Thread: Britons who join Islamic State should be hunted and killed: defence minister

I could see 3rd World countries like China, Russia and India doing away with returning and maybe even domestic jihadists, but not the UK. As I said before, Europe is way too 'civilised' to survive modern times.

Europe is way too 'civilised' to survive modern times.

Indeed, those ragheads would take us back to the stone age given half a chance.

Once they joined the Islamic state they are no longer 'British' and as foreign combatants they only have the right to a trial at best, but a bullet in the head is better, they want to be martyrs anyway.

So you don't believe in the British justice system then.

Interesting.

Of course not it's far too soft and PC these days

So you are a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law then.

Interesting.

Wanna know who else is a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law? Yep, ISIS.

No point in a reply, your mate in CM would just delete it

Originally Posted by Neverna

Yeah, whateva. The European continent will disappear into the ether and other such nonsense by jabir-the-fake.

Can't be true, can it, Neverna, because you can't stomach the source or because you think it won't happen?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So you don't believe in the British justice system then.

Interesting.

Sounds like you do believe in the British justice system, even though it was not designed to cope with spectacularly different cultures/beliefs/behaviour?

Incoming...!

Originally Posted by jabir

Sounds like you do believe in the British justice system

Sure, why not, what's the alternative?

Summary execution like ISIS and xanax and other extremists want?

Originally Posted by jabir

even though it was not designed to cope with spectacularly different cultures/beliefs/behaviour?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Summary execution like ISIS and xanax and other extremists want?

...or: a fair trial and then a summary execution...pour encourager les autres...

Originally Posted by taxexile

Indeed, those ragheads would take us back to the stone age given half a chance.

And what they are aiming for is pretty clear to anyone but the hard of thinking...

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So you are a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law then.

Interesting.

Wanna know who else is a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law? Yep, ISIS.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Sure, why not, what's the alternative?

Summary execution like ISIS and xanax and other extremists want?

Originally Posted by tomcat

...or: a fair trial and then a summary execution...pour encourager les autres...

summary execution noun
when a person is accused of a crime and then immediately killed without a trial

https://www.translegal.com/legal-eng...mary-execution

If you are in a battle with Islamic State, your objective is to put one between the eyes.

It doesn't matter a fuck if it's a Brit or a Syrian.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

If you are in a battle with Islamic State, your objective is to put one between the eyes.

It doesn't matter a fuck if it's a Brit or a Syrian.

To Brits and other 'civilised' folks it makes a big difference; could be right or wrong depending on which side you are on, but amusing to watch suckers dismiss reality in favour of clinging to the moral high ground.

It's all Obama's fault eh, jabir? For embracing "Islam"s sharia agenda"!

Originally Posted by jabir

to watch suckers dismiss reality in favour of clinging to the moral high ground

It's not moral high ground, it's moral level ground.

After all if you're so ready to suspend or dismiss the rule of law then what makes 'you' any better than 'them'.

Because he's not a 'paki', silly.

Just pretends to be one.

I'm still giggling to myself over Nev's "jabir-the-fake" quip.

Originally Posted by Neverna

It's all Obama's fault eh, jabir? For embracing "Islam"s sharia agenda"!

Please, since when has any ameristani "democratically elected leader" stopped killing anyone because it wasn't legal.

Nothing to do with creating ........ a new bogey man to keep the MIC and banks happy.

Maybe Israel can take them in, they seem to like them.

Originally Posted by jabir

I could see 3rd World countries like China, Russia and India doing away with returning and maybe even domestic jihadists, but not the UK. As I said before, Europe is way too 'civilised' to survive modern times.

Ohhh the irony of it all. Which continent, especially the UK and France, have been at the forefront of massacring civilians for the last 20 years all around the middle east and Africa ... for FREEDOM?

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

So you are a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law then.

Interesting.

Wanna know who else is a proponent of summary / extrajudicial killings and against the rule of law? Yep, ISIS.

Some might argue worse than ISIS - at least they pretend to be following some sort of law when they do it, even if it is a saudi madrasas taught bastardisation of the so called law.

Originally Posted by tomcat

.. ..pour encourager les autres...

Ahh so the pen of your aunt is in the garden, Eh?

Originally Posted by Neverna

It's all Obama's fault eh, jabir? For embracing "Islam"s sharia agenda"!

I see no connection, but whatever gets you off.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

It's not moral high ground, it's moral level ground.

After all if you're so ready to suspend or dismiss the rule of law then what makes 'you' any better than 'them'.

Not at all, the rule of law is what stabilises, secures and separates what we have from what could otherwise be. But one perspective suggests it should be modified to address changing times.

Originally Posted by cyrille

Because he's not a 'paki', silly.

Just pretends to be one.

Me a Paki...ffs!