H'mm. watched the Premier League recently (nah, not the boring game- the supporters). We're all tribal- it's just a matter of degree.Originally Posted by Toby451
Should we really be surprised that a group of people who were launched pretty much straight from a hunter/ gatherer subsistence culture to a currency based market economy, are going to have difficulty assimilating? Similarly, should we be surprised that cultures that had developed a tradition and history of trading (and hence, specialisation), and a medium of exchange (currency) have found it a lot easier to adjust to our imposed western style liberal democracy & free market trade sector than nomadics and subsistence gatherers?
We had the slight leap on them of proceeding via foreign colony status, absolute monarchy, feudalism, aristocracy, and laissez faire capitalism in our ascent from itinerant tribes to liberal democrats. But it remains the fact even in our society that a small proportion of it's members own or control the vast majority of it's wealth, and also that there is a stark difference in this wealth distribution along ethnic (so tribal) lines. The djoo's and the chinee prosper wherever they go, blacks rarely so. Our society rewards it's merchant class well, perhaps too well. The brits were indeed a nation of shopkeepers- and that is why they became the richest.
It takes a long time for loose 'coalition' of tribal nations to become remotely democratic or free trade oriented, or a society as we know it. Effectively, in the process of dismantling colonialism and it's structures, we caused most African countries (that we generally created) to go backwards.