^
Caveat emptor.
In other words, Tham Jai Khun![]()
^
Caveat emptor.
In other words, Tham Jai Khun![]()
^ Come on Edison, tell us how to judge when the gauge wire is correct on the string of Christmas lights everyone hangs on their kids Christmas tree.
Guess you want to go back to eating lead paint chips like in the good old days.
How many dodgy electrical products have you bought here in Thailand?
Tell the truth. You can't tell shit by the package.
Just a lame headline thought up by a whining right-wing-nut that hates anything gubment.
^ Have you gotten hold of Jeff's random word generator?
It's come to this:
Boy Scouts Ban Water-Gun Fights Because Squirt Guns Are ‘Simulated Firearms’
Pointing any type of firearm or simulated firearm at any individual is unauthorized,” states the group’s 2015 manual. “Water guns and rubber band guns must only be used to shoot at targets, and eye protection must be worn,” it continues. As for those other dangerous weapons, water balloons, they may be “no larger than a ping-pong ball” and must be biodegradable. Sound like a bit much? Well, according to Bryan Wendell, authort of the blog Bryan on Scouting, there’s a actually perfectly logical explanation:
“A Scouter once told me this explanation I liked quite a bit: ‘A Scout is kind. What part of pointing a firearm [simulated or otherwise] at someone is kind?” True point,” he writes. After all — it’s not like water guns are totally banned! You still can use them to shoot at targets! I mean, as long as you wear protective eyewear! Oh, and by the way — the targets are also not allowed to look like humans either. Just to be, you know, extra safe or something."
Boy Scouts Ban Water-Gun Fights Because Squirt Guns Are ?Simulated Firearms? | National Review Online
It's totally out of control...![]()
A Deplorable Bitter Clinger
They're popping out of the woodwork like crazy!
NJ 5TH GRADER SUSPENDED FOR HAVING NERF GUN ‘BULLET’ IN HIS POCKET
On May 8, Atlantic City, New Jersey, 5th grader Aarin Moody reached into his pocket to retrieve a “late note” from his mother and a Nerf gun foam “bullet” fell out. Officials at the Atlantic City School District categorized the toy bullet as a “self-constructed weapon” because “it had a toothpick stuck in it.”
As a result, Moody received “a five-day, in-school suspension and a notation on his permanent record stating that he brought a makeshift weapon to school.”
NJ 5th Grader Suspended for Having Nerf Gun 'Bullet' in His Pocket - Breitbart
What has the Nanny State done for you lately?![]()
Who on earth in their right minds would blame them? Someone has to protect these kids from the police.
In November, Tamir Rice was shot near his home two seconds after police exited their vehicle to confront the pre-teen, who was holding a toy gun.
The Cleveland police officer who shot a 12-year-old boy 6 months ago reportedly still hasn't been questioned | Business Insider India
"According to Fox News, the 5th grader put toothpicks in the Nerf bullets “so they would stick to the ground when he fired them from his Nerf gun.” Moody said he did not put the toothpicks in to cause mischief."
He deserves the suspension for being a lying little shit (most probable) or a gormless twat (possible).
Next up for you big government lovers!
S'mores no more? Feds wage war of culinary aggression
The USDA wants Americans to remove chocolate and marshmallows and fire from our summertime s’mores. Instead - the USDA is suggesting we load up the graham crackers with strawberries and low-fat yogurt.
That's not a s'more. That's a fruit salad with an oversized graham cracker crouton.
Over the past six years the Obama administration has waged a War of Culinary Aggression against lard-loving Americans.
What kind of dystopian society have we become where a red blooded American cannot enjoy a graham cracker smothered in milk chocolate and topped with a slightly charred marshmallow?"
S'mores no more? Feds wage war of culinary aggression | Fox News
It's outa control boys...![]()

They've been doing that for decades . . . I'm surprised you didn't know thatOriginally Posted by Boon Mee
This nanny state buzzword is all the latest rage. Is there a specific point at which a state moves into the nanny zone or is nannyism in the eye of the beholder.
Is it nanny to:
Impose traffic speed limits?
Require businesses to be licensed?
Allow minorities equal rights?
Impose food quality standards?
Impose building standards?
And on, and on.
Just asking. Enquiring minds want to know.
![]()
Ever seen that show "man versus food". While most of the massive servings of heart attack he eats look disgustingly delicious, food will win in the end.
I see why the government is doing this though.
If they're going to introduce universal healthcare a healthy population will save them a lot.
If your average Yank knows he has healthcare regardless i think they'll eat whatever they want.
“If we stop testing right now we’d have very few cases, if any.” Donald J Trump.
Why not? They tell us what we can and not smoke.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
![]()

You still don't get it?Originally Posted by Boon Mee
YOUR government has been dictating what you can and cannot eat for decades . . .
But then I guess prohibiting dangerous chemicals to be used as flavour enhancers is a bit nanny-state-ish . . . same goes for using deadly pesticides to grow food . . .
Yup, ISIS-like people . . . Reagan, Bush Snr etc . . .Originally Posted by Boon Mee
Is eating babies still illegal in the USA? It is!!! Nanny-State fascists!!!!!!!! Eating babies is what made the US great.Originally Posted by Boon Mee
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)