Former Russian spy critically ill in Britain after exposure to unidentified substance

The equipment in the play area is clearly unused.

It was taken from a secret MI5 warehouse 25 miles away and installed in a hurry by fake police officers.

Google maps colluded in the deception.

In fact, nobody was poisoned, the former spy & daughter have been kidnapped and are being held in an illegal interrogation center commissioned by the Illuminati. It's located underneath the fake playground.

If you look closely, you can spot the handle and hinges on the roundabout. Near the swing, one can still detect traces of bodies dragged across the sand.

What is the significance of the number 25, you may ask. Look up the writings of the 7th book, it's all there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyrille

I'm calling doctored pic.

---

I googled it, the pic Nev published is the actual park.

^
Ah, another one easily misled by the Illuminati owned MSM and MI6 controlled Google...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by stroller

Ah, another one easily misled by the Illuminati owned MSM and MI6 controlled Google...

---

I'll appologise if I'm wrong but I ain't. https://www.spirefm.co.uk/news/local...investigation/

Looks like the Russian oligarchs have some control over the USA in keeping this murder on American soil quiet. If you add up all the Russians that died quickly over the past three years, it is quite the list. As I have said before, I hope someone has Mueller's back as he brings light to all of this.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/jasonleopol...ral#.ab9A1dbkQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

as it was before Skripal lived there. Bought for 260,000 in 2011.

---

Surely after years of saving pence to pence (kopeika to kopeika?)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomcat

I expect an RT report imminently...

---

I have to laugh how somebody cocks his nose over some sources. "It's a state run source, such is nothing for me, I believe only the ones not run by a state, the case closed."

Really? You do believe such "recognized" one that's run by corporations? And how a corporation is controlled? To whom do a corporation respond? Surely not to the public.

Unlike a source "run by a state" where always are the means for public control.

Pity of such people who do not use their brain and feel so übermensch over some sources...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Surely after years of saving pence to pence (kopeika to kopeika?)

---

A tidy sum for a Russian, be it on released from prison or a public servant. One wonders how many UK prisoners, upon release, purchase such properties.

Russian investigators seek UK legal support in case of Skripal’s daughter

"MOSCOW, March 29 (RAPSI) – The Investigative Committee of Russia has forwarded a request to the UK authorities seeking legal support in a criminal case over attempted murder of Yulia Skripal, the daughter of the former Russian intelligence officer Sergey Skripal, the Committee’s press-service has stated.

The Investigative Committee has provided the request to the Prosecutor General’s Office for official transfer to British authorities.


Investigators ask their counterparts in the United Kingdom to establish the circumstances of the crime and provide copies of the case documents including reports on examination of the place where Skripal was found as well as the results of her medical examination. The Committee noted that it is ready to cooperate with the Great Britain in this case.


On March 4, ex-Russian intelligence officer Sergey Skripal, who was found guilty of espionage in favor of the UK in 2006 and pardoned later, and his daughter Yulia were affected by a powerful nerve agent. Currently, both of them are in critical condition in a British hospital. Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Theresa May accused Russia of unlawful use of force in Great Britain. Russia denies the accusations.

Later, Russian authorities launched a criminal case over attempted murder of Yulia Skripal in Salisbury."

Russian investigators seek UK legal support in case of Skripal?s daughter | Russian Legal Information Agency (RAPSI).
Investigative Committee of Russia

"The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (Russian: Следственный комитет Российской Федерации) has since January 2011 been the main federal investigating authority in Russia. Its name (Sledstvennyi komitet) is usually abbreviated to Sledkom (Russian: Следком). The agency replaced the Russian Prosecutor General's Investigative Committee and operates as Russia's anti-corruption agency. It is answerable to the President of Russia and has statutory responsibility for inspecting the police forces, combating police corruption and police misconduct and is responsible for conducting investigations into local authorities and federal governmental bodies."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invest...ttee_of_Russia

29 March 201821:20
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s reply to a media question about Russia’s retaliation against the expulsion of Russian diplomats, Moscow, March 29, 2018

599-29-03-2018


https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...id=11069&stc=1

"Question: Will you retaliate against the expulsion of Russian diplomats using tit-for-tat methods or something stronger?

