I think it's time for a coup in Venezuela![]()
I think it's time for a coup in Venezuela![]()
well Chavez hasn't done anything wrong and he is a war hero unlike others.
How about a coup in the US for regime change ? well deserved. Maybe we could ask China for assistance.
Last edited by Butterfly; 23-09-2006 at 09:41 AM.
I was watching the Communist News Network (CNN) this morning and there are some striking similarities between the two. The most notable difference though being that Chavez mostly doesn't follow through on his promises to the poor. The most striking similarity being that the majority of the "educated" thinking he is hurting their country and tearing down everything they built.
Ceburat ... in comparing the two countries and two leaders I don't see how one could reach any other eventual conclusion. Chavez is only in power because of the uneduated masses as was Thaksin. The middle class, educated class and wealthy are not happy with Chavez.
When you have an oil rich country with 80% of the population being poor, you know that the rich elite haven't being entirely honnest in the management of the country. I think Chavez is doing the right thing. The rich wants to keep their privileges and abuse the system while leaving bits to the poor. How is this bad ? don't you believe in heros anymore ?
You can give the poor everything & they'll piss it against the wall. The rich, get richer, but also invest in growing the economy.
Which one is best?
you mean investing in yatch, Ferraris and Gucci bags !!! oh yeah, that's not pissing it against the wall.Originally Posted by watterinja
while using the money to help starving children or education wouldn't be useful.
Which one is better I ask again ?
believing anything on the US CNN is a little naive SK
Chavez is a popular hero as he is actually addressing the poverty in Venezuela
Of course the Bush admin don't like him as he does not seem to be kissing their butt, as they require. All countries must support the US policies otherwise they are threatened with "being blown back to the stoneage"
I have reported your post
One of the reasons the Bush administration hates Chavez is because he asked Exxon and other foreign companies to pay more taxes for working in Venezuela.
Under a former deal made with previouse government, Exxon pays 1% in taxes for all of their operations.
Yes, that's right: 1%
Chavez is now going out of his way to annoy Bush+
being a democratically elected leader of his country, all they can do is sit back and fume.....except for the CIA of course, who are desperately trying all sorts of tricks to discredit him
Bush+ does not hesitate to try to destroy democratically elected goverments, because they are not the correct result, like Palestine
never mind the people, what about the power
Correct.
Hamas was democratically elected. The elections were monitored by independent, foreign organizations.
Evo Morales was democratically elected and Bush stated his country 'was moving away from democracy.'
Very strange statement.
Question: if Bush wants the spread of demoracy throughout the world, why does he do business with China?
Bush only wants goverments he can control, obviously
well, not Bush, but the people behind the throne
his recent remark that "he had not heard that Pakistan was threatened by one of his senior staffers" does tend to make him look even more foolish
Chavez was good at playing up to the audience
Bush already tried a coup against Chavez and it failed miserabley. Little wonder that Chavez takes the piss out of the alcoholic.
Is bush a boozer? Didn't know that
^ He quit drinking and snorting coke. But he never went to rehab. So, some think that's why he says and does what he says and does.
We just don't know.
he is drinking, and drinking hard. It's hopeless.
I would have to kill you if I told you
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)