Quote Originally Posted by MrG View Post
Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
Quote Originally Posted by MrG View Post
Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
Where about in there does it say the correct temperature for the world? Any where?
I refer you to posts 644 and 646 in this thread.
I don't think you've responded to either of them except to ask again:

Quote Originally Posted by pseudolus View Post
Where about in there does it say the correct temperature for the world? Any where?
There are a few glaring problems with both of those posts though which can be neatly summed up as

"This information has been made up to support MMGW".

The first one is all about computer models over a very selected time - all a load of bull. The second one says that there s an optimal temp for humans and gives a range which does not follow when you compare if to the life expectancy rates. It is also clearly made up as well.

So, sorry to not agree with you, and I appreciate that you feel empowered because Al Criminal Gore is on your side, but no one has answered my question because there is no right answer. There is an assumption being made that raising in temp is bad and yet the Vikings growing veg in snow covered Greenland might have disagreed with you.

You want to be more concerned with big yank firms spewing guff like "human beings have no RIGHT to water". Crops will always grow (a lot quicker in warmer climate where they can grow 3-4 crops a year instead of 1) but they will not some firm controls the water and unless you pay over the odds for the poison coated seeds from Monsanto, you won't have anything to grow either.

But worry not - we will soon be watching the rich people get richer trading credits and all the cost being passed to the consumers. Well done for helping them. You are doing a good job.

So your whole argument amounts to being like your name, Psuedo. You dispute those posts because the data is:
...made up to support MMGW.
...all a load of bull.
...an optimal temp for humans and gives a range which does not follow when you compare if to the life expectancy rates (What...?)
...Al Criminal Gore is on your side
...Vikings growing veg in snow covered Greenland might have disagreed with you.

All wrapped up with:
...we will soon be watching the rich people get richer trading credits and all the cost being passed to the consumers. Well done for helping them.

OK....
So, I guess we agree to disagree, Psuedo.
I won't disturb you about it further.
Models by there very nature rely on the information that is put in. Crap in....gore models out. Simple.

why is it so hard for people to not see how much money the climate change (nee global warming) crowd are making from all of this?