Quote Originally Posted by Troy View Post
Quote Originally Posted by patsycat
So, how did their sperm get on Hannah's body?
If it had, I imagine the RTP case would have been accepted by the courts. The suspicion is that the only DNA related to these two is from a discarded cigarette butt found on the same beach. They just happened to be in the area at roughly the same time.

A report posted on this thread earlier showed DNA samples B & C, suggesting that there was a sample A on a previous page of the report. That may just have been DNA from one of the victims and purposely left out of the posted report in order to imply a third attacker or needs removing from the prosecution evidence. In fact all of this DNA evidence (regarding the victims) may require removal from prosecution evidence to justify charging these two kids and ensuring the defence do not have legal access to it.

Always so much harder to get lies through courts than justice....
If that's the report in Thai I posted please disregard, it was just an example of an autopsy report that I copied from DSI thinking it was the report. I did state this error a few pages ago, Apologies again.