Quote Originally Posted by chassamui View Post
Quote Originally Posted by longway
Knob's sentence doesn't even make any sense, but that would be about par for the course from a narcissistic buffoon with his head up his ass.

The question is not about climate change, but whether the projections of catastrophic climate change are valid or not. It is portrayed that the consensus on the projections of catastrophic climate change among the scientific community researching this topic is 97%. This is simply not true, and is propaganda.
It makes perfect sense, unless you are funded by big oil and gas. If that were the case you would be able to produce plausible statistical analysis in support of your rather wild claims.
As you are unable to do so, it just means you are a rather pathetic mumbling dick.
I thought that was a given.