And lets not forget this all is about something he said he did in 2001.
So keep that in mind when you're researching.
Printable View
And lets not forget this all is about something he said he did in 2001.
So keep that in mind when you're researching.
This is most entertaining.
I'm getting a fair bit of vicarious enjoyment seeing other people getting caught up in ENT's convoluted thought patterns the way I did.
But actually, I'm going to stay out of this particular debate.
You won't pin him down to anything he said, you know. At least you will THINK you have (and you well may have), but he won't admit to it.
He's a slippery customer, and a great rationalizer.
From page 13 :
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Since time is a concept used to measure work and life, it is often appropriate to refer to those two words synonymously.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer........ is they really ??? :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
We'll always have post #405 and
#428 to refer back to.
I notice he keeps trying to change the goal posts by refering to current technology when he clearly said he did that about 2001 and we have the posts to refer to.
GPS phones. 2004
Privacy Watch: Soon, Your Cell Phone May Be Tracking You | PCWorld
Caller ID location 2001
Patent US7269413 - Telephone location caller ID - Google Patents
He's persistent, let's give him that!
^Give him a gold star, maybe that will calm him down.
Note the dateQuote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Tracking?Quote:
I started tracking location
,I assume you mean screenQuote:
of all recerved calls by simply looking at my phone window
,Quote:
the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x"
so little words scrolled across the screen telling you the location of the caller?what is locus?Quote:
allowing me to monitor the time and locus
Quote:
of call to time of arrival of caller.
So caller ID and location of the caller were displayed and you could track the call as well?Quote:
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.
Quote:
So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.
GPS monitored? In 2001?Quote:
It all is GPS monitored.
And on what handy little nokia model was this?
Like I said, even now a phone may tell you what Cell tower you are receiving/transmitting from but it will NOT tell you what cell the caller is receiving/transmitting through.
It can be done but not by your phone.
and certainly not in 2001.
Now justify your bullshit you little wanker.
Why are you bullshitting us?
2004 it is stated that your phone MAY SOON be tracking you.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
(and it is now) NOT 2001.
And people with access can track you through your phone now.
You can't track other people with your phone unless they want you to.
On my Nokia E71 I have google maps GPS. (and Nokia GPS if I want to pay)
It triangulates using satellites (I've been connected to up to 5 at a time)
If you have a google account and a phone that allows internet access and is GPS enabled as mine is, you can get 'latitude'.
Latitude will allow you to see where people who have agreed to allow you, and who also have latitude and the features I mentioned, to see where they are.
Google Latitude
You can't track or locate people unless they also have these features and ALLOW YOU, Even today unless you use a computer
http://www.trackapartner.com/index3.php
So your claim to be tracking the location of incoming calls in 2001 is bullshit ENT.
WHY ARE YOU BULLSHITTING US?
this thread is stupid enough to be in "Issues"
please relocate
Andy....Sssshhhhhh !
We're waiting with bated breath. The answer is going to be interesting.:chitown:
:rofl:
^ All started back in the 1990's as the article points out, :)
So you can now admit that the tracking goes on, and if you read the article linked.
As I stated, it all IS not "was" GPS monitored, you dodgy little twister.
Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it. :rolleyes:
What, you're connected to < 5 satellites at a time?
Does it hurt? :)
Hope your phone wasn't jealous mate. :mid:
You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self, attempting to appear clever, bad ploy, any one reading through these last few pages can see what an arse you're making of yourself.
Even with readable data on the technology presented to you, you are still in denial of reality. Never mind, you'll get over it.
America was not the first in every field you know, this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.
Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it. :)
Now calm down before you melt down Koojo.
Remember, you think something BIG is gonna happen today. :rofl:
Better put on your tinfoil hat, the satellites may try and "connect" to you again. :rolleyes:
See how Thailand fits into ECHELON
Signals intelligence by alliances, nations and industries - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
They have the capability to track people.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
They don't track everyone all the time.
Show me where I denied the existence of the technology?Quote:
Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.
I'm saying you weren't location tracking incoming calls on your handheld Nokia in 2001 and you're still not doing it unless the caller is allowing you.
I never denied spy and surveilance agencies could do it.
