Thread: This guy is fuking insane!

And lets not forget this all is about something he said he did in 2001.
So keep that in mind when you're researching.

We'll always have post #405 and
#428 to refer back to.
I notice he keeps trying to change the goal posts by refering to current technology when he clearly said he did that about 2001 and we have the posts to refer to.

GPS phones. 2004


Privacy Watch: Soon, Your Cell Phone May Be Tracking You | PCWorld

Caller ID location 2001


Patent US7269413 - Telephone location caller ID - Google Patents

He's persistent, let's give him that!

^Give him a gold star, maybe that will calm him down.

Originally Posted by ENT

Around 2001 in NZ,

Note the date

I started tracking location

Tracking?

of all recerved calls by simply looking at my phone window

,I assume you mean screen

the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x"

,
so little words scrolled across the screen telling you the location of the caller?

allowing me to monitor the time and locus

what is locus?

of call to time of arrival of caller.

Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So caller ID and location of the caller were displayed and you could track the call as well?

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.

Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

GPS monitored? In 2001?
And on what handy little nokia model was this?

Like I said, even now a phone may tell you what Cell tower you are receiving/transmitting from but it will NOT tell you what cell the caller is receiving/transmitting through.

It can be done but not by your phone.
and certainly not in 2001.

Now justify your bullshit you little wanker.
Why are you bullshitting us?

this thread is stupid enough to be in "Issues"

please relocate

Andy....Sssshhhhhh !
We're waiting with bated breath. The answer is going to be interesting.

^ All started back in the 1990's as the article points out,

So you can now admit that the tracking goes on, and if you read the article linked.

As I stated, it all IS not "was" GPS monitored, you dodgy little twister.

Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.

What, you're connected to < 5 satellites at a time?
Does it hurt?

Hope your phone wasn't jealous mate.

You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self, attempting to appear clever, bad ploy, any one reading through these last few pages can see what an arse you're making of yourself.

Even with readable data on the technology presented to you, you are still in denial of reality. Never mind, you'll get over it.

America was not the first in every field you know, this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.

Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.

Now calm down before you melt down Koojo.

Remember, you think something BIG is gonna happen today.

Better put on your tinfoil hat, the satellites may try and "connect" to you again.

See how Thailand fits into ECHELON

Signals intelligence by alliances, nations and industries - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Originally Posted by ENT

Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.

Good example of how ENT throws in "factoids" for us "normaloids"

Originally Posted by ENT

See how Thailand fits into ECHELON

Signals intelligence by alliances, nations and industries - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up ent.

Originally Posted by ENT
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.

Originally Posted by Koojo

Originally Posted by ENT

So you can now admit that the tracking goes on,

They have the capability to track people.
They don't track everyone all the time.

Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.

Show me where I denied the existence of the technology?
I'm saying you weren't location tracking incoming calls on your handheld Nokia in 2001 and you'[re still not doing it unless the caller is allowing you.
I never denied spy and surveilance agencies could do it.
ONLY YOU ON YOUR HANDHELD NOKIA. LIAR. (IN 2001)

You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self

,
What statements?

this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.

What 'tech' are you talking about?
You certainly weren't location tracking incoming calls from your mobile phone in 2001 and you're still not unless you have google location and the caller does as well and ALLOWS you.
So just admit you're a dirty lying little maggot and I'll leave you alone.
(Maybe there are other similar programs out there now than location. Does iPhone have any tracking apps.)

Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.

Christ almighty you idiot, that had nothing to do with phones.
THEY WERE HOVERING OVERHEAD IN A FUCKING HELICOPTER

Oh, oh, you'd better get your tinfoil hat back on again Koojo, not only have you got satellites connecting to you, but now you've got some helicopters bothering you.

Oh it's a BIG day for you, as you predicted!

Be careful, THEY may start to take an interest in your rants if you get too extreme, buddy.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Originally Posted by ENT

Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it.

Good example of how ENT throws in "factoids" for us "normaloids"

Here's another believer, thinks there are factoids!

What the heck are they, LD?

PAY ATTENTION ENT

We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up ent.

Originally Posted by ENT
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.

Here's a link to covert surveillanceact ammendments USA after 9/112001


Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Originally Posted by ENT

Here's a link to covert surveillanceact ammendments USA after 9/112001


Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We Know all about it ENT, do you think we live under rocks?
But that's not what we're talking about is it.

This

Originally Posted by ENT
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

Is what we're talking about.

PAY ATTENTION ENT

We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up.

Originally Posted by ENT
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.

So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.

It all is GPS monitored.

When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.

You can't go dropping little turds like this around the place and then behaving as if they're not there and don't stink and not clearing them up.

Originally Posted by Latindancer

Respond to the specific issue, ENT



And don't try being disingenuous. A factoid is a pseudo fact. It describes the bullshit statement you just made regarding O J Simpson's car being tracked by his phone's location.

That's in the link I posted that you (a believer) did not apparently read.

A factoid is not a fact.

Something printed and believed in.

A trivial piece of data.

The schooly in you is showing.

Words and references aren't facts, simply words, possibly factoids.

So, carry on.