Thread: Russian envoy to Lebanon: Any U.S. missiles fired at Syria will be shot down

Originally Posted by Neo

Hahaha... yeah cos the US has an impeccable record of winning conventional wars

and that's a fact even by Harry standard

You'd think by now harry would understand the point is not to win

My the Putin girls choir must be apoplectic this morning.

He looks like a right pussy.

How many major battles has the US lost since WW2? Lost the war politically/strategically maybe but dominate in every tactical facet.

Originally Posted by bsnub

How many major battles has the US lost since WW2? Lost the war politically/strategically maybe but dominate in every tactical facet.

Don't get all excited snubby, there is a big difference between battles involving troops and pushing a button on a drone control stick.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

My the Putin girls choir must be apoplectic this morning.

He looks like a right pussy.

Despises Western warmongering and media manipulation = must love Putin

harry/snub logic 101

Originally Posted by Neo

Despises Western warmongering and media manipulation = must love Putin

harry/snub logic 101

And I see one of the sopranos responded.

Sure harry... your dumb and he's dumber.. well done

Originally Posted by Neo

Sure harry... your dumb and he's dumber.. well done

Ohh the irony coming from a man who's mouth is never far from Putin's cock.

Originally Posted by Neo

Hasn't the US and UK broke international law yet again.?

The U.N. security council is urging all members to abide by it's rules and not further escalate the conflict.. I mean we all know the U.N. is the US's lapdog and this is a close as it dare get to actually saying the US just broke the law.

Nothing is proven, sources of evidence are contentious, the OPCW hasn't carried out it's investigation.

Even harry/snub must be concerned they're getting railroaded by the media.. uh.. on second thought

Hey if Vlad wants to pick up the UN's tab, he can get more of a say in it.

You're lucky they still have an office with that retard Bolton in the White House.

Originally Posted by Norton

Such as?

Never mind some heavy consequence such as lost of lives, destroyed country, escalation of war, etc..

(Important that we no longer will see the kids with "red eyes" horified by the men with water hose...)

Originally Posted by Norton

Originally Posted by Klondyke

He added that Trump's decision to conduct strike in Syria is deeply mistaken and can lead to very heavy consequences.

Such as?

it will be interesting to see if any critical infrastructure (electrical grid, nuclear power plants, air traffic control, etc...) in the US gets hacked in the next week or so.

Originally Posted by Norton

Such as?

Something in the future. Such as illustrating the crusader coalition has no morals, ignores the UN Charter, attacks a sovereign country without any cause, ......

Originally Posted by bsnub

Good luck with that.

Why follow a failed empires play-book.

Originally Posted by Norton

Suicide for Russia. Wrong answer.

Agree.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Name of thread:

Russian envoy to Lebanon: Any U.S. missiles fired at Syria will be shot down

You may wish to refer to the Russian Foreign Ministries site prior to accepting bsnubs or Reuters edited fake story on the link.

at least some good news according to the BBC,

Was anyone killed?

According to a Russian defence ministry statement, "preliminary information" said there had been no casualties among the Syrian army or civilians.
There were initial reports that three civilians had been injured in Homs.
US Secretary of Defence James Mattis told journalists there were no reports of US losses in the operation.

Gen Dunford said the US had communicated with Russia ahead of the strikes through the normal procedures of their "deconfliction" hotline, which is used to prevent accidental clashes in a war zone with multiple international players. There had been concerns that if the US strike had hit Russian military personnel on the ground, it would further escalate tension.

We should of course, after yesterday's illusion, await the damage reports before suggesting any damage to many players.

The fact that ameristan acted outside its own laws, the fact that ameristan, UK and France acted outside of any international laws or conventions, the fact that ameristan, UK and France destroyed anybody's illusion that they believe in the UN Charter is enough.

Lets recap as to what, allegedly, has been achieved so far:

The One Day War: US, UK, France Launch Criminal Attack on Syria and Syria Wins

"As was widely suspected, the US, UK and France launched an illegal war of aggression against Syria in the early hours of 14 April. The aggressors targeted two Syrian airbases and a civilian educational structure in Barzeh, while some reports form the ground say other targets including in Hama were engage by the aggressors.

However, in spite of the criminal acts from the US, UK and France, of the 103 cruise missiles launched by the aggressors, 71 were successfully intercepted by Syria’s missile defence systems. This fact was verified by the Russian Defense Ministry, whose forces did not participate in the conflict.


What’s more is that while Donald Trump bragged of his “new and smart” missiles, these missiles were in their majority, successfully intercepted by the forces of the Syrian Arab Army who were relying on often 30 year old Soviet hardwareincluding the S-100 and S-200 systems as well as some Buk and Kvadrat units.


Because of the successful intercepting of the missiles, the overall material damage done by the attack is thought to be minimal. As a result of the attack, Russia has suggested offering further upgrades to Syria’s defensive weapons. According to the Russian General Staff,


While the war was short and according to the US itself was a one time attack, an act of military aggression against a sovereign state that posed no threat to the attacking state, is necessarily defined as a war. In this ‘One Day War’ Syria clearly won as the majority of the missiles fired by the US, UK and France were shot down while those that landed did little damage.


