Thread: Evolution vs Bible

Originally Posted by kerux

Answer the question stocking

Stocking, how infantile! Why not something a little more original like Oxo or Cubes?

To understand biogeographics you need to understand Plate Tectonics.

Why do you guys keep responding to this prat?

Originally Posted by Sir Burr

Why do you guys keep responding to this prat?

It's like a scab you can't help but pick it.
OK I will try to leave my scabs alone Sir.

Originally Posted by kerux

If the Flood was 'local' then God is a liar because He promised to never flood the earth again.

Ge 9:15

I will remember my covenant between me and you and all living creatures of every kind.

Never again will the waters become a flood to destroy all life.

All life, not just local life.

13 I have set my rainbow in the clouds, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth.

In that case, please explain why He used the words 'never again'? Doesn't that indicate that He had done so once before, that is, create a flood to destroy ALL life, in which case how was life was restored?

You can't have it both ways.

I stand corrected, you obviously can!

Originally Posted by Stocky

Originally Posted by kerux

Answer the question stocking

Stocking, how infantile! Why not something a little more original like Oxo or Cubes?

To understand biogeographics you need to understand Plate Tectonics.

In debating, the above is an example of a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with answering the question put to you three know nothings:

to wit:

Answer the question stocking, kingwithlittewilly and now whiteshiva:

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii?

This question stopped all you mothers cold didn't it?

All three of you mockers were posting at the time this question was posed, around 1:50 pm. All three.

Then, oops! Nothing.

Doesn't your hindu god have the answers?

Originally Posted by kerux

Although we know there was a massive flood in the region at around the time the OT Flood narrative is supposed to have occurred,

At least you admit there was a "massive flood in the region."

Keep going, you're on the right track.

I don't 'admit' anything...it's just your fine choice of words.

Please direct my attentioun to wherever it was that I originally denied the event, or grow up and stop being so fecking obtuse.

Doesn't that indicate that He had done so once before, that is, create a flood to destroy ALL life, in which case how was life was restored?

No, it doesn't. It means what it says: That God would never again destroy the entire earth with a flood.

You just revealed how critical thinking challeged you are.

Originally Posted by Little Chuchok

Did noah have special little glass cages for all the insects?

Where in the bible does it say they had glass? Go on, prove it!

Originally Posted by keda

Originally Posted by kerux

Although we know there was a massive flood in the region at around the time the OT Flood narrative is supposed to have occurred,

At least you admit there was a "massive flood in the region."

Keep going, you're on the right track.

I don't 'admit' anything...it's just your fine choice of words.

Please direct my attentioun to wherever it was that I originally denied the event, or grow up and stop being so fecking obtuse.

"....Although we know.... "

Knowing that there was a massive flood in the [Mesopatamia] region during the time of the flood isn't admitting there was a massive flood in the Mesopatamia region at the time of the flood?




And I'm obtuse?

And I need to grow up?

Originally Posted by kerux

Doesn't that indicate that He had done so once before, that is, create a flood to destroy ALL life, in which case how was life was restored?

No, it doesn't. It means what it says: That God would never again destroy the entire earth with a flood.

You just revealed how critical thinking challeged you are.

I suggest you read your own post, this time a bit slower.

Originally Posted by kerux

Originally Posted by keda

Originally Posted by kerux

Although we know there was a massive flood in the region at around the time the OT Flood narrative is supposed to have occurred,

At least you admit there was a "massive flood in the region."

Keep going, you're on the right track.

I don't 'admit' anything...it's just your fine choice of words.

Please direct my attentioun to wherever it was that I originally denied the event, or grow up and stop being so fecking obtuse.

"....Although we know.... "

Knowing that there was a massive flood in the [Mesopatamia] region during the time of the flood isn't admitting there was a massive flood in the Mesopatamia region at the time of the flood?




And I'm obtuse?

And I need to grow up?

Not at all. How far distant is knowing something from admitting it (i.e. making a concession)? Think it through for yourself, but again, try a bit slower this time.