Sergey Lavrov: We will retaliate in kind, but there will be more. Virtually right now, US Ambassador to Russia Jon Huntsman is at the Ministry and Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov is explaining to him the substance of our retaliatory measures with regard to the United States. These include the expulsion of the same number of US diplomats and our decision to withdraw our consent to the operation of the US Consulate General in St Petersburg. As for the number of diplomatic mission staff from the other countries who will be leaving Russia, it is also a tit-for-tat procedure. Basically, this is it.


I would like to say right away that in addition, we want to do more than just respond to the absolutely unacceptable actions taken against us under the harshest ever US and British pressure predicated on the “Skripal case.” By the way, I would like to mention with some satisfaction that earlier today the British authorities informed us about the condition of at least Yulia Skripal. They said Yulia is rapidly recovering. We again urged them to provide us with access to Yulia as a Russian citizen. I hope our British counterparts will be able to perform its obligations under the Consular Convention and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.


We will not just respond reactively to what the Anglo-Saxon tandem is doing with regard to Russia, forcing everyone to follow the anti-Russian course. We would like to establish the truth. Since the very start of this crisis, we have repeatedly stated that British Prime Minister Theresa May has baselessly accused Russia of being implicated in the poisoning of Sergey Skripal and his daughter. She urged us in an ultimatum-like manner to answer a question that could not be answered: she demanded that, within 24 hours, we confirm that the Russian leadership had ordered the poisoning of the Skripals or that they had lost control over their chemical arsenal. Clearly, it is impossible to respond to these things, even if we tried hard to find some answers. Instead, we suggested that they refer to international law, the Chemical Weapons Convention which contains a special article. Under this article, if any party to the CWC has questions for another party, it is recommended that they get in contact with each other, hold a bilateral exchange of views and information, and hold consultations. Great Britain arrogantly turned this down and instead dug out of the CWC a technical clause to the effect that a party to the Convention can apply to the OPCW Technical Secretariat for technical assistance. Under that clause, OPCW experts have now arrived in Britain at its invitation to form an opinion and analyse the substance, which, as the British allege, was used to poison Sergey and Yulia Skripal. I would like to note right away that this article only enables the OPCW Technical Secretariat to identify the chemical composition of a substance that will be presented for analysis. The OPCW Technical Secretariat has no power to confirm or verify Britain’s conclusions. It has no such rights. Also, the investigation itself is not over yet. As you know, Scotland Yard says that it will take months, but the verdict has been returned nonetheless. This is sad, because we have not seen so much mockery of international law for quite a long time.


To get a normal discussion and to establish the truth, we have officially proposed to convene an extraordinary session of the OPCW Executive Council on April 4, where we will present a summary of the specific questions that we have repeatedly asked. I hope that our Western partners will not evade an honest conversation. Otherwise they will confirm once again that what is happening is a premeditated gross provocation.


Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov?s reply to a media question about Russia?s retaliation against the expulsion of Russian diplomats, Moscow, March 29, 2018 - News - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

Russia reads the riot act to US

“The video of Pakistan Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi nonchalantly zipping up his trousers at the JFK airport in New York after the frisking when he landed on American soil recently, gives a dismal feeling. But one would say, ‘No surprises here!’ No, I’m not making a ‘anti-Pakistan’ statement. Frankly, 90 percent of the Indian elite would also any day be only too eager to unzip their trousers if that was what was needed to be permitted to enter the US. Remember the famous incident of the stripping of an Indian Defence Minister right down to his underwear at the JFK airport? It is in their DNA – be it Abbasis or Bhatias and Suris. Pathetic. Their argument is a familiar one – only the West can provide us investments and new technology, management practices and facilitate integration into global technological chains. Of course, Indian pundits went overboard by expounding that the George W Bush administration was determined to make their country a ‘great power’ and a ‘counterweight’ to China, and make it America’s ‘natural ally’ and so on.

