They're not actually. Most international airlines now follow the US model of "First" and "Coach", with essentially two cabins, Business and Economy.
The exceptions are very long haul on some routes and the A380 which is being phased out.
Even Qatar Airways only do Biz and Pleb cabins on DOH-LAX.
Maybe you don't see that sitting in row 53.
T’way Air to begin flights between Seoul-Incheon and Chiang Mai
Another airline is to join the glowingly popular Seoul-Incheon/ Chiang Mai route with South Korean airline T’way Air to begin flights on the route before the end of the year.
The airline, previously known as Hansung Airlines, is a low-cost airline based in Seoul. The airline runs a fleet consisting exclusively of Boeing 737-800 aircraft.
“Within this year, we plan to expand [to] the Incheon-Chiang Mai and Incheon-Hong Kong routes to better meet rising demand in the regions,” a T’way Air official told The Korea Times.
National carrier Korean Air currently flies the route with Jeju Air, another low-cost carrier having started servicing the route in September.
The demand to fly to destinations such as Chiang Mai by South Koreans is being fueled by an ongoing dispute between the country and Japan that has seen Koreans abandoning travel to Japan for other destinations.
108,776 passengers from South Korea flew into Chiang Mai International Airport in 2016, the last year numbers are available.
https://chiangmaione.com/tway-air-to...hiang-mai-5034
Got stuck behind half a dozen old Korean chaps in the Exchange at the Night Bazaar once.
They were cashing Bt1,000's in piles a foot thick.
I don't know if that was for Karaoke or what but they seemed to be looking forward to their trip.
Boeing pushed FAA to relax 737 MAX certification requirements for crew alerts
"In 2014, Boeing convinced the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to relax the safety standards for the new 737 MAX related to cockpit alerts that would warn pilots if something went wrong during flight, according to documents reviewed by the Seattle Times. Seeking an exception, Boeing relied on a special FAA rule to successfully argue that full compliance with the latest federal requirements would be “impractical” for the MAX and would cost too much."
The document with the "normally" required compliance struck through with red lines.
More here;
https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...r-crew-alerts/
A tray full of GOLD is not worth a moment in time.
Add another 737model, type NG this time.
Boeing’s 737 in another pickle
By Bjorn Fehrm
"October 1, 2019, ©. Leeham News: The FAA has issued an Air Worthiness Directive (AD) for high time Boeing 737 NGs, requiring immediate inspections for cracks in their wing attachments called pickle forks.
The cracks were discovered on high time aircraft which were torn down for conversion to freighters. The affected 737 types are NG only; the MAX and Classic have a different wing attachment design. The P-8 Poseidon, a derivative of the NG, also is unaffected."
pickle forks = Part of the fuselage hoops bolted to the wing connection box.
More at
https://leehamnews.com/2019/09/30/boeings-737-in-another-pickle/
![]()
It just goes to show that they should have designed a wholly new fit-for-purpose aircraft and not tried to squeeze more blood out of a 50+ year old stone.
JATR study “damning” to Boeing, FAA, New York Times says
Oct. 11, 2019: The international study group that was named to examine the certification of the Boeing 737 MAX and the MCAS system was issued today.
https://leehamnews.com/2019/10/11/ja...rk-times-says/
The New York Times obtained an advance copy. It wrote that:
"A breakdown in the nation’s regulatory system and poor communication from Boeing compromised the safety of the 737 Max jet before it crashed twice in five months and killed 346 people, according to a damning report released Friday.
Boeing did not adequately explain to federal regulators how a crucial new system on the plane worked, the report says. That system was found to have played a role in the accidents in Indonesia last October and Ethiopia in March.
The Federal Aviation Administration relied heavily on Boeing employees to vouch for the safety of the Max and lacked the ability to effectively analyze much of what Boeing did share about the new plane, according to the report by a multiagency task force. The system of delegation is now being scrutinized by lawmakers in the wake of the tragedies.
Boeing employees who worked on behalf of the F.A.A. faced “undue pressures” at times during the plane’s development because of “conflicting priorities,” according to the report.
“This report confirms our very worst fears about a broken system,” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, said in an interview. “To put the fox in charge of the henhouse never made any sense, and now we see the deeply tragic consequences.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/11/b...g-737-max.html
The full study may be downloaded here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...019-FINAL.html
Appears to be a comprehensive enquiry with root and branch recomendations. If instigated worldwide by all certifying agencies and plane manufacturers.
