Cricket World Cup: Umpire Simon Taufel says England incorrectly awarded run in final win over New Zealand
Ben Stokes apologises after ricochet for four more runs
The ICC has refused to be drawn into the furore surrounding the overthrows rule and whether England was incorrectly awarded an extra run in the World Cup final.
Key points:
- England was awarded six runs for an overthrow when the ball hit Ben Stokes's bat and went to the boundary
- England finished the game with the same number of runs as New Zealand
- England won the World Cup after a tied super over
In a match shrouded in drama, England scored six from the third-last ball, when a throw from Martin Guptill rebounded off a diving Ben Stokes's bat to the boundary.
It helped England tie the match, before a super over was also tied and it was handed the trophy over New Zealand on a boundary countback.
The umpires, Sri Lankan Kumar Dharmasena and Marais Erasmus from South Africa, awarded six as Stokes and Adil Rashid were returning for their second run when the overthrow was made.
However, it has since emerged that under Law 19.8, extra runs are only awarded if the batsmen have crossed when the ball is thrown, which was not the case on Sunday.
ICC Rule 19.8: Overthrow or wilful act of fielder
If the boundary results from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be:
- any runs for penalties awarded to either side
- and the allowance for the boundary
- and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act.
It means that England should only have received five runs off the delivery, leaving it with four to win off two balls.
Crucially, it also would have seen number 10 Rashid on strike for the next ball, rather than the in-form Stokes.
More Here
#kiwiswererippedoff