That is why this morning’s news of the expulsion of 60 American diplomats posted in Russia brings cheer. To be frank, I was skeptical whether Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov would be able to keep his word when he said earlier this week that Russia would retaliate. The point is, Russia also has its fair share of the ‘westernists’ among its elite. Even after all that has happened in Russia’s relations with the US in the recent years and notwithstanding the foul air that envelops them, there are Russian strategists who still argue that America is an indispensable partner for Russia.

Therefore, Moscow’s decision to give back to the Americans fully in their own coin marks a new stage. First, Russians have assessed that the controversy over the Skripal spy case is in reality an Anglo-American joint venture – and not a solo act by London. Evidently, the feedback from various European capitals would be that they came under immense American pressure to follow the US-UK lead and expel Russian diplomats. Which means there is a deliberate American strategy to degrade Russia’s relations with the West. There is really no sense in Moscow trying to salvage the situation by making conciliatory moves.

Second, Russians are no longer making a distinction between President Trump and the so-called Deep State in America. They will henceforth attack Trump’s policies on merit. Put differently, Trump cannot have it both ways – being pally with Vladimir Putin on the phone while also acting bloody-mindedly toward Russia on the policy front. The Russians couldn’t care a damn anymore as to who is the “real Trump” or whether he is only trying to placate the “swamp” in the Beltway.

Third, most important, Russia is assessing that the only language Washington understands is the language of strength. This of course has profound consequences for regional and international security. Indeed, there are serious limitations today to the US’ capacity to browbeat Russia. The US policies are inconsistent and fickle whereas Russian foreign policy is rational, coherent and stable. The American society is hopelessly split and polarized whereas Russian society is consolidated and stands united. Trump can never match anywhere near the groundswell of support Putin enjoys from the Russian nation.

In geopolitical terms, the US’ transatlantic leadership role is shaky. Interestingly, while making token expulsion of Russian diplomats on Monday, Germany also simultaneously gave the final clearance for the construction of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project from Russia, defying the US opposition. French President Emmanuel Macron just signaled his plan to visit Russia in May. Austria point blank turned down the US-UK demarche seeking expulsion of Russian diplomats. May 12 becomes a crucial dateline: if Trump tears up the Iran nuclear deal, there may be mutiny by the US’ European allies.

On the other hand, China has signaled its interest to further strengthen the quasi-alliance with Russia. The Chinese Ministry of Defence said on Thursday that Beijing and Moscow will “jointly defend the interests of the two states and also maintain regional and global peace and stability.” No doubt, it is a hugely resonant statement in the prevailing backdrop. The Chinese Defence Minister Wei Fenghe is visiting Moscow next week.

In strategic terms, too, the new weapon systems developed by Russia (announced by Putin on March 1) reinforce the country’s capacity to maintain global strategic balance for the foreseeable future. The hypersonic missiles, in particular, are unique and can be decisively lethal in a Russia-US confrontation. Significantly, the Russian note verbale on Thursday declaring the expulsion of 60 American diplomats gives a pointed warning to the Trump administration that any seizure of Russian assets in the US “will lead to a serious deterioration in bilateral relations, which will result in dire consequences for global stability.” Read the defiant remarks by Lavrov regarding the expulsion of American diplomats.”

http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakuma...iot-act-to-us/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

The detective sergeant, allegedly poisoned with a deadly chemical weapon but quickly released after a miracle cure, unavailable for unknown reasons to the two other, alleged, CW poisoned victims, actually isn't a Salisbury based police office.

He, allegedly, is employed by another town police force some 25 MILES AWAY. :)

---

Who alleges he is employed by another town police force some 25 MILES AWAY. Please point us to a source of this allegation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

A very important part of this puzzle" has vanished from the scene with no public investigation. In my mind suspiciously.

---

What is this "very important part of this puzzle" that has "vanished"? Please be specific so that those of us who haven't read the same conspiracy and whackjob websites as you can understand. :) Thanks in advance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

infected with OhOh27 BS agent.

---

:smileylaughing:

A good read of events.