Lots of comments on the Leeham news site.
Many suggesting other Boeings are equally questionable. Also whether the other certifying agencies, globally, are currently more or less opaque.
A limited number are still asserting, Boeing test pilots from an "exceptional country" across the Pacific, have had no problems flying them, after being briefed on what they will be testing the next day [so far].
Short SWA and Ryanair?
Last edited by OhOh; 12-10-2019 at 06:15 PM.
Vietnam Airlines to offer in-flight wifi service
Hanoi (VNA) – National flag carrier Vietnam Airlines will offer wifi services in some of its flights starting from October 10, becoming the first Vietnamese airline to do so, announced the carrier on October 7.
Passengers will be able to access the service in Vietnam Airlines’ flights using Airbus A350 in the air routes linking Hanoi with Ho Chi Minh City, Shanghai, Osaka; and Ho Chi Minh City with Osaka and Singapore.
At a price between 2.95 - 29.95 USD, passengers can choose suitable packages with a maximum capacity of 80 MB.
From the launch of the new services to the end of this year, the carrier will offer 30 minutes of free wifi which enables passengers to send text messages during their flights.
The airline will work to offer the service in other Boeing 787 and Airbus A350 aircraft with faster speed in the coming time.
Earlier, Vietnam Airlines was the first to provide wireless-streaming services on its Airbus A321neo fleet.
It is now operating 94 routes to 21 domestic and 29 international destinations with an average of 400 flights per day, connecting the world’s major cities to travel destinations in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Myanmar.
National News Bureau Of Thailand
Whoa there, take it easy Vietnam Airlines!At a price between 2.95 - 29.95 USD, passengers can choose suitable packages with a maximum capacity of 80 MB.
Chinky parasites at it again. Mind you we all know that's how they fast-tracked the project. Thank fuck the thing is more dangerous than a 737MAX.
A coordinated cyber espionage campaign running over several years helped China to acquire intellectual property needed to design and build its own C919 airplane.
That's according to a report by CrowdStrike [PDF], which claims that this particular cyber espionage campaign was part of China's coordinated effort to bridge the technology gap in the aviation industry and to help the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (Comac) build its C919 airplane.
According to CrowdStrike, the ambitious hacking operation also saved billions of dollars for the Asian giant by copying technical details of the components that were eventually used in the C919 airliner.
The development of China's Comac C919 twinjet aircraft was started in 2008, and after several delays, the plane finally completed its first maiden flight in 2017. Although C919 is touted as a China-made airliner, it uses a large number of components supplied by aerospace companies from North American and Europe.
According to CrowdStrike, between 2010 and 2015, its researchers tracked a Chinese hacking group it dubbed Turbine Panda, which carried out a series of cyber attacks against a number of hi-tech companies, which supplied components for C919 plane.
The report claims that the responsibility to carry out the operation was on Jiangsu Bureau (JSSD), which was selected by the Ministry of State Security (MSS) for this particular operation.
To coordinate cyber espionage efforts, JSSD selected two lead officers: one was tasked to recruit insiders working at foreign aviation firms, while the other was in-charge of the hacking team (Turbine Panda).
Between 2010 and 2015, Turbine Panda group successfully breached C919 suppliers, including Safran, Capstone Turbine, Ametek, Honeywell, GE, and others. It deployed malware, such as PlugX, Sakula, and Winnti, on their machines, which was then used to search for intellectual property and exfiltrate their trade secrets to remote servers.
In some cases, insiders were also used to plant malware, such as Sakula, on targets' networks, largely via USB drives.
In 2016, after about six years of persistent hacking, the Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC) unveiled a new home-made CJ-1000AX engine that was set to replace the C919 engine from CFM.
According to CrowdStrike, the CJ-1000AX engine showed many similarities to the LEAP-1C and LEAP-X engines produced by CFM International, the foreign contractor that supplied turbine engines for the C919.
CrowdStrike researchers believe it is likely that Comac and the Aviation Industry Corporation of China "benefited significantly from the cyber efforts of the MSS [Ministry of State Security], knocking several years and potentially billions of dollars off of its development time."