ONLY YOU ON YOUR HANDHELD NOKIA. (IN 2001) LIAR.
What statements?Quote:
You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self
What 'tech' are you talking about?Quote:
this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.
You certainly weren't location tracking incoming calls from your mobile phone in 2001 and you're still not unless you have google location and the caller does as well and ALLOWS you.
So just admit you're a dirty lying little maggot and I'll leave you alone.
(Maybe there are other similar programs out there now than location. Does iPhone have any tracking apps.)
Christ almighty you idiot, that had nothing to do with phones.Quote:
Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it. :)
THEY WERE HOVERING OVERHEAD IN A FUCKING HELICOPTER :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Good example of how ENT throws in "factoids" for us "normaloids"Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up ent.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...s/viewpost.gif
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.
So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.
It all is GPS monitored.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoojoThey have the capability to track people.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
They don't track everyone all the time.
Show me where I denied the existence of the technology?Quote:
Where you previously denied the existence of such a technology, you now happily waffle on as if you're some sort of an expert on it.
I'm saying you weren't location tracking incoming calls on your handheld Nokia in 2001 and you'[re still not doing it unless the caller is allowing you.
I never denied spy and surveilance agencies could do it.
ONLY YOU ON YOUR HANDHELD NOKIA. LIAR. (IN 2001)
,Quote:
You hopelessly try and attribute statements that I originally made, to your self
What statements?
What 'tech' are you talking about?Quote:
this tech was available to the public of NZ from at least Nov 2001.
You certainly weren't location tracking incoming calls from your mobile phone in 2001 and you're still not unless you have google location and the caller does as well and ALLOWS you.
So just admit you're a dirty lying little maggot and I'll leave you alone.
(Maybe there are other similar programs out there now than location. Does iPhone have any tracking apps.)
Christ almighty you idiot, that had nothing to do with phones.Quote:
Even in the USA, the cops were able to track O J Simpson around on his crazy car ride. Didn't you read that bit? Well before 2001, wasn't it. :)
THEY WERE HOVERING OVERHEAD IN A FUCKING HELICOPTER :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Oh, oh, you'd better get your tinfoil hat back on again Koojo, not only have you got satellites connecting to you, but now you've got some helicopters bothering you.
Oh it's a BIG day for you, as you predicted!
Be careful, THEY may start to take an interest in your rants if you get too extreme, buddy. :ourrules:
Here's another believer, thinks there are factoids! :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by LatindancerGood example of how ENT throws in "factoids" for us "normaloids"Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
What the heck are they, LD?
Respond to the specific issue, ENT
And don't try being disingenuous. A factoid is a pseudo fact. It describes the bullshit statement you just made regarding O J Simpson's car being tracked by his phone's location.
PAY ATTENTION ENT
We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up ent.
When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...s/viewpost.gif
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.
So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.
It all is GPS monitored.
Here's a link to covert surveillanceact ammendments USA after 9/112001
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We Know all about it ENT, do you think we live under rocks?Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
But that's not what we're talking about is it.
This
Is what we're talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...s/viewpost.gif
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.
So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.
It all is GPS monitored.
PAY ATTENTION ENT
We can't move forward until we clear this little turd up.
When you have satisfactorily explain this lot, or admitted it's a complete fabrication and satisfactorily explained why you're trying to bullshit us with nonsense like this, then we can move on.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT https://teakdoor.com/images/td_defaul...s/viewpost.gif
Around 2001 in NZ, I started tracking location of all recerved calls by simply lookingv at
my phone window, the little words would track across, saying that the call was being sent from point "x", allowing me to monitor the time and locus of call to time of arrival of caller.
Identity of caller piece (Ph#) was also displayed.
So I knew if I had to set my dogs on guard or send out a scout in an unmarked vehicle to intercept and nail an undesirable etc if so called upon to do so.
Simple system.
It all is GPS monitored.
You can't go dropping little turds like this around the place and then behaving as if they're not there and don't stink and not clearing them up.
That's in the link I posted that you (a believer) did not apparently read.Quote:
Originally Posted by Latindancer
A factoid is not a fact.
Something printed and believed in.
A trivial piece of data.
The schooly in you is showing. :)
Words and references aren't facts, simply words, possibly factoids.
So, carry on.