Originally Posted by kerux

Stocking, how infantile! Why not something a little more original like Oxo or Cubes? To understand biogeographics you need to understand Plate Tectonics.

In debating, the above is an example of a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with answering the question put to you three know nothings: to wit: Answer the question stocking, kingwithlittewilly and now whiteshiva:[/QUOTE]

Kerux so glad you remembered that question, it was posed at you to explain how the fruit they got from there and back in your noahs ark myth. As I remember you kept distinctly silent with regards to a fucking answer so why should anyone answer you here?

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

oh sorry - where you calling me?? didnt hear you, try shouting louder next time!

BTW - there is no such thing as an evolutionist ! Evolution is NOT a theory as you guys would have people believe, scientisits are not torn into different groups over the concept.

Answer the question stocking, kingwithlittewilly and now whiteshiva:

you three know nothings:

oh how mature, you've wounded me badly - coming from someone moaning about how he had to endure personal attacks and so forth.

BTW - hate to ruin you little willy joke, but um, that's actually my name.

[quote]

To understand biogeographics you need to understand Plate Tectonics.

Originally Posted by K

In debating, the above is an example of a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with answering the question put to

yeah - it does - you asked about how animals are there, for you to understand the concepts invovled in the explanation. Same as person cannot understand Calculus before they understand Algebra.

This question stopped all you mothers cold didn't it?

All three of you mockers were posting at the time this question was posed, around 1:50 pm. All three.

yeah - oops sorry - i had a meeting. dont know about the others but i guess they got lives also.

unfortunately i cannot keep up with your pace of 79.84 posts per day (nor do i care to)

hang on a second, I recall somebody saying in response to a question about a period of silence, somewhat testily, I dont have to hand around here all day just for you....

was that you MrK ?? it was - and no i'm not going to prove it cos reading your 432 volumious posts was entertaining enough the first time....

and I think this is the first question you've asked me that I either havent bothered to answer or (more to the point) didnt have time to answer...

how many of mine have you ignored or wriggled around (which for the most part have been completely civil the entire time ) ???

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

IF God or whoever created man in his own image, then we're ALL GODS, Damn, that's a concept.

Where is this statue?

Originally Posted by kingwillyhggtb

Originally Posted by kerux

For many reasons I may go into later, I believe there was a canopy surrounding the earth at the time of the flood

SWEET MARY AND JOSEPH! you crack me up - I'm glad i didnt out you on ignore. Its just too funny!

1. What is the volume of water required to completely cover the entire planet ? you need to explain where 8km's additional volume come from ??

This was all in sky ???? [Never said that :Bsflag should go here].

Water above Mountains?

Is there enough water to cover all the earth’s preflood mountains in a global flood? Most people do not realize that the volume of water on earth is ten times greater than the volume of all land above sea level.


Most of the earth’s mountains consist of tipped and buckled sedimentary layers. Because these sediments were initially laid down through water as nearly horizontal layers, those mountains must have been pushed up after the sediments were deposited. [See pages 102–130.]



If the effects of compressing the continents and buckling up mountains were reversed, the oceans would again flood the entire earth. Therefore, the earth has enough water to cover the smaller mountains that existed before the flood. (If the solid earth were perfectly smooth, the water depth would be about 9,000 feet everywhere.)

In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - 128.   Water above Mountains?

yeah - oops sorry - i had a meeting. dont know about the others but i guess they got lives also.

It looks as thought you're out of your 'meeting' now so:

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

how many of mine have you ignored or wriggled around

None that I know of, but if there is one, I'll be glad to answer it after you

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

unfortunately i cannot keep up with your pace of 79.84 posts per day ......cos reading your 432 volumious posts was entertaining enough the first time....

Most of my posts have been made cleaning up your

and asking you to

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

Mr.K, what's with the big writing? You short-sighted? I'm not...

and asking you to

from an evolutionist point of view, please explain how the animals got to places like NZ and Hawaii.

mind if i quote you??

Originally Posted by kerux

If I have time to explain why I think it's BS I do. If not, I don't. So much BS being spewed forth, hard to clean up every single dung dropping.

Simple as that.