Thread: Right-wing domestic terrorists

pretty small stash for somebody wanting to kill everybody in the world

^Potential or hypothetical^

vs.

Actual, happily deceased, terrorist who tried but failed to kill anyone. (liberal dipshit doesn't know his way around a gun)


James Hodgkinson

James has been described by his former lawyer as an irascible angry little man. Suzanne Hodgkinson, was his wife and lived with her at their home in Belleville, Illinois. The Hodgkinsons raised several foster children including one, Wanda Ashley Stock, who killed herself in 1996 at the age of 17 by dousing herself with gasoline and setting herself on fire after just several months with the Hodgkinsons.

psycho nutjob!

In court documents, prosecutors say Hasson identified himself as a white nationalist who has advocated for “focused violence” to create a “white homeland.” He was researching the manifesto of far-right Norwegian mass murder Anders Breivik and prosecutors believe he was stockpiling weapons and supplies as Breivik instructed in his writings.

(he) had compiled a hit list of targets that included several top Democratic politicians and well-known members of the mainstream media.

politicians the right wing terrorist planned to murder

sen. warren (D)
sen. harris (D)
sen. booker (D)
sen. blumenthal (D)
sen. schumer (D)
sen. gillibrand (D)
sen. kaine (D)
speaker pelosi (D)
rep. o'rouke (D)
rep. omar (D)
rep. ocasio cortez (D)
rep. waters (D)

members of media the right wing terrorist planned to murder
ari melber
don lemon
joe scarborough
chris cuomo
chris hayes
van jones

others the right wing terrorist planned to murder
john podesta
angela davis

In recent weeks, Hasson had also been searching for terms related to those on his list, according to prosecutors. He searched for “what if Trump illegally impeached,” “best place in DC to see congress people,” “where in dc to [sic] congress live,” “civil war if trump impeached,” and “social democrats usa.” Hasson had also searched for “most liberal senators,” “do senators have [secret service] protection,” according to court documents.

https://heavy.com/news/2019/02/chris...mocrats-media/

Oh look, texprat has found a token liberal crazy to go with all the trumpanzee crazies on the 32-page "right wing domestic terrorist" thread.

Well done texprat, I see all that time in TD nick has widened your horizons.

You're peddling theoretical, BarelyHairy, my example is actual. Lunatic liberals with BLM and the crazy-bitch feminist corps are into violence every day. It defines them. One dude with a bunch of guns and people he doesn't care for does not make a crime. Keep swinging.

Originally Posted by Texpat

You're peddling theoretical, BarelyHairy, my example is actual. Lunatic liberals with BLM and the crazy-bitch feminist corps are into violence every day. It defines them. One dude with a bunch of guns and people he doesn't care for does not make a crime. Keep swinging.

You're missing the point as ever.

The vast majority of US domestic terrorists are knuckle-dragging white racists, ones that make up a large constituency of "trumpanzees".

The fact that you can find one left wing looney has absolutely no bearing on that simple fact.

No idea how domestic terrorism is defined in the US - been sitting on your sofa in Nong Kai with a crate of beer for too long, Tex.

Originally Posted by stroller

No idea how domestic terrorism is defined in the US - been sitting on your sofa in Nong Kai with a crate of beer for too long, Tex.

In a pool of his own piss. I think the fumes have got to him.

Originally Posted by raycarey

angela davis

A blast from the past. Remember her well.
Angela Davis 'stunned' by decision to rescind civil rights award.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...l-rights-award

not a word from trump or the DOJ about this high profile case of right wing domestic terrorism.

Normally, when an alleged terrorist plot is uncovered in the U.S., the Justice Department issues a press release to let the public know about their successful investigation — even in cases that at first glance appear to be much less serious than an extremist who had already put together their own hit list and weapons cache. In this case, however, there was no such release.


Instead, the news broke to the public through the Twitter feed of Seamus Hughes, a deputy director of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University, a D.C.-based counterterrorism think tank. Hughes shared the documents with the allegations against Hasson, which had apparently been posted to the court’s online docket. Without the sort of press release that tends to accompany major terrorism arrests, Hughes found Hassan’s case because he habitually checks court filings.