US authorities have arrested at least four individuals so far in connection with China's hacking aero-industry campaign.
One of them is Xu Yanjun, the officer who is thought to have been in-charge of recruiting insiders at targeted aerospace firms.
Yu Pingan, the developer of the Sakula malware, was arrested by FBI in 2017, while he was attending a security conference in the US.
https://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news...espionage-c919
Qantas tests passenger limits — and pilot brain patterns — on world’s longest nonstop flight
Key Points
- The 20-hour New York-Sydney nonstop will be the world’s longest flight.
- Qantas pilots will provide urine samples and wear brain-monitoring devices to test fatigue levels.
- Boeing and Airbus haven’t yet developed aircraft modifications to perform the 20-hour flight with a full payload.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/18/qant...st-flight.html
I did the 16.5hr DOH-LAX a couple of years back and it wasn't as bad as I thought it would be. I slept the first 5, and then spent the rest watching movies (bring your own!), eating, catnapping and doing a few laps of the cabin occasionally to stretch the legs. I purposely avoided looking at the clock and when they announced we were commencing descent coming down the West coast, I was surprised at how quickly it had gone. Landed early afternoon, so we had a lengthy stroll around Long Beach that night to give the circulation a good run out as well.
Mind you I was waking up ridiculously early for almost a week.
Thai Airways at risk of closure, president says
Thai Airways International (THAI) president Sumeth Damrongchaitham said on Tuesday that staff must cooperate with the airline's rehabilitation efforts because it is in a crisis and faces possible closure.
He sent his message to THAI executives during a training session at the airline's headquarters.
"Today I want staff to be united to overcome the obstacles. Otherwise, the national airline must close down. There is still time for a solution, but there is not much time," Mr Sumeth said.
He said that THAI had lost its market leadership on several routes to competitors, citing northern routes that had generated a third of THAI's revenue but were now dominated by low-cost airlines.
"The competition is very fierce this year," Mr Sumeth said. "THAI is really in a crisis. Next year it must do its best. If staff are still unaware and do nothing, they will not have enough time to fight back. Today very little time remains.
Today there is no comfort zone. Everyone will die if the vessel sinks," .
THAI would cut costs by reducing the salaries of managerial staff and following a zero inventory policy at its catering department, he said.
"There will be no other rewards for the staff, because the top prize is the survival of the company," Mr Sumeth said.
In the first half of this year, THAI posted a loss of 6.44 billion baht, raising its accumulated loss to 280 billion baht. It employs more than 20,000 people.
https://www.bangkokpost.com/business...president-says
Lion Air accident report is hot off the press.
An interesting read....
That should raise a big red flag.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...nd-pilot-errorThe report also found that a critical sensor providing data to an anti-stall system had been miscalibrated by a repair shop in Florida and there were strong indications it had not been tested during installation by Lion Air maintenance staff.
Lion Air should have grounded the jet following similar faults on the plane’s previous flight, the report said, adding that 31 pages were missing from the airline’s October maintenance logs. Lion Air did not respond to a request for comment.
^ Having correctly identified the problem immediately after take-off, neither crew carried out the correct memory items to establish recovery. That's a basic training failure to add to the design failure.
It is why I don't fly with the cheap monkey airlines, preferring well trained pilots to cheap tickets, good entertainment or even good food.
The "critical" sensor was only critical, due the Boeing designed, installed, MCAS system on the 737 MAX, not on non MCAS planes.
Were the supplier aware of it's "criticality"?
Was there a big warning sign,
"NOT TO BE FITTED TO SINGLE AOA BOEING 737 MAX AIRCRAFT?"
Should the supplier be held responsible?
Was the engineer aware of it's "criticality"?
"WAS THEIR A WARNING "NOT TO USE UNLESS THE "PREFERRED TEST GEAR WAS UTILISED?"
"UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES FIT THE REPLACEMENT AND TEST USING THE ALTERNATE TEST PROCEDURES?
Should the maintenance engineer be held responsible?
Were the pilots aware of it's "criticality"?
"WHERE THESE GUYS EVEN AWARE OF MCAS, HAD THEY BEEN TRAINED, WAS NOT IN THEIR AVAILABLE COCKPIT MANUALS OR HAD THEY BEEN TOLD "IT'S JUST ANOTHER 737 - OFF YOU GO"?