Quote:

---

NHS Doctor: "No Patients Have Experienced Symptoms Of Nerve Agent Poisoning In Salisbury"

---

Quote:

---

The Skripal poisoning case stinks. The British government is obviously not telling the truth about it. It uses the script of a recent spy drama to allege a 'Novichok' attack to implicate Russia and to raise anti-Russian sentiment. Information about the case is evidently held back. The media is mostly complicit.

---

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/no-patients-have-experienced-symptoms-of-nerve-agent-poisoning-in-salisbury.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

www.moonofalabama.org

---

...:rofl:...

You may laugh Tom.

Quote:

---

March 12, 2018
Theresa May's "45 Minutes" Moment

Today the British government made some dubious assertions about Saddam's chemical weapons the poisoning of its double agentSergej Skripal.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2018/03/24.jpgbigger

The British Prime Minister Theresa May claimed (saved tweet) in Parliament that:

• Sergej Skripal and his daughter were poisoned with a military grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia.
• The nerve agent was part of a group of agents known as 'Novichok'.
• Russia has previously produced the agent and would still be capable of doing so.
• Russia has a record of conducting state sponsored assassinations.
• The British government assesses that Russia views some defectors as legitimate targets.
• The British government concluded that it is highly likely that Russia was responsible for the act against Sergej and Yulia Skripal.

May went on to claim that:

• This was either a direct act by the Russian State against the United Kingdom or
• the Russian government lost control of the nerve agent and let it fall into the hands of others.

I find all of the above claims not only dubious but laughable. Here are some facts:
Novichok, 'newcomers' in English, are a zoo of chemical warfare agents that were developed in the Soviet Union in the 1970s and 80s. Some of the 'newcomers' are said to be highly toxic.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2018/03/25.jpgbigger

The existence of these chemical agents was disclosed in 1992. Russia joined the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction in 1997. It has since (unlike the U.S.) destroyed all left over stocks from the Soviet Union's chemical weapon program. It does not produce chemical weapons.
These agents and their formulas are not an exclusively Russian knowledge or product:

One of the key manufacturing sites was the Soviet State Scientific Research Institute for Organic Chemistry and Technology (GosNIIOKhT) in Nukus, Uzbekistan. Small, experimental batches of the weapons may have been tested on the nearby Ustyurt plateau. It may also have been tested in a research centre in Krasnoarmeysk near Moscow. Since its independence in 1991, Uzbekistan has been working with the government of the United States to dismantle and decontaminate the sites where the Novichok agents and other chemical weapons were tested and developed.

The formulas for the various Novichok agents are not a Russian secret. The U.S. and the UK surely know how to make these. The agents are said to be made from simply components used in civil industrial processes. (To qualify any agent as "military grade" is by the way nonsense. Many chemical agents used in civil process are also incredibly deadly.) The Porton Down chemical weapon laboratory of the British military is only some 8 miles away from Salisbury where the Skripals were allegedly poisoned. The British government claims that Porton Down identified the agent allegedly used on the Skripals. The laboratory is surely also capable of producing such stuff, just like similar laboratories in other countries are able to do.
Now lets counter May's claims:

• Novichok agents are claimed to be up to 10 times as toxic as VX. One drop of VX can kill a person. If the Skripals were poisoned with such an highly effective agent how come they are still alive?
• The Soviet Union, not Russia, developed such agents. The main work was done in Uzbekistan. The U.S. helped to dismantled the laboratory.
• Russia is likely able to re-produce such agents but so are many, many other countries.
• What is Russia's "record of state sponsored assassinations"? The British investigation which claimed that "Russia" was somehow involved in the death of MI6 agent Litvinenko is highly dubious. I am not aware of any other cases. There is a long standing protocol to never bother spies that have been exchanged in a spy-swap.
• If Russia sees "some defectors" as legitimate targets why does it not immediately kill them? Skripal was living openly in the UK since 2010. Why would Russia kill him at all and why now?

