An admission by you of your mistake re. Moriori doesn't exist in this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
All you said was, " I accepted that error and learnt from it,"
S0 where did you admit your "error", as you put it?
Nowhere.
So of course you're lying, as there's nothing there to back up your claim.
Yes it does, ENT. Go back and read the thread. I know you're of the school of thought that if you close your eyes really, really, really tightly that makes actual facts disappear but it doesn't actually work that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.
That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.
There is. You're confused again. There's actually nothing to back up yours and xanax's allegations.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
But then that's because you're both a unfortunate mix of dishonest and not particularly bright.
I know this is a strange question have the kiwis picked a flag yet ?
Off-topic! Post reported! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by bobo746
Yes, well no... They stuck with the same / current one.
The closest you got to recognizing or admitting your error was in;Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Your post #218
"As to that actual point that SHamilton raised I could very well be wrong"
But no admission, just a maybe.
Nice selective quoting.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Let me guess, it's because you're now going to shift the goal posts to saying that selectively posted comment doesn't fit some arbitrary standard of yours that you've just now decided on.
Meanwhile...
*Crickets Chirping*Quote:
Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.
That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.
Further sophistry and obfuscation it is then. The question was rhetorical but asked and answered anyway. Cheers.
Cool. :chitown:Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
Apology accepted.
Mind, for someone who spends so much time engaging in willful intellectual dishonesty you really are rather crap at it.
What apology?Quote:
Originally Posted by AntRobertson
You're deluded.
Nah, they're largely sheeples, follow the leader, too scared to strike out on their own at home, conservative country.Quote:
Originally Posted by bobo746
No tall poppies in NZ.
Too stupid to even recognise blatant sarcasm.Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Figures.
This from the guy that monitored calls and sent out unmarked scout cars! :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
You live in an hermetically sealed environment, apparently.
Riiiiiiight*Quote:
Originally Posted by ENT
Because monitoring phone calls, releasing the hounds, and sending out unmarked scout cars to intercept 'undesirables' who have inexplicably called you to say they're on their way (presumably to do undesirable things) is perfectly normal, reasonable and rational. Nothing at all bat shit crazy about it. At all.
* the extra "i's" are to stress the sarcasm.
*Crickets Given up Chirping, Packed up And Gone Home, Because bENT is Disingenuous, A Sophist, And Will Do Anything, No Matter How Patently Stupid and Silly, In Order to Avoid Having to Admit That He Was Wrong*Quote:
Now then, are you prepared to admit and learn from your error about Moriori (and Waitaha for that matter) being pre-Maori settlers of NZ - the original point of contention - or are you just going to continue to engage in sophistry in order to try to obfuscate and avoid having to admit that you're wrong.
That question is very much intentionally rhetorical by the way.
Wow!!!
Q.E.D.
Any has been proven a liar, claimed he admitted he was wrong, evidence says he only said he could be wrong, that's not admitting an error. He's a liar and a fantasist.
Anty has clearly wet his pants over being caught out as a liar again, have an early bath Anty and try to be a bit more honest in future :)