For the US, this reality will be particularly embarrassing as modern western weapons, almost all of which were US made or designed have been in their majority shot down by a war torn, terrorist torn Arab Republic using Soviet weapons, some of which were originally produced before French President Emmanuel Macron was born. Clearly the US and its even more enthusiastic imperial partners of old Europe will have been severely embarrassed by this.


So while Syria is the clear winner and the US, UK and France the clear losers, what about the other parties to the conflict ?



–Turkey - No use of Turkish airbase!



Of the non-combatants to Syria’s ‘One Day War’, Turkey came out in the best shape. Hours before the attack, President Erdogan insisted that he maintained contacts with Washington and Moscow in hopes of attempting to de-escalate the situation. Meanwhile, it has been confirmed that Turkey which made its opposition to missile strikes from the US, Europe or Russia widely known, apparently did not allow the aggressors to use its NATO air base at Incirlik although the Deputy Prime Minister of Turkey, said the issue was discussed.

This is an obvious euphemism for Turkey putting its foot down and holding on to its neutrality throughout the escalation of tensions. While in the aftermath Turkey said that the strikes were “appropriate”, one cannot underplay Turkey’s role in helping to retard the volatility in the conflict which led to the illegal strikes and nor can one ignore the fact that Turkey has every intention to stabilise the situation in line not with western wishers but with Turkey’s unique position in the Astana group for peace which also includes Iran and Russia.


–Russia - No assets attacked, no response!

While Russia can be accused of humiliating itself by failing to act in such a way that would have deterred western aggression against a partner and while Russia can be equally accused of sitting back rather than aiding Syria’s defences against the missile strike, Russia cannot be accused of being dishonest. In fact, Russia did exactly what it said it would do which is precisely nothing, unless Russian human or material assets were targets in the strike. Because no Russians came under threat, Russia sat by and did nothing, just as they promised to do.


–Iran - No assets attacked, no response to yesterdays attack


Iran has promised retaliation, both against an earlier “Israeli” strike and in a broader sense against the US, UK and France strikes, but has not given a time or place for when this will occur. Because Iran has multiple military assets in Syria and the wider region, Iran may soon become the worst nightmare for any power seeking to aggressively attack or occupy an Iranian partner.


–“Israel” - No attack on Syria, Russian, Iranian or Hezbollah assets - Neutered!

While the “Israeli” regime has been attempting to destroy the Syrian Arab Republic for decades, in this case, Tel Aviv dodged a bullet as it was not in “Israel’s” interest to unleash a conflict that had the potential to spiral out of control. If a wider conflict did emerge, many anti-“Israel” forces, including the Lebanese Resistance Movement Hezbollah may have abandoned their restrained posture and launched a full scale attack on the regime. Thus, the limited nature of the strike has shielded “Israel” from a conflict that it is ill-prepared to fight, while Syria’s successful defence against the aggression has sent a powerful message to “Israel”, a nation known for conducting its own illegal strikes against Syria and others."

The One Day War: US, UK, France Launch Criminal Attack on Syria and Syria Wins - Eurasia Future

Because of the pre knowledge "it is highly likely" the Syrian buildings/airfields attacked were empty,
The "best of the best" weapons available to the crusader coalition utilised, were mostly destroyed by 30 year old Russian designed, manufactured and supplied SAMS.

The attackers have debased themselves as warmongering, illegal instigators of another war based on publicly announced "secret" or sexed-up fake allegations.

The UN has publicly denounced the illegal actions of the attackers.

It seems, to me, the democratically elected Presidents of Syria and Russia, the Iranian Government and the Hezbollah party of Lebanon have come out on top, once again.

But as I started with, new "facts" may be released from the top-secret 'arry files in 30 years. Some countries have previous on this as we know.

Originally Posted by OhOh

There are plenty of sites with The LORD's photos or videos available to view whilst rubbing one out.

You would know.

Originally Posted by OhOh

It seems, to me, the democratically elected Presidents of Syria and Russia, the Iranian Government and the Hezbollah party of Lebanon have come out on top, once again.

"Come out on top"?

Humiliated is the word you seek.

"We will destroy the rockets and the targets that launched them" etc.

Translation: "We will do fuck all and look like a right shower of twats".

But it didn't actually achieve anything. Tomorrow, same as it ever was.

Originally Posted by Neverna

But it didn't actually achieve anything. Tomorrow, same as it ever was.

Yep.....

Originally Posted by Neverna

But it didn't actually achieve anything. Tomorrow, same as it ever was.

You anticipate another chemical attack?

I don't.

The rest will carry on as usual though, perhaps with a few extra barrel bombs.

Originally Posted by OhOh

You may wish to refer to the Russian Foreign Ministries site prior to accepting bsnubs or Reuters edited fake story on the link.

Originally Posted by OhOh

attacks a sovereign country without any cause

...leave Ukraine out of this...