, with all due respect, John Coleman is old news, Al Gore is old news.
The debate has moved on regarding global warming away from the fearmongers and detractors and onto implementing programmes to combat the man made effects, based on scientific fact.

This argument is just sooooo last year.

Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife

This argument is just sooooo last year.

well watch the vids I posted and then check who stands to make the most money from this bunch of bullshit, and global warming is a fact, but man has nothing to do with it,,

Well i just watched the first one.. emotive language from the beginning... "should we blame this child..?" "the IPCC wants to put mankind on trial.."

It is government and industry that are being brought to task, so why start with such rhetorical mumbo jumbo if they want to make a good case?

Dr David Legates, the central protagonist in this documentry;

He is best known for his contrarian opinion on the causes and effects of global warming. Legates opposes the consensus scientific opinion on climate change, and was a signer of the Oregon petition,

"The Union of Concerned Scientists published a study listing Legates among several scientists it described as "familiar spokespeople fromExxonMobil-funded organizations" that have regularly taken stands or sponsored reports questioning the science behind climate change warnings."[

Professor Legates has acknowledged that humans have a direct impact on the environment,

In February 2007, Delaware governor Ruth Ann Minner wote a letter to Legates stating "Your views on climate change, as I understand them, are not aligned with those of my administration,". The letter directed Legates to stop using his title as state climatologist of Delaware in his public statements related to climate change

David Legates - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dr Legates' rebuttal to Dr. MacCracken's declaration. Legates is a known climate skeptic who has been associated with several right wing institutions paid by ExxonMobil.

Declaration of Dr. David Legates | Greenpeace USA

It then states that the IPCC report based it's findings on one set of data only, that of doubling CO2, that's simply not true as the IPCC report was an accumulation of data from all participating countries looking at many aspects of climate change, human impact and pollution in their own enviroment.

The NordGrip data is interesting as it shows we are living in an interglacial period, but it doesn't discredit the IPCC in any way regarding our recent period and the effects of man made pollution.

The documentary says "recent warming may be a consequence of leaving the recent mini ice age.."

may be not is.

That's about enough for me, I don't see them offering any hard scientific data on mans effects on the climate, which is after all the issue at hand.
The emotive opening and the use of a climatologist sponsered by Exxon, shows that this is not an informed, impartial or balanced documentary.

It is opinion and all opinions are welcome in a debate, but I'm not convinced by the methods or the motivation of the documnetary makers in this case.

Cheers anyway. It's always better to have both sides of the argument.

Originally Posted by ItsRobsLife

Dan has simply pointed you in the direction of some perfectly sound scientific studies that you should be aware of, such as those commissioned by the IPCC and carried out by scientists that are experts in their fields, the findings are impartial and factual.

They're all riding the UN gravy train, not exactly impartial. And their facts are based on computer modeling, it'll chuck out whatever answer you want depending on what info you put in.

Originally Posted by Plan B

They're all riding the UN gravy train.

And their facts are based on computer modeling.

Proof? Links? Articles?

^ You could start with the links BG provided, and after that you can you look them up your goddamn self.

No, no please you go first I insist.

Originally Posted by blackgang

If the debate over climate change is closed, why is John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, still trying to prove it’s all a scam?

Well over a quarter-million weathercasts—that’s the ballpark figure the 74-year-old founding father of the Weather Channel guesses he’s probably performed in his 55 years in the business. Today, as for the past 15 years, he’s chalked up another weathercast like it’s his job, because it is. This, he tells me, is the best time of his career.
Which seems odd, because in the past few years, he’s admittedly become mad as hell. Coleman is angry because he believes we have been brainwashed into thinking we’re ruining our own planet. He wants to let us off the hook, and give us some good news for a change, because, you see, John Coleman says that climate change is a scam

GOOD » You Don’t Need a Weatherman»

Let me guess its all the fault of a Cow farting somewhere in North Dakota.

If its F$%&ed up more than likely Man Did It.

no sun spots again

Doomsday 'looming' as Sun goes blank sparking ice age fears

DOOMSDAY could be looming as planet earth faces an ice age after the Sun went blank for the second time in less than month.

Astonishing images from NASA reveal no visible sunspots are currently visible on its surface.
This has caused the star to go into "cue call" mode having entered its quietest period for more than a century, Vencore Weather claims.
Decreased activity is not unusual as solar activity changes the volatile star's surface in 11-year cycles, astronomers say.
But researchers are warning this current cycle could have a devastating impact on Earth's atmosphere, possibly ushering in a second ice age, similar to the one which began in 1645.


Paul Dorian of Vencore Weather says the blank Sun is a sign that the next solar minimum is approaching.
He said: "At first, the blankness will stretch for just a few days at a time, then it’ll continue for weeks at a time, and finally it should last for months at a time when the sunspot cycle reaches its nadir.
"The next solar minimum phase is expected to take place around 2019 or 2020."
The Sun went completely spotless on June 4 with activity remaining low for several days.
It came after another period of low activity in February when NASA images showed the sun in "cueball mode"


CE AGE: The sun is in its quietest period for more than a century


Now experts predict the low solar activity could pave the way for a "Maunder minimum" phase, where solar flares are non-existent, causing temperatures to plummet.
Last year a Northumbria University study predicted a sharp decline in solar activity between 2020 and 2050.
Professor Valentina Zharkova, who conducted the research, said: "I am absolutely confident in our research.
"It has good mathematical background and reliable data, which has been handled correctly.
"In fact, our results can be repeated by any researchers with the similar data available in many solar observatories, so they can derive their own evidence of upcoming Maunder Minimum in solar magnetic field and activity."

Ice age fears triggered after sun 'goes blank' due to low solar activity | Daily Star

4 years to get loads of firewood in back home.

Might save a bit on the A/C bill?

PEA/EGAT will be happy as the dams are a bit low.