
Originally Posted by
harrybarracuda
What you omit is the decryption effort required to clone the chip. Whilst it's simple enough if you can load a Windows program and follow instructions, it is a deterrent to those criminals that can and do simply swipe and duplicate the mag strip with the press of a button.
So I'll say it again: Smartcards are harder to clone.
Of course it also depends on how your bank has chosen to implement the technology.
However, I do agree that it is nowhere near as secure as it needs to be.
This made me laugh when I heard about it. They release technology before they do their homework.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=-St_ltH90Oc
'Arry, all card data is encrypted, but copy/paste transfers it from one medium to another. Chipped cards are - as you say - encrypted more securely, but copy/paste still transfers all of the data from one medium to another.
So I'll say it again: Smartcards are no harder to clone than magstrip cards.
I am no computer buff, but for example: A bitmap image is smaller and far less complex than a 700mb movie file, but it takes no more effort to copy/paste it from one folder to another.
More secure, futuristic encryption or whatever other tags the banks use to generate confidence become irrelevant, when the effort required to clone either type of card remains the same.
The 'deterrent' you mention, which indicates that cardco propaganda does work, is that they made a big deal about building a fortress in preparation for the ongoing siege, but didn't bother to mention it would be made of cardboard. This may have deterred a few people in the distance, but the real enemy had its hoses ready before it was even completed.