Given the above it is absurd to conclude that it is "highly likely" that Russia was responsible. If someone is run-over by a BMW is it"highly likely" that the German government is responsible for it?
The real likeliness for that is just as high as the likeliness that Saddam could hit the UK with a chemical weapon missile within 45 minutes. That was a fraudulent claim another British government once made.
May's claims today are just as believable as the all nonsense Tony Blair said about Saddam or as the show U.S. Secretary of State Powell delivered in front of the UN Security Council.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2018/03/26.jpgvia @Propagandaschau - bigger

More likely is an involvement of Skripal in the Steele dossier and the CIA/MI6 operation against Donald Trump. Was he assailed because he threatened to talk about it?

---

...still chuckling over your "source", thanks...:rofl:...you rt/swampblog dementos are always good for a laugh...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomcat

...still chuckling over your "source", thanks......you rt/swampblog dementos are always good for a laugh...

---

And vice versa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

Please point us to a source of this allegation.

---

Allegation or opinion? You prove it is not a fact. Your UK police friends may help.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

What is this "very important part of this puzzle

---

An alleged witness was utilised to "inform" the public of a crime. Since he was "cured" nobody has asked zilch.

Have they been warned off, officially or quietly, or has he served his purpose and now the spotlight is switched off?

On with the next fairy tale, but the shit clings to the integrity of the chosen victim. This method has been used time after time. If you can look back in recent and ancient history, just for a second or too. I'm sure your web search engine of choice will help.

You could ask your UK police "friends"to confirm this "opinion":

"A DS does NOT get called to drunks on a bench (the initial call to Wiltshire Constabulary), nor does a regular CID DS go to search the house of drunks found on a bench. Both of these are uniform roles.

Nor would general duty police, uniform or CID, know who a resettled SIS agent was, let alone where he’d been settled. There may have/should have been a restricted marker flagged on the national computer, but access to the knowledge contained therein would be extremely limited."

And this:

"do you not realise that DS Bailey’s wife works for Cambrdige Analytica?"

Allegedlyinfo about DS Bailey which ran on Sky News on 8 March. Not being a Sky listener I can't confirm it.:


"The police officer who fell seriously ill after the nerve agent attack put a rapist behind bars who had been at large for decades.Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey, 38, is now stable and conscious after being in intensive care following the attack. Ex-Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia are still critically ill after they were found collapsed on a bench in Salisbury.

DS Bailey was one of the first at the scene when the pair were found slumped in The Maltings on Sunday. The officer was recognised for outstanding police work in December 2016 when he put a Salisbury rapist behind bars for more than 14 years. He spent two years building a case against Arthur Bonner, who sexually assaulted numerous victims over four decades between the early 1970s and 2014. His work was praised by the then chief constable Mike Veale for his dedication and outstanding professionalism and for the sensitive way he dealt with the victims and their families.

Acting Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police, Kier Pritchard, said he had been to visit DS Bailey. He said: “I’ve known Nick for many years, he’s a great character. He’s a huge presence in Wiltshire Police – well-liked, well-loved, a massively dedicated officer. “He’s clearly receiving high specialist treatment. He’s well, he’s sat up. He’s clearly not the Nick that I know, but he’s in the safe hands of the medical professionals working in Salisbury District Hospital.

“But he’s very anxious, very concerned. He did his best on that night. I’m proud of all our staff who attended this incident at the Maltings on that night. They responded to try to protect people who were ill, with limited information.”

Messages of support have poured in for DS Bailey from the public and police forces across the country. Sarah Bailey, from Waters Road, Salisbury, said DS Bailey was involved in a case with her a few years ago. She told the Salisbury Journal: “He was fantastic, so helpful and supportive. I really do hope he has a full and speedy recovery."


It may be useful to search telephone records of the three alleged victims.

