Thread: Waitress' tip denied; homophobic note left as gratuity

Originally Posted by misskit

Waitress in the USA are paid a fraction of minimum wage. Their pay comes from tips. It is not optional.

Sorry Kit. It is optional. A service charge can be included in the bill - it's your choice whether or not to patronize restaurants that do so. If no service charge is included in the bill, TIPPING IS TOTALLY OPTIONAL. PERIOD.

The fact that these people work for less than the minimum wage is their choice - and their problem - not mine.

The customer who left the comment was doing the waitress ( is that un PC ?) a favour ; perhaps many customers before have not tipped her due to her faggy dress and behavior.
Surely she should be thankfull that she now knows why.

Much Ado About Nothing

-William Shakespeare

circa 1598

She must have been a bundle of fun in the Marines,where her fellow Marines happy to serve alongside her.

Morales looks normal and healthy here



compared to today
I wonder exactly when she contracted gayness ?




Here's another shot , bitch don't like smiling much .

Whats that scribble on her fingers say ?
Maybe that's the 'lifestyle' the customer who refused to tip was referring to ?

Excellent point, and I haven't seen Morales refering to herself as homosexual.

Originally Posted by Mid

I served in the Marines to keep ignorant people like them free."

the sad thing is she believes it

I wouldn't care much if my waitress was a carpet muncher as long as she did the job well and washed her hands.

thats the problem.

with homosexuals you just dont know if those fingers have been knuckle deep in their boyfriends tradesmans entrance an hour before they are sprinkling coriander into your soup, but with carpet munchers at least the risks are not as sickening.

Originally Posted by blue

Homosexuality has being unlisted as a disease.

Homos can get married.

Homos have more than equal rights in getting jobs , social housing etc .

Homos can adopt vulnerable children , in a bizzar PC experiment.

Homos have special protection under the law , the police will respond to an incident involving them faster - as it's considered a hate crime .

50% of the population has been brainwashed into thinking homos are normal.

Are they happy ?
no , they want a 100% victory like the fascists they are, they will try and stamp out any signs of dissent with thier nazi jackboots .
In their terms they are obliged to ''challenge'' any signs of people not following the PC way .
The sooner a cure is found for homosexuality the better.

Why do you care so much?

Originally Posted by taxexile

thats the problem.

with homosexuals you just dont know if those fingers have been knuckle deep in their boyfriends tradesmans entrance an hour before they are sprinkling coriander into your soup, but with carpet munchers at least the risks are not as sickening.

And why would straight waiters or waitresses not bother you then? Wouldnt they have the same standards of hygiene?

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by blue

Homosexuality has being unlisted as a disease.

Homos can get married.

Homos have more than equal rights in getting jobs , social housing etc .

Homos can adopt vulnerable children , in a bizzar PC experiment.

Homos have special protection under the law , the police will respond to an incident involving them faster - as it's considered a hate crime .

50% of the population has been brainwashed into thinking homos are normal.

Are they happy ?
no , they want a 100% victory like the fascists they are, they will try and stamp out any signs of dissent with thier nazi jackboots .
In their terms they are obliged to ''challenge'' any signs of people not following the PC way .
The sooner a cure is found for homosexuality the better.

Why do you care so much?

I had a medical condition called Homophobia which faggots aggravate, making me feel ill; if the homos got cured , or at least locked up , then It would be better for me .

Plus I dislike seeing people dying and suffering world wide from AIDS ,
normal people - men, women and children, a disease which the gays brought on the world via their sick obession with other mens bloody arseholes .

Also I'm a humanist libratarian : I like helping people and I find it sad to see human beings debase and lower themselves with filthy practices like homosexuality , Similarily I hate to see silly liberals egging the gays on instead of telling them to pull themselves together .

Perhaps a better question to ask is
Why do you care so little ?

telling them to pull themselves together .

..... and thats another disgusting practice.

Originally Posted by blue

I had a medical condition called Homophobia which faggots aggravate, making me feel ill; if the homos got cured , or at least locked up , then It would be better for me .

Plus I dislike seeing people dying and suffering world wide from AIDS ,
normal people - men, women and children, a disease which the gays brought on the world via their sick obession with other mens bloody arseholes .

