ENT
Your red calling me a two faced wanker just goes to show how truly confused you are.
Poor thing.
^ Do what I advised Moony to do, GOOGLE!
The info is all in the public domain.
Caller ID and location was available way back.
Even Blackberry had it up untill recently.
Newer versions of various brands have this facility as an option.
Police use this ability ALL the time.
Paranoid now?
it was certainly not avaible on any phones, even to the cops 10 years ago, which is integral to the issue here. You said you were location tracking other mobiles in 2001.
You weren't.
Why would you say that?
I think ENT is like 14 years old.
Seems to lack general knowledge and common sense.
ENT has....shall we say.....a loose relationship with facts.
So he doesn't like being pinned down to specific ones...
Perhaps it's an artist thing
You are too frightened even to look up the info on the net.
The system was publicly available ever since 2001, let alone to the PD
Simply because you were not aware of it does not imply anything other than you were not informed or just plain dumb.
Why would I mention the matter publicly?
Because it's a fact.
Now, lazy bones, just get some exercise and do some finger walking to find out the facts.
Any school kid in Chiangmai could tell you all about it, since they love their little gadgets.
I googled that ENT. You have an amazing habit of presenting information that works against your argument.
I found something that may be able to give the approximate city (whatever that means), and something else that might be able to give you further information by cross referencing through their database.
http://gizmodo.com/5070138/caller-id...incoming-calls
http://freevcalls.blogspot.com/2010/...er-id-for.html
ENT, allow me to explain how it works. Whenever you present information, that information is supposed to SUPPORT your argument. Try it sometime.
And lets not forget this all is about something he said he did in 2001.
So keep that in mind when you're researching.
This is most entertaining.
I'm getting a fair bit of vicarious enjoyment seeing other people getting caught up in ENT's convoluted thought patterns the way I did.
But actually, I'm going to stay out of this particular debate.
You won't pin him down to anything he said, you know. At least you will THINK you have (and you well may have), but he won't admit to it.
He's a slippery customer, and a great rationalizer.
From page 13 :
Last edited by Latindancer; 13-12-2011 at 08:27 PM.
We'll always have post #405 and
#428 to refer back to.
I notice he keeps trying to change the goal posts by refering to current technology when he clearly said he did that about 2001 and we have the posts to refer to.
GPS phones. 2004
Privacy Watch: Soon, Your Cell Phone May Be Tracking You | PCWorld
2004 it is stated that your phone MAY SOON be tracking you.
(and it is now) NOT 2001.
And people with access can track you through your phone now.
You can't track other people with your phone unless they want you to.
On my Nokia E71 I have google maps GPS. (and Nokia GPS if I want to pay)
It triangulates using satellites (I've been connected to up to 5 at a time)
If you have a google account and a phone that allows internet access and is GPS enabled as mine is, you can get 'latitude'.
Latitude will allow you to see where people who have agreed to allow you, and who also have latitude and the features I mentioned, to see where they are.
Google Latitude
You can't track or locate people unless they also have these features and ALLOW YOU, Even today unless you use a computer
http://www.trackapartner.com/index3.php
So your claim to be tracking the location of incoming calls in 2001 is bullshit ENT.
WHY ARE YOU BULLSHITTING US?
Last edited by Cujo; 14-12-2011 at 09:25 AM.
Caller ID location 2001
Patent US7269413 - Telephone location caller ID - Google Patents
^Give him a gold star, maybe that will calm him down.
this thread is stupid enough to be in "Issues"
please relocate
Andy....Sssshhhhhh !
We're waiting with bated breath. The answer is going to be interesting.![]()
^ All started back in the 1990's as the article points out,
So you can now admit that the tracking goes on, and if you read the article linked.
As I stated, it all IS not "was" GPS monitored, you dodgy little twister.
Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.
What, you're connected to < 5 satellites at a time?
Does it hurt?
Hope your phone wasn't jealous mate.
You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self, attempting to appear clever, bad ploy, any one reading through these last few pages can see what an arse you're making of yourself.
Even with readable data on the technology presented to you, you are still in denial of reality. Never mind, you'll get over it.
America was not the first in every field you know, this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.
Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.
Now calm down before you melt down Koojo.
Remember, you think something BIG is gonna happen today.
Better put on your tinfoil hat, the satellites may try and "connect" to you again.![]()
They have the capability to track people.
They don't track everyone all the time.
Show me where I denied the existence of the technology?Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.
I'm saying you weren't location tracking incoming calls on your handheld Nokia in 2001 and you're still not doing it unless the caller is allowing you.
I never denied spy and surveilance agencies could do it.
ONLY YOU ON YOUR HANDHELD NOKIA. (IN 2001) LIAR.
What statements?You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self
What 'tech' are you talking about?this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.
You certainly weren't location tracking incoming calls from your mobile phone in 2001 and you're still not unless you have google location and the caller does as well and ALLOWS you.
So just admit you're a dirty lying little maggot and I'll leave you alone.
(Maybe there are other similar programs out there now than location. Does iPhone have any tracking apps.)
Christ almighty you idiot, that had nothing to do with phones.Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.![]()
THEY WERE HOVERING OVERHEAD IN A FUCKING HELICOPTER![]()
![]()
Last edited by Cujo; 14-12-2011 at 10:04 AM.
Oh, oh, you'd better get your tinfoil hat back on again Koojo, not only have you got satellites connecting to you, but now you've got some helicopters bothering you.
Oh it's a BIG day for you, as you predicted!
Be careful, THEY may start to take an interest in your rants if you get too extreme, buddy.![]()
Respond to the specific issue, ENT
And don't try being disingenuous. A factoid is a pseudo fact. It describes the bullshit statement you just made regarding O J Simpson's car being tracked by his phone's location.
Last edited by Latindancer; 14-12-2011 at 10:17 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)