Quote Originally Posted by blue
Trolling eh ?
It's the so called facts that you and Boon repeatedly post up here as if they are damning evidence against global warming when they in fact support it.

The real argument you should be using isn't erratic weather.
That the planet is warming is not in any dispute whatsoever.
That the climate is changing is also in no dispute whatsoever.
What is in question is whether the warming is anthropogenic in origin due to the carbon and pollutants we humans have put into the atmosphere. There have been very few posts on this thread that even try to point the smoking gun of evidential data away from anthropogenic warming. What you do post up repeatedly is the same tired denialist crap that has been and can be easily disproved against the mounting evidence. It's the Sun, it's a natural cycle of the Earth etc etc., but you present no evidence to back up your claims except links to websites funded by the oil lobby that are spinning propaganda to make it seem like there is doubt in scientific circles, well, apart from the normal healthy doubt of the peer review system.
There have been some very interesting papers over recent years that have once tested been included into climate change science. The effects of the Sun on atmospheric chemistry, on cloud formation, how solar flares influence weather. Often these papers are presented as evidence that the science is not settled, which of course science never is, but these new papers and knowledge are reviewed and then incorporated into climate theory, and it still indicates that we are the source and that within 100 years we will see massive shifts in climate around the globe.

Lift your game is all I'm saying. It gets boring refuting the same points over and over again and as others have posted it does you both a disservice.