
Originally Posted by
RPETER65

Originally Posted by
AntRobertson
It has nothing to do with Dyson. Which is precisely why I asked you the question, not Dyson.
Besides Dyson's easy to discredit: he's not a climatologist, I've worked on cars before, that doesn't make me a mechanic, and the GWPF is just yet another corporate mouthpiece.
And why would you ask me that question when the answer has already been established?
Because I wasn't aware that the answer had already been established. And I asked the question because it has relevance.
If, as I assume, you're one of those that believe the earth is circa. 4 - 10,000 years old that is a notion that is completely contrary to scientific understanding. And since you clearly don't believe in climate change I therefore find it interesting that you obviously pick and choose what parts of science you
do believe - e.g. the Dyson article - in order to fit the answers to your preconceptions.

Originally Posted by
RPETER65
Dyson may not be a climatologist but he has worked on climate computer models which is what he is referring to.
Goodo. And like I say I've worked on cars but that doesn't make me a mechanic.