Boonme you have excelled yourself, posting from the blog of a koch brothers lawyer, an american lawyer. Now I was under the impression that american lawyers had a reputation for being complete whores who would do anything for money, for whom the truth was whatever the client wanted to be.
But obviously they become paragons of truth and reliability when they say what boonmee wants to hear.

And a russian state new agency, please

Boonmee just because someone tells you what you want to hear does not automatically make it true, thats why you made a complete prat of yourself over the last american election causing you so much embarrassment that you had to leave the board for 2 months to give you time to forget what an utter fool you made of yourself. And its not like that was the first or last time, you have gone into self imposed exile from the board under similar circumstances. Are you a fish or something because one of the things that separates humans from fish is a permanent memory that helps us learn from experience and stop making complete and utter fools of ourselves.

psdo the models are crap because the data going into them is crap. Well we have been though this one quite a few times on this thread, classic denialist rinse and repeat.

You see there was a time when you could have raised these concerns about the quaility of data in the models and the transparency of the process by which the models were created, for that matter. All of these issues were delt with in the creation of the BEST climate model; the one that was funded, and constcted by clement skeptics and supported by almost all until it came back with the same answer as the existing models.

By ignoring the results of the BEST model and continuing to rinse and repeat the claims that its disproved you are simply demonstrating that you were and have never been a clement sceptic but a full blown denailist for whom the only evidence that counts is that agrees which what you want to hear; a rather religious perspective on science that simply does not work.

And yes psdo there si some truth to following the money and again if you were interested anything beyond wishful thinking you might have noticed that the fossil fuel industry is quite a few orders of magnitude larger than carbon trading, and if you look at those telling you the stories you want to hear, you will find companies, trusts, individuals engaging in a carbon copy campaign of propaganda for their own vested interests just as they did with DDT, Asbestos, tobacco and american public policy. But then they are telling you want you want to hear... so that makes them reliable this time.
And this is where the differences are between us, I and several others have posted evidence showing the financial and political links between those who have a vested financial interest in opposing action against climate change and the echo chamber that they finance.... all you have provided for your claims is empty rhetoric.