Quote Originally Posted by chassamui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by longway
Knob's sentence doesn't even make any sense, but that would be about par for the course from a narcissistic buffoon with his head up his ass.

The question is not about climate change, but whether the projections of catastrophic climate change are valid or not. It is portrayed that the consensus on the projections of catastrophic climate change among the scientific community researching this topic is 97%. This is simply not true, and is propaganda.
It makes perfect sense, unless you are funded by big oil and gas. If that were the case you would be able to produce plausible statistical analysis in support of your rather wild claims.
As you are unable to do so, it just means you are a rather pathetic mumbling dick.
What are the wild claims I have made?

The only thing I have pointed out is that the 97% consensus claim is propaganda, as the vast majority of papers used, over 99% or them, do not support the hypothesis of man made catastrophic climate change.

I don't know what its like in your world as i dont have my head up my ass, but its not me who is making the wild claims.

Up to this point I am the only one who directly addressed what was put to me, I checked it out and found out it was bs. I posted the link, none of you have even attempted to address the point I raised.

So obviously it must be you and your silly little mates who are the mumbling dicks.