Should the pilots be held responsible?
I would suggest none of the above were aware of the possible "criticality" and consequences.
Due to, a Boeing management's corporate decision, to sell aircraft to, who lied too airline executives, they new were uncertifiable, lied too global certifying agencies, except by lying to them all.
In addition by not making any of the above professionals aware of MCAS's existence, provide type specific training and type specific simulations by Boeing when connected to MCAS in the plane's complete "certified" flight envelope and it's, now proven, deadly affect.
One comment from another site, listing many failures prior to MCAS being added:
"AOA’s aren’t that reliable, and didn’t need to be before MCAS depended on them to fly the aircraft .. look at any accident database for AOA errors
for example..
https://avrodex.com/?q=aoa
https://leehamnews.com/2019/10/25/bj...es/#more-31457
The reason that this is inexcusable is because for many years of AOA systems have constantly failed and because, the affected planes did not have Boeing MCAS, pilots, suppliers and maintenance workers became accustomed to these types of "flying aids/instrument failures" and historically were able to fly the planes manually.
Don't try your racist game when Boeing intentionally/by design sold unsafe planes to make others lose sales of certified airworthy alternatives.
The AOA was an aid, the pilots were trained to accept "problems" with the AOA and could control the airplane manually.
Unfortunately the Boeing MCAS system produced such a large number of alarms, flashing buttons, horns going off, buzzers etc. for which no airline pilot flying Boeing 737 MAX pilots had been trained to react too, 100's of lives were lost.
From the actual report as published by Flight Global:
"Indonesian investigation authority KNKT says a 21° misalignment in the left-hand sensor activated the stick-shaker, generated airspeed and altitude disagree warnings, and triggered the controversial Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System before the aircraft came down on 29 October last year.
The sensor had been replaced in Denpasar the day before, 28 October, after the aircraft had experienced repetitive air data problems on previous flights, including speed and altitude flags on the captain's primary instrument display.
No spare sensor had been available in Denpasar, so the engineer ordered one from Batam Aero Technic, located in Batam, and the aircraft was grounded in the meantime.
Once the replacement sensor was fitted, the maintenance manual required an installation test using one of two methods.
The recommended method involves using a specific piece of test equipment which was unavailable in Denpasar, says the inquiry.
It states that the engineer resorted to the alternative test method which involves deflecting the angle-of-attack vane to various positions – fully up, centre, and fully down – while verifying indications on the built-in test equipment module of the stall management yaw damper computer.
But the inquiry says the engineer "did not record" the angle-of-attack values shown on the computer during the installation test – despite this being required by Batam Aero Technic procedures.
The engineer in Denpasar claimed the test result was "satisfactory", says the inquiry, and released the aircraft for flight, believing the problems had been resolved.
But KNKT says investigators could not conclude whether the installation test had been successful, pointing out that the sensor was subsequently found to have a 21° bias.
Boeing and the US National Transportation Safety Board carried out a sensor installation test, using the same alternative method employed in Denpasar, with a sensor which had been deliberately misaligned by 33° before fitting.
"The test result indicated that a misaligned [sensor] would not pass the installation test as the [angle-of-attack] values shown on the [stall management yaw damper] computer were out of tolerance," says the inquiry.
This out-of-tolerance situation resulted in a 'sensor invalid' message on the test equipment module, it adds, verifying that this alternative testing method "should have" identified a 21° misalignment on the Lion Air jet's sensor.
Although the engineer in Denpasar provided photos of the stall management yaw damper unit during an installation test, as evidence of a satisfactory result, the inquiry states that the photos were "not valid evidence" because they were not related to the aircraft involved in the accident
The result of the sensor installation test "could not be determined with any certainty", it adds.
Analysis of flight-data recorder information shows that, after the jet was released for flight from Denpasar to Jakarta, the values recorded by the replaced left-hand angle-of-attack sensor were 21° higher than those of the right-hand sensor.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/lion-737-max-inquiry-uncertain-over-swapped-sensor-t-461809/
The final report can be found here:
http://knkt.dephub.go.id/knkt/ntsc_a...l%20Report.pdf
Last edited by OhOh; 26-10-2019 at 11:05 PM.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)