Some MSM and the local Russian Ambassador which may assist you:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/28/russian-hit-squad-put-nerve-agent-sergei-skripals-front-door/

https://news.sky.com/story/russias-novichok-programme-exists-i-worked-on-it-scientist-tells-sky-news-11300710

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/poisoned-policeman-leaves-hospital-hg0ftjgk2

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5760557/nick-bailey-detective-sergeant-russian-spy-sergei-skripal-daughter-yulia-poison-plot-leave-hospital-recovering/

https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/s...93790762405888

Apparently the daughter is recovering somewhat. Will be interesting to hear what she has to say, if coherent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Allegation or opinion? You prove it is not a fact.

---

FFS, you posted..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

The detective sergeant, .....
He, allegedly, is employed by another town police force some 25 MILES AWAY. :)

---

It is therefore an allegation according to your post. So where did you get that allegation from? Who alleges it? What is the source for that allegation/claim? Tell us or provide a link to it. Or admit that you made it up if that's what you did.

You have raised[allegedly] an interesting[allegedly] point.

I will be much more discrete when posting here. Thank you for your own, the sites owners or possibly legal advice.

I suggest all posts are run past 3 Internationally renowned and eminent Singapore/Thai lawyers by the mods and obtain the lawyer's opinion and case citations. Just to ensure they cannot be accused of posting lies and hence prosecuted for defamation of character, emotional distress ........

Put it to the owners and post their decision here for us all to see and change the character of the site.

Back to the topic of this thread.

It appears, [no confirmation available currently from an international judge], that a UK regime run MSM, [allegedly], has published, [allegedly] a news story[allegedly] on their [allegedly] site on 27th March 2018 [allegedly] the following text and video [allegedly]:

"
Spy poisoning: Skripal niece says she would like to know how they are

Viktoria Skripal, the niece of the poisoned Russian spy, Sergei Skripal, told the BBC she hopes a miracle will happen. Three weeks after the nerve agent attack in Salisbury, Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia remain in a critical condition. Viktoria Skripal is one of their closest living relatives and she spoke exclusively to BBC Russian's Olga Ivshina in Russia about how the family are coping.

Spy poisoning: Skripal niece says she would like to know how they are - BBC News


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At 27 seconds into the interview the interviewer asks, "If you were offered the chance to go to the UK, would you?

https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...id=11077&stc=1

At 30 seconds into the interview the niece of the attacked Russian citizen replies, "Of course I would, I would never say no"

https://teakdoor.com/attachment.php?a...id=11078&stc=1

At the UK court hearing the judge stated [allegedly] that there had been no enquiries by "family" for permission to visit the Russian citizen or "any other interested person". [allegedly]

One wonders [personally and in no legal way] who in the UK is required, legally, to accept such requests and have they made these facts known to anybody.

One wonders [personally and in no legal way] if the BBC can locate this [alleged} niece of the [alleged] victim of a CW attack [allegedly], the authorities called upon to act for the [alleged] victim of a CW attack, had no luck themselves in locating this, [alleged} niece of the [alleged] victim.

All these statements and images, below GOLD dashed line, the are based on the BBC web site, as referenced above and cannot be relied on, factually, as at some point may be deleted from the UK Government managed and directed web site.

Signed this day, 31/1/2018 at 13:58 Thai Time.

หเำะไหฟๆ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

You have raised an interesting point.

I will be much more discrete when posting here. Thank you for your own, the sites owners or possibly legal advice.

I suggest all posts are run past 3 Internationally renowned and eminent Thai lawyers by the mods and obtain the lawyer's opinion and case citations. Just to ensure they cannot be accused of posting lies and hence prosecuted for defamation of character, emotional distress ........

Put it to the owners and post their decision here for us all to see and change the character of the site.

---

^ More waffle and more deflection.

What is the source for the 25 mile allegation/claim? Who alleges it?

^ OhDoh exposed as a fraud again. :) Not the first time he has been caught posting bullshit.

I am happy that he challenges the official narrative and it's up to him if he posts bullshit sourced from others (if he posts where he actually sourced the bullshit). But when he refuses to post the source of allegations or claims that he posts, it makes it appear that the allegation/claim/bullshit comes from OhOh himself, which has the stench of lies, fake news and trolling about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

I am happy that he challenges the official narrative and it's up to him if he posts bullshit sourced from others (if he posts where he actually sourced the bullshit).

