Moog's Coming Out Thread

[withnallstoke]

A matting of hair and pubes is preferable to manscaping.

I don't mind the matting, it's the stench of sour semen in the morning i don't like.

It's not napalm ya know.

[baldrick]

^just get the dog to lick it off

Just be careful not to get any on your Apple Mac. Apple care ifs unlikely to cover the removal of wwj and other bodily secretions

[Gerbil]

A matting of hair and pubes is preferable to manscaping.

I don't mind the matting, it's the stench of sour semen in the morning i don't like.

Your own, or someone elses?

[taxexile]

causes more sticking-togetherness.

male leg shaving is nothing more than an affectation.

scrotum shaving however is hygienic and healthful, allowing the scrotum to remain at a lower temperature than if it was slowly poaching itself in the heat generated by it being shrouded by untrimmed pubage, and the feeling felt on a hot day when one abducts ones leg in order to slowly peel the scrotum away from its adherence to the upper thigh is quite blissful, or so i am told. nothing at all perverted about that.

a correct choice of underwear can reduce scrotum to thigh adhesion for those who would be embarrassed by performing a leg abduction in a public place.

[November Rain]

I wish them both all the best. Fry has had his set of demons to wrestle with and I truly hope he and his husband to be have a long, harmonious and happy life together

BTW, love all the comments about the age difference from TD ers. What is that Bible saying? Remove the beam from thine own eye.....

[baldrick]

^ I don't know about the bible saying but withnall has a saying about a AA battery and his japs eye

Hair is for heat regulation , so shaving your gonad sack will only lead to overcooked oysters

[taxexile]

I truly hope he and his husband to be have a long, harmonious and happy life

if this thread is to believed, they should be sticking together for a long while.

[patsycat]

along with all the PC luvvies exclaiming they all have poofs for friends .

I DO have pooves for friends.

In fact, all my friends are pooves.




And so is my husband.

Me too, i have pooves for friends. The only thing about your post is my husband thought i was a lesbo - all because i had lunch one day with an old school friend!! And he wasn't invited.

As far as Stephen Fry is concerned - i love watching IQ and his older things and wish him lots of happiness.

[Pragmatic]

I truly hope he and his husband

May be he's his wife? How the fook do you tell? With 'carpet munchers' one dresses female. The other male.




Ellen DeGeneres & Portia de Rossi.

[taxexile]

i would imagine fry is the giver and his catamite is the receiver.

[Gerbil]

Its all far too confusing for me.

[zygote1]

My daily mail link is blocked by the Ministry of Info. Is it just me?

[The Ghost Of The Moog]

i would imagine fry is the giver and his catamite is the receiver.

I doubt it. There is a structural lack of 'tops' in the fraternity. Most gay guys (85% vs 15%) prefer to be the receptacle. That's the pole position.

[ENT]

i would imagine fry is the giver and his catamite is the receiver.

I doubt it. There is a structural lack of 'tops' in the fraternity. Most gay guys (85% vs 15%) prefer to be the receptacle. That's the pole position.

The voice of experience? Personal observation?

[peterpan]

NR summed it up perfectly, I hope FR and his toy boy have great life together, Fry is a man with a high powered intellect and a entertainer.
I have liked him since the black adder days, and still now try to get any show he's is in.
Not my style, but not my call or business.

[ENT]

Why do queers get married?

Looking for holy sanction?

Well it ain't there, as marriage is a bond for procreation and the raising of offspring.

Any other reason is just a bit unrealistic.

[November Rain]

Well it ain't there, as marriage is a bond for procreation and the raising of offspring.

Should Mr NR and I get ours annulled then? I have never wanted my own children, yet this is the 2nd time I've been married. Soon, I'll be too old to have kids, anyway. Does that mean we as a couple have no right to be together legally? No right to love, comfort and security as a couple in our old age?

Same same but different, ENT

[taxexile]

people love their dogs, have no expectation of having children with them, and gain great comfort and security from them in their old age too.

[thaimeme]

Why do queers get married?

Looking for holy sanction?

Well it ain't there, as marriage is a bond for procreation and the raising of offspring.

Any other reason is just a bit unrealistic.

Perhaps God's a fag.

[taxexile]

Stephen Fry's fiance Elliott Spencer banned from driving for speeding at 101mph

By Agency2:36PM GMT 07 Jan 2015

Elliott Spencer, the new fiance of Stephen Fry, has been banned from driving for hitting 101mph in an Aston Martin worth £130,000.

The 27-year-old comedian broke the speed limit because Fry was late for a literature festival and told him to "get a move on", the court heard.

Fry, the 57-year-old QI presenter, was in court with his fiance - just a day after confirming their engagement - to support him as he tried to fight the one-week driving ban for speeding in a 70mph zone.
The couple were in a loaned Aston Martin DB9 when Fry told Spencer to "get a move on" because they were running late for his inaugural address as president of the Hay Festival of Literature and the Arts on the Welsh borders, magistrates were told.
A court heard a mobile speed camera caught Spencer at 101mph before the couple made it to the event with minutes to spare.
Related Articles
Stephen Fry and Elliott Spencer in London
Stephen Fry to marry 27-year-old boyfriend 06 Jan 2015
Stephen Fry: 260 animals have gay tendencies 05 Oct 2012
Fry quits Twitter as it is 'unsafe' for him to tweet 06 Nov 2014
Stephen Fry: I've done some appalling things 26 Sep 2014
Fry appeared in court for the 30-minute hearing as magistrates heard he was prepared to take to the witness box to provide a testimony for his fiance.
The court heard Fry also said that he takes "full responsibility" for the speeding.
Mark Wyeth QC, defending, said: "Mr Fry, who is Spencer's partner, was due as the new president of the literature festival and was due that afternoon to give his inaugural address.

