Thread: New Zealanders presented with 40 flag options to vote for new national standard

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

That tells me that you struggle with reading comprehension...

Go find it yourself.

See, I knew it.

For one xanax it's your accusation, you back it up. If you believe that I'm lying and didn't say what I said I did then it would be quite a simple thing for you to prove. It's either in this thread or it isn't.

An admission by you of your mistake re. Moriori doesn't exist in this thread.

All you said was, " I accepted that error and learnt from it,"

S0 where did you admit your "error", as you put it?

Nowhere.

So of course you're lying, as there's nothing there to back up your claim.

Originally Posted by ENT

An admission by you of your mistake re. Moriori doesn't exist in this thread.

Yes it does, ENT. Go back and read the thread. I know you're of the school of thought that if you close your eyes really, really, really tightly that makes actual facts disappear but it doesn't actually work that way.

Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.

That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.

Originally Posted by ENT

So of course you're lying, as there's nothing there to back up your claim.

There is. You're confused again. There's actually nothing to back up yours and xanax's allegations.

But then that's because you're both a unfortunate mix of dishonest and not particularly bright.

I know this is a strange question have the kiwis picked a flag yet ?

Originally Posted by bobo746

I know this is a strange question have the kiwis picked a flag yet ?

Off-topic! Post reported!

Yes, well no... They stuck with the same / current one.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

An admission by you of your mistake re. Moriori doesn't exist in this thread.

Yes it does, ENT. Go back and read the thread.

Originally Posted by ENT

So of course you're lying, as there's nothing there to back up your claim.

The closest you got to recognizing or admitting your error was in;

Your post #218
"As to that actual point that SHamilton raised I could very well be wrong"

But no admission, just a maybe.

Originally Posted by ENT

The closest you got to recognizing or admitting your error was in;

Your post #218
"As to that actual point that SHamilton raised I could very well be wrong"

But no admission, just a maybe.

Nice selective quoting.

Let me guess, it's because you're now going to shift the goal posts to saying that selectively posted comment doesn't fit some arbitrary standard of yours that you've just now decided on.

Meanwhile...

Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.

That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.

*Crickets Chirping*

Further sophistry and obfuscation it is then. The question was rhetorical but asked and answered anyway. Cheers.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Originally Posted by ENT

The closest you got to recognizing or admitting your error was in;

Your post #218
"As to that actual point that SHamilton raised I could very well be wrong"

But no admission, just a maybe.

Nice selective quoting.

Cool.

Apology accepted.

Mind, for someone who spends so much time engaging in willful intellectual dishonesty you really are rather crap at it.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Apology accepted.

Mind, for someone who spends so much time engaging in willful intellectual dishonesty you really are rather crap at it.

What apology?

You're deluded.

Originally Posted by bobo746

I know this is a strange question have the kiwis picked a flag yet ?

Nah, they're largely sheeples, follow the leader, too scared to strike out on their own at home, conservative country.

No tall poppies in NZ.

Originally Posted by ENT

What apology?

You're deluded.

Too stupid to even recognise blatant sarcasm.

Figures.

Originally Posted by ENT

too scared to strike out on their own at home

This from the guy that monitored calls and sent out unmarked scout cars!

You live in an hermetically sealed environment, apparently.

Originally Posted by ENT

You live in an hermetically sealed environment, apparently.

Riiiiiiight*

Because monitoring phone calls, releasing the hounds, and sending out unmarked scout cars to intercept 'undesirables' who have inexplicably called you to say they're on their way (presumably to do undesirable things) is perfectly normal, reasonable and rational. Nothing at all bat shit crazy about it. At all.





* the extra "i's" are to stress the sarcasm.

Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.

That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.

*Crickets Given up Chirping, Packed up And Gone Home, Because bENT is Disingenuous, A Sophist, And Will Do Anything, No Matter How Patently Stupid and Silly, In Order to Avoid Having to Admit That He Was Wrong*

Wow!!!

Q.E.D.

Any has been proven a liar, claimed he admitted he was wrong, evidence says he only said he could be wrong, that's not admitting an error. He's a liar and a fantasist.

Anty has clearly wet his pants over being caught out as a liar again, have an early bath Anty and try to be a bit more honest in future