Also I'm a humanist libratarian : I like helping people and I find it sad to see human beings debase and lower themselves with filthy practices like homosexuality , Similarily I hate to see silly liberals egging the gays on instead of telling them to pull themselves together .

Perhaps a better question to ask is
Why do you care so little ?

But blue, anal sex isn't the most successful way to get HIV, blood transfusions are. Anal sex is the most dangerous kind of sex for us because we are quite a healthy bunch, but vaginal sex is more dangerous when ulcers or other veneral diseases are present. This is certainly more frequently the case in Africa. Can't blame the gays for HIV, it would have spread to women in any case. Gotta blame the Africans who eat monkeys.

Originally Posted by Rainfall

But blue, anal sex isn't the most successful way to get HIV, blood transfusions are.

Blood used in transfusions is screened and tested for HIV before use , so there isnt a risk of catching HIV from blood transfusions .

^
I think that should have read.

"Bloods used in transfusions are usually screened and tested for HIV before use , so there shouldn`t be a risk of catching HIV from blood transfusions, although its not unheard of.

OK, so where is unscreened blood used in transfusions ?
Which Hospitals use unscreened blood ?

You mean you`ve never heard of hospitals screwing up? People contracting AIDS from a transfusion? It has happened and will happen again.

It was common in the early years of AIDS, before mandatory screening. Here is the first Non-African woman who got infected with HIV, died in 1977. facts about Grethe Rask - Evi

And here is the European pedigree of HIV, a heterosexual man who loved prostitutes, possibly infected some of them, and they passed it on. Died 1976. His wife and daughter a year later. Arvid Noe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But there is blood screening now a days , which means that a blood transfusion is safer than anal sex when it comes to contracting HIV .You posted that you are more likely to contract HIV from a blood transfusion rather than from anal sex, which is incorrect

Originally Posted by Rainfall

Originally Posted by blue

I had a medical condition called Homophobia which faggots aggravate, making me feel ill; if the homos got cured , or at least locked up , then It would be better for me .

Plus I dislike seeing people dying and suffering world wide from AIDS ,
normal people - men, women and children, a disease which the gays brought on the world via their sick obession with other mens bloody arseholes .

Also I'm a humanist libratarian : I like helping people and I find it sad to see human beings debase and lower themselves with filthy practices like homosexuality , Similarily I hate to see silly liberals egging the gays on instead of telling them to pull themselves together .

Perhaps a better question to ask is
Why do you care so little ?

But blue, anal sex isn't the most successful way to get HIV, blood transfusions are. Anal sex is the most dangerous kind of sex for us because we are quite a healthy bunch, but vaginal sex is more dangerous when ulcers or other veneral diseases are present. This is certainly more frequently the case in Africa. Can't blame the gays for HIV, it would have spread to women in any case. Gotta blame the Africans who eat monkeys.

Don't worry I do also blame the africans for eating monkies-
some butcher getting a slight cut and getting infected.

But it was the homo airline stewards with hundreds of partners a year who brought the virus to USA, notably San Fransico where there was many sauna orgy rooms at the time.
( These were banned shortly after aids exploded, but are probably back up and running in PC USA.)
Here the gays had multiple partners with unprotected sex .
There was heat , ruptured bloody arseholes , sweat , body fluids , shit., amyle nitrate and other drugs , it was the perfect place for AIDS to develop and become more virulant ; and it did so .

So yes i can blame gays .
And it's only a matter of time before they concoct another STD.

Maybe she was jealous of the family and was reconsidering her lifestyle choice by being a bitchy, manic waitress. Solemn faced putting plates down and not placing them etc.
A lot of dykes are messed in the head. Either through too much sausage or being left on the shelf.
CCC

Originally Posted by Fluke

But there is blood screening now a days , which means that a blood transfusion is safer than anal sex when it comes to contracting HIV .You posted that you are more likely to contract HIV from a blood transfusion rather than from anal sex, which is incorrect

You are right, I didn't elaborate what I meant. The risk to catch HIV with a transfusion of contaminated blood is 85%. That's very high, many of the remaining 15% are protected by natural immunity. The risk to catch it by unprotected receptive anal sex is 0.2% or 0.5%, so one has to do it multiple times to turn the odds against you.