The administration’s silence fits a pattern. A study published last year by the Washington-based Institute for Social Policy and Understanding showed that the Justice Department was six times more likely to issue press releases in alleged plots that involved Muslims than non-Muslims.

https://theintercept.com/2019/02/21/...topher-hasson/



this guy planned to kill the third in the line of succession for the highest office in the land....the senate minority leader....a handful of people running for president.

and nothing from trump.

not a press release....not a press conference...not a tweet.

and why not?

because christopher hasson is his base....just like 'the good people on both sides' in charlottesville.

Originally Posted by raycarey

not a word from trump or the DOJ about this high profile case of right wing domestic terrorism.

because christopher hasson is his base....just like 'the good people on both sides' in charlottesville.

And because he's another nutter who was able to assemble an arsenal of firearms.

Even the NYT reports that Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day said prosecutors are considering further charges beyond the relatively minor gun and drug possession counts he now faces.

Mountains and molehills. And that is why President Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America, hasn't commented. No threats, no intimidation, no crime -- like BLM, Occupy Wall Street, and the other libby loon groups regularly employ. Now go have a cool sarsaparilla and a lie down.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/u...st-attack.html

Originally Posted by Texpat

Even the NYT reports that Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day said prosecutors are considering further charges beyond the relatively minor gun and drug possession counts he now faces.

Mountains and molehills. And that is why President Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America, hasn't commented. No threats, no intimidation, no crime -- like BLM, Occupy Wall Street, and the other libby loon groups regularly employ. Now go have a cool sarsaparilla and a lie down.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/u...st-attack.html

Absolutely, he doesn't need jail, he needs a lengthy spell in a nuthouse.

Then again, so do you.

Originally Posted by uncle junior

pretty small stash for somebody wanting to kill everybody in the world

I would've thought that was a standard home defense portfolio for Americans or at the very least a standard american survivalist kit. (Refer Americans getting shot thread).

On Friday, the United States ended a 35-day government shutdown, the longest in history, over President Donald Trump’s demand for funding for a wall on the southern border. Hundreds of thousands of workers were missing paychecks; food-bank lines in Washington, D.C., were full of federal employees; and air-traffic controllers were warning of potential catastrophe.

The president’s strategy was predicated on the belief that the more suffering the shutdown inflicted on the American people, the more likely the Democrats were to cave to his demands. But it was all worth it, Trump insists, because the wall is necessary to stem the ceaseless tide of violence from the border. “The only thing that is immoral is the politicians to do nothing and continue to allow more innocent people to be so horribly victimized,” Trump said during his prime-time address in early January.

The president regularly invokes violent crises perpetrated by scary foreigners. The announcement of his candidacy began with the declaration that Mexican immigrants are “bringing drugs; they’re bringing crime; they’re rapists.” He called for a ban on Muslims coming to the United States after an ISIS-inspired attack in San Bernardino, California. In his border-wall address, he pointed to crimes committed by unauthorized immigrants, whose victims were bludgeoned to death, beheaded, or stabbed, to argue for the necessity of the wall. But there’s one spike in violence that the president rarely acknowledges or even mentions, and it’s the rise in far-right terror that has accompanied his ascension to the White House.

On Wednesday, the Anti-Defamation League released a report finding that attackers with ties to right-wing extremist movements killed at least 50 people in 2018. That was close to the total number of Americans killed by domestic extremists, meaning that the far right had an almost absolute monopoly on lethal terrorism in the United States last year. That monopoly would be total if, in one case, the perpetrator had not “switched from white supremacist to radical Islamist beliefs prior to committing the murder.”

The number of fatalities is 35 percent higher than the previous year, and it marks the fourth-deadliest year for such attacks since 1970. In fact, according to the ADL, white supremacists are responsible for the majority of such attacks “almost every year.” The 2018 attacks include the one at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life synagogue by a man who blamed Jews for the migrant caravan, the mass shooting at a yoga studio by an “incel” obsessed with interracial dating, and the school massacre in Parkland, Florida, carried out by a student who wished that “all the Jews were dead.”

From 2009 through 2018, right-wing extremists accounted for 73 percent of such killings, according to the ADL, compared with 23 percent for Islamists and 3 percent for left-wing extremists. In other words, most terrorist attacks in the United States, and most deaths from terrorist attacks, are caused by white extremists. But they do not cause the sort of nationwide panic that helped Trump win the 2016 election and helped the GOP expand its Senate majority in the midterms.

When white extremists kill, politicians do not demand that they be racially profiled. They do not call for bans on white people coming to the United States. They do not insist that white people’s freedom of movement be restricted, their houses of worship be surveilled, their leaders be banned from holding public office, or their neighborhoods be “secured” and occupied by armed agents of the state. And they do not demand that taxpayers foot the bill for a massive, symbolic monument that will register America’s official disdain for white people in perpetuity.

