As declared by the RTP?
UK Met officers that observed:
Their are confusion and inconsistencies in the investigation, and questions about the strength of the case against the accused.
I'm not sure you actually know much about the RTP.
Not sure how you connect not having info about the crime, and being victims of influential people unknown to them, as one and the same.But they saud “We are victims of influential people,”“Did you kill them or didn’t you kill them?” the judge asked at one point, according to Mr Hall.
“No, we didn’t,” the men replied.
The judge then urged the two men to reveal any information they had about the murders, Mr Hall added. “You don’t need to be scared. If you know who did it, tell us.”
The men replied that they had been drunk and did not have any information about the crimes.
and now they have no info...
I would say that the original police chief going after local leaders and their son, publicly declaring there's evidence against them, then being replaced immediately as head of the investigation and that avenue closed down would be far more suspicious.
The investigation being reported as being conducted with 'confusion and inconsistencies' and their being 'questions about the strength of the case' against the B2 by the observing UK Met officers says a lot really.
You would think that with such strong evidence as genuine DNA on the victims that the case couldn't possibly have questions about the strength of the case, wouldn't you?
But perhaps you haven't been in Thailand all that long to understand how the country works. Or you're just trolling.