---

Challenging the narrative is always a good thing but using as you mentioned bullshit (usually state sponsored propaganda) sources does nothing to convince most of us. It just comes down to more time wasted on his part as people tend to skip his posts/threads because of said bullshit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

it makes it appear that the allegation/claim/bullshit comes from OhOh himself

---

Then there is that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

It is therefore an allegation according to your post.

---

Are you sure? Have you obtained a legal ruling on that post?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsnub

^ OhDoh exposed as a fraud again

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bsnub

but using as you mentioned bullshit

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

fake news and trolling about it.

---

I suggest you both read the updated post No.602 and consider what you both are alleging against me, personally, the web site owners and possibly for anybody who desires to do so, many other instances of possibly illegal assertions.

If we are all here subjected to such behaviour, by others who have differing opinions, it may change the character of the site. In my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

I suggest you both read the updated post No.602

---

Life really is far too short, and you are clearly neither enlightening nor amusing.

Since you can't do 'thought provoking' either that's pretty much a busted flush.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote Originally Posted by Neverna View Post
It is therefore an allegation according to your post.

Are you sure?

---

Absolutely:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

He, allegedly, is employed by another town police force some 25 MILES AWAY. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cyrille

Life really is far too short

---

Indeed it is.

Any mentioning of the alleged Skripal's intention to return back to his motherland?

Similar as was the silly intention of the poor guy Boris Berezovsky who even allegedly provided a humble letter to his friend Putin. However, once the letter signed a rope was tied up to his golden chandelier...

Well, it is not necessary to state that the letter was "allegedly" provided to Putin, since it's a fact that it was handed over, if it was signed by Putin.

But, if something is "alleged", one might be curious who it is alleged by, to investigate further.

DS Bailey did a spell at HQ in Devises, 25 miles away. He then went back to work in Salisbury CID. The guy has worked in the police force for over 15 years, mostly in Salisbury, a city he is very familiar with.

You can put your tin foil hats back on now...

^ Well done, Troy. If only OhOh could be as helpful.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...ripal-improves

Bailey joined the force in 2002 and he knew Salisbury city centre well, having worked there as a member of the neighbourhood policing team.

He became a detective constable and single-handedly worked on the case of Arthur Bonner, who sexually assaulted multiple victims over four decades between the early 1970s and 2014.

After Bonner was jailed for 14 years, Bailey was awarded a chief constable’s certificate of excellence.

Bailey was transferred to Wiltshire’s force headquarters in Devizes before being moved back to Salisbury CID, where he worked on thefts, robberies and assaults.

From my understanding DS Bailey supposedly came into contact with the nerve agent when he went to the Ruskies house. He never went to the park. So why is this guy being hailed as a hero. 2 other police officers attended the Ruskies at the park and it's claimed they were mildly in contact with the nerve agent when giving first aid. So why aren't they hero's? This story stinks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

^ Well done, Troy. If only OhOh could be as helpful.

---

A link to his source, as required in World News?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

where he worked on

---

^
Would you believe a MSM source controlled by the Jews?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neverna

I am happy that he challenges the official narrative and it's up to him if he posts bullshit sourced from others (if he posts where he actually sourced the bullshit). But when he refuses to post the source of allegations or claims that he posts, it makes it appear that the allegation/claim/bullshit comes from OhOh himself, which has the stench of lies, fake news and trolling about it.

---

I agree it is good to have an alternative view point. But it should be backed up by credible sources. R.T. is about as credible as Fox news. For that matter just about any Russia based news source has been compromised by Czar Vlad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hugh Cow

R.T. is about as credible as Fox news

---

...rt correspondents OhOh and Friends may disagree...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomcat

...rt correspondents OhOh and Friends may disagree...

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tomcat

Originally Posted by Hugh Cow
R.T. is about as credible as Fox news
...rt correspondents OhOh and Friends may disagree...

---

When RT claims that 1+1 = 2, I am laughing.

When BBC claims 1+1 is highly likely 3, I take it ...