And that’s how it should be. It would be immoral to collectively punish white people for the actions of a few extremists—and it would only raise the stature of those extremists, partially legitimize their grievances in the eyes of potential followers, and strengthen their ability to recruit future operatives for further attacks. But that’s not the reason none of those things happen. They don’t happen because, as America’s largest demographic group, white people have the political power and influence to prevent such proposals from even being contemplated. This is a form of political correctness so powerful that it shapes behavior without being mentioned or publicly acknowledged; it is simply the way things work.

By contrast, when religious or ethnic minorities commit such acts, they are seen not as individual extremists, but as representative of the groups to which they belong. As such, collective punishment is believed to be justified. This is, in a basic sense, how American bigotry works: White Christians are simply individuals, while everyone else is vulnerable to demonization by demagogues prepared to exploit the fear of those who are different in exchange for political power.

The correct response to the rise in right-wing terrorism is not a nationwide panic that mirrors those that accompany terrorist attacks by religious or ethnic minorities. It is to extend the same benefit of the doubt, the same proportionate, measured response with which Americans meet attacks from right-wing extremists, to attacks of all sorts. It is to recognize that the constitutional rights of minorities are no less inviolable than the constitutional rights of white Americans, and that anyone who would run on a platform of disregarding those rights is not fit to hold public office.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...t-wing/581284/

There Have Been 334 Reported Hate Crimes Against Trump Supporters



https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...mp-supporters/

Put that in yer bong and hit it...

There have also been 334 snowflake Trumptards whining about getting back a dose of what they like to dish out.

Coincidence, I'm sure.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

snowflake Trumptards whining

here are but a few of the atrocities the delicate snowflakes were forced to endure....

January 25, 2016: NH: Trump Supporter’s Sign Vandalized
March 17, 2016: Trump campaign signs stolen from a Naples home
March 17, 2016: Woman records herself running over Trump signs in NC
March 21, 2016: Man’s homemade Trump billboard destroyed in Michigan.
June 23, 2016: Camera captures woman ripping Donald Trump flag off New Jersey porch
August 1, 2016: Kalamazoo man finds Trump campaign sign burned on lawn
August 5, 2016: Big Trump sign vandalized in Haverhill
September 25, 2016: Man urinates on Naples mailbox, steals Trump sign



and btw, while there were a few assaults included on the highly suspect list... notice the use of the word 'reported'.....not convicted (or even charged) with hate crimes....reported.


primarily just a bunch of MAGAt pussies

Invented the phrase "butthurt snowflakes".

Turned into butthurt snowflakes.

Jussie Smolett was attacked by a gang of right wing domestic terrorists!

Dumber than a stump.

Originally Posted by raycarey

here are but a few of the atrocities the delicate snowflakes were forced to endure....

January 25, 2016: NH: Trump Supporter’s Sign Vandalized
March 17, 2016: Trump campaign signs stolen from a Naples home
March 17, 2016: Woman records herself running over Trump signs in NC
March 21, 2016: Man’s homemade Trump billboard destroyed in Michigan.
June 23, 2016: Camera captures woman ripping Donald Trump flag off New Jersey porch
August 1, 2016: Kalamazoo man finds Trump campaign sign burned on lawn
August 5, 2016: Big Trump sign vandalized in Haverhill
September 25, 2016: Man urinates on Naples mailbox, steals Trump sign



and btw, while there were a few assaults included on the highly suspect list... notice the use of the word 'reported'.....not convicted (or even charged) with hate crimes....reported.


primarily just a bunch of MAGAt pussies

Jaysus... They really are a pack of precious little snowflakes aren't they!

No wonder they idolize an obese septuagenarian as a tough guy.

Originally Posted by AntRobertson

Jaysus... They really are a pack of precious little snowflakes aren't they!

No wonder they idolize an obese septuagenarian as a tough guy.

that's a MAGAt for you.

Originally Posted by bsnub

I can't wait until he starts posting articles that counter the point he is trying to make once you read them all the way through.

Starts? When did he stop?

If the right-wing racists on TD hold all 1.3 billion Muslims responsible for the actions of a few (and they do) then they must be held responsible for the actions of white supremacists like the shooter in Christchurch.

He is you. You own it.