Thread: Muslims don't decry extremism? Yet another prominent one

Originally Posted by Ronin

There's no need to read it in Arabic, it's available in English.

Get back under your rock.[/quote]

Spat the dummy and lost yer rattle! Never mind.

Originally Posted by ENT

That's rich coming from a Freemason!

No shit?

Why would it be "rich" coming from a Freemason?

Because Masons hide in their basements, cooking up their weird little schemes.

Basements?

Is that what the big bad wolf told you?

No, allah did.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Why would it be "rich" coming from a Freemason?

I'd guess he means it's hypocritical.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly94

There are over 109 suras in the book of hate calling for violence,

There are only 114 surahs in the Quran. I've just read 10 of them that prove your claim is rubbish.

Originally Posted by Dapper

Originally Posted by Neverna

Why would it be "rich" coming from a Freemason?

I'd guess he means it's hypocritical.

Right. So because ENT somehow believes Freemasons "hide in their basements, cooking up their weird little scheme", it was, according to ENT's "logic", hypocritical of Sabang to even mention basements. Bizarre. But given what else ENT has posted, I'm not surprised. He really should get out more.

Originally Posted by ENT

Islam has been an aggressive religion from the start, moderation isn't part of the creed.

It has some stiff competition from Christianity. Look at the command to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide from 1 Samuel (15:3).

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

^^I think I missed the first part mate - apologies.

^ No need to apologise. I think you were right. He cleared it up in reply 79.

And the rest? You've proven nothing.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by ENT

Islam has been an aggressive religion from the start, moderation isn't part of the creed.

It has some stiff competition from Christianity. Look at the command to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide from 1 Samuel (15:3).

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

What are you on about? You grab some OTestament historical Judaic jingoism and try to cobble that onto latter-day Xtian doctrine, never mind that it doesn't fit, neither in place nor time.

JC's message in the N Testament is a new edict overriding the old.

But of course, Xtian fundamentalists can't understand that, neither can you, as you don't read the bible as it was meant to be read through pesharim, something you and other fundamentalists refuse to acknowledge.

Originally Posted by ENT

What are you on about? You grab some OTestament historical Judaic jingoism and try to cobble that onto latter-day Xtian doctrine, never mind that it doesn't fit, neither in place nor time.

JC's message in the N Testament is a new edict overriding the old.

But of course, Xtian fundamentalists can't understand that, neither can you, as you don't read the bible as it was meant to be read through pesharim, something you and other fundamentalists refuse to acknowledge.

Xtian fundamentalists? No such thing, mate. Ask ENT. You can't pick and choose about how much of a Xtian you want to be. It's all or nothing.

(I thought you'd have known that. )

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by Dapper

Originally Posted by Neverna

Why would it be "rich" coming from a Freemason?

I'd guess he means it's hypocritical.

Right. So because ENT somehow believes Freemasons "hide in their basements, cooking up their weird little scheme", it was, according to ENT's "logic", hypocritical of Sabang to even mention basements. Bizarre. But given what else ENT has posted, I'm not surprised. He really should get out more.

Says the Muslim apologist hiding behind the confusion and contradictions of Islam.

Now where did I label Sabang a hypocrite? You're just trying to stir up trouble again.
You overlook the fact that it was anti-Semitic Sabang mouthing off about basements.

Now come up with some sense instead of childish dribble.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by ENT

Islam has been an aggressive religion from the start, moderation isn't part of the creed.

It has some stiff competition from Christianity. Look at the command to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide from 1 Samuel (15:3).

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

...or most of the book of Deuteronomy amongst hundreds of other nasty biblical references - it's rife.

Religion of peace and harmony.

Originally Posted by Neverna

Xtian fundamentalists? No such thing, mate. Ask ENT. You can't pick and choose about how much of a Xtian you want to be. It's all or nothing. (I thought you'd have known that.)

Typical Muslim distortions and lies.

Plenty of Xtian fundamentalists and blasphemers, chappy, go ask Quimcornholer.

But there's no moderate Islam, it's a myth.

So it was a bit rich of an alleged Freemason to mention basements? Freemasons aren't allowed to mention basements? Is it banned in freemasonry? Do you think it's hypocritical of Freemason to mention basements? Or just Sabang?

Originally Posted by ENT

You grab some OTestament historical Judaic jingoism

As opposed to grabbing some old Koranic jingoism?

Originally Posted by ENT

C's message in the N Testament is a new edict overriding the old.

If you find a jewish person to agree with that, congrats- you've found one of the 1% or so of messianic Jews.

It's all claptrap to me, frankly. Bible types need argue with each other.

Originally Posted by ENT

Now where did I label Sabang a hypocrite? You're just trying to stir up trouble again. You overlook the fact that it was anti-Semitic Sabang mouthing off about basements.

Oh, so you label me an antisemite? I think you're the hypocrite.

Bilderberger Group.

Originally Posted by thaimeme

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by ENT

Islam has been an aggressive religion from the start, moderation isn't part of the creed.

It has some stiff competition from Christianity. Look at the command to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide from 1 Samuel (15:3).

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

...or most of the book of Deuteronomy amongst hundreds of other nasty biblical references - it's rife.

Religion of peace and harmony.

Except that's all superseded by the teachings of Christ (hint: Christianity) and the New Testament.

Originally Posted by thaimeme

Originally Posted by Neverna

Originally Posted by ENT

Islam has been an aggressive religion from the start, moderation isn't part of the creed.

It has some stiff competition from Christianity. Look at the command to carry out ethnic cleansing or genocide from 1 Samuel (15:3).

Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

...or most of the book of Deuteronomy amongst hundreds of other nasty biblical references - it's rife.

Religion of peace and harmony.

Your daddy must have been a Xtian fundamentalist, too, for you to have grown so bitter and twisted about the west.

You forget JC's new commandment over-riding the old.

The New Testament was labelled such because it was regarded as a new story, a new explanation of a god, and a new interpretation of then mainstream Jewish laws.

It was a path away from the violent political edicts of Old Testament writings,

Again, none of it can be much understood without using pesharim to understand when and where meanings change in the writings.

But of course you and others like you don't want to know about that, it suits your agenda to keep cherry-picking out of context quotes from a bible that not even scholars can agree upon, then think you're some clever chap because you think you've made some funny joke or salient point about whatever it is you're trying to prove.

Fail.

Start with understanding that the Bible both OT and NT are beyond the understanding of the hoi polloi. ca NOT be cherry-picked to prove anything whatsoever, other than that you're a fool to do so.

Originally Posted by stroller

Originally Posted by thaimeme

...or most of the book of Deuteronomy amongst hundreds of other nasty biblical references - it's rife.

Religion of peace and harmony.

Except that's all superseded by the teachings of Christ (hint: Christianity) and the New Testament.

Precisely.

But you're gonna have to be patient while the fools catch up when the penny drops.