"They hit a large backlog of traffic and in a moment of indiscretion Mr Fry suggested to Spencer that he might like to get a move on.

"No other drivers were inconvenienced and he eventually did make it by a matter of a few minutes, in time for the festival. Mr Fry assumes all responsibility because it was his decision that made Spencer put his foot down."

Mr Fry and his husband-to-be were driving from London to the festival on May bank holiday when they were caught near Newport, South Wales.

They were driving the white Aston Martin, which they had loaned out for a month to see if they wanted to buy one, when they were caught by a speed camera.

Mr Wyeth said: "The Aston Martin plainly did not belong to Spencer. It was on loan because they were interested in buying such a vehicle, but they did not for obvious reasons.

"What happened here was unfamiliarity with a vehicle which is extremely powerful and which they had had for just a few days."

Cwmbran magistrates court heard Spencer has an "unblemished record" and a clean driver's licence, which he has held for five years.

At the time of the offence, he was working as a voluntary support teacher in Surrey for children with learning difficulties, but Mr Wyeth said "in light of recent circumstances" he has now left that job.

Magistrates gave him the seven-day ban and told him to pay a £100 fine, with £85 costs and a £20 victim surcharge.

JP's chairman Phillip Walker told Spencer: "You increased your speed because you were late for an important engagement. You face a disqualification, but we are persuaded that this can be at the lower end of the scale."

Fry was in a jovial mood and signed autographs and posed for selfies inside the court building before the hearing.

As the magistrates considered their decision, he teased Spencer - telling him he was "probably facing a stretch in jail".

After the case, Fry said the time since announcing their engagement has been "wonderful" and that they planned to tie the knot within the next year.

He said: "It's been wonderful. We've not fixed a date and if I had I wouldn't tell you! But I can say it will be sometime within the next year or so.

"As is the way with these things, it became public when we filled in the paperwork. It was probably a bit much to expect a quiet ceremony."

Mr Fry said that Hay was a "wonderful festival", but the traffic on the day had been awful.

He added: "I was due on stage at 2.30pm and we arrived at the festival site at 2.28pm. Peter Florence, the Hay Festival director, was on stage waiting for me and there was a tent full of people.

"I thought I might have to ask him to court today to explain what had happened."
He also joked with court staff about Wales' love of rugby and claimed he would come back to Cwmbran - but the couple would drive more carefully next time.
After the hearing, Spencer said: "I would like to thank the court staff for their courtesy towards me today. I apologise for my driving."

fry can be an obnoxious limelight loving old queen when he chooses.

[ENT]

Well it ain't there, as marriage is a bond for procreation and the raising of offspring.

Should Mr NR and I get ours annulled then? I have never wanted my own children, yet this is the 2nd time I've been married. Soon, I'll be too old to have kids, anyway. Does that mean we as a couple have no right to be together legally? No right to love, comfort and security as a couple in our old age?

Same same but different, ENT

Marriage is a formal and (usually) public declaration of a couple's bond, first practiced by the aristocracy to safeguard family wealth then taken up by the hoi polloi in imitation of their 'betters'. Until then common law unions were the norm, lasting usually as long as the kids needed supporting.

As a couple, there's no hindrance to your right to be together as it is, so why the pseudo-religious farce of a wedding?

Isn't your trust and commitment to each other enough? Is a marriage certificate going to improve your chances of domestic and erotic success?

Of course not.

For some couples, public acclaim and recognition of their union, as in a marriage celebration, serves to protect them from outside influences, but really, it's up to the couple's personal integrity if the marriage is going to survive, and no amount of wedding bells and confetti is going to make any difference.

At the same time, I wish you and your hubby, and Peter and his hubby/wife all the best, but marriage per se is a totally unnecessary institution, and in the case of gheys, the situation is totally laughable.

[BaitongBoy]

Perhaps God's a fag.

What if God was one of us,
Just a slob like one of us...

[ENT]

^ I don't know about the bible saying but withnall has a saying about a AA battery and his japs eye

Hair is for heat regulation , so shaving your gonad sack will only lead to overcooked oysters

True.

[ENT]

Perhaps God's a fag.

What if God was one of us,
Just a slob like one of us...

"god" is just that, a human concept of an ideal, and as humans go, the ideal's a projected mix of human failings and aspirations.

Yup, as slobby as we are, so is our 'god'.

[The Ghost Of The Moog]

i would imagine fry is the giver and his catamite is the receiver.

I doubt it. There is a structural lack of 'tops' in the fraternity. Most gay guys (85% vs 15%) prefer to be the receptacle. That's the pole position.

The voice of experience? Personal observation?

That's your best humorous response to the set-up line is it?

'Taking about yourself are you, hur hur'

Sort of cookie-cutter response an average 12 year old might manage. Come up with something funnier!