Thread: President Donald Trump

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by longway

News flash
A libtard who gets everything wrong has a boggled mind.

You're in for a very rough 4 years if every negative post about Drumpf sets your hair on fire.

Every butthurt post about the Trumpenfuherer is a joy.

However, you get to wake up everyday knowing that he will be your president, its going to be a long eight years for you.

Originally Posted by Slick

Originally Posted by thailazer

It boggles the mind that people can't see the man for who he really is.

Its not like that.

Honestly, to see Trump for what he really is, and to understand why the dude is prez-elect, you have to understand how shit HRC was.

People focus on Trump and thats understandable. The fact of the matter is that the DNC and HRC seriously alienated the populace.

Just because Trump got the EC votes, does not mean that Murica' is a bunch of idiots.

The focus should not be on how Trump won, but what the Democrats did to lose.

Fair point, they were awful, and now they are blaming the russians.

I did point out that a number of times when it comes to the election, there is only a choice of 2, but the so-called experts on here could not understand that dynamic.

Originally Posted by longway

its going to be a long eight years for you.

Now that's just being mean...


That said, I do think Trump himself deserves a bit of credit; he picked a strong team, had a good strategy, and he owned the media with his outrageous tweeting and twaddle.

What nearly everyone failed to recognize (myself included) was how Trump truly understands how the media works. He deserves a fair bit of the credit.

It wasn't just about Hillary being an incredibly shit candidate who has almost single handedly destroyed the Democratic party. (Obama deserves some credit for that as well)

Eight years it is then.

Originally Posted by longway

I did point out that a number of times when it comes to the election, there is only a choice of 2, but the so-called experts on here could not understand that dynamic.

And this is honestly why Trump being President isn't going to be a big deal, relatively speaking. Clinton was the alternative and had absolutely zero justification for being president. Decades of running for President and I never once felt like she came close to answering the question: "Why are you worthy of being President"?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

they lost like they lost in 2004 against that dumb boy GW Bush, because they choose an overly ambitious shit candidate, last time it was Kerry, this time HRC

Agreed, and both times they had the chance to elect candidates that were far superior (Dean in '04, Sanders in '16). A lot of similarities in terms of the primary selection in those two cycles. Democrats beat themselves with absolute turds for candidates both times.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It wasn't just about Hillary being an incredibly shit candidate

No, it was.

^Attention WalMart shoppers! Earl is playing his old worn out Hair vinyl again.

Originally Posted by longway

Then along comes Trump...who has smashed it all up; revealing all.

Sanders in '16

Bernie had the right ideas, but you need heathen like trump to put those ideas into action. They would have eaten him alive in DC.

He is the first barbarian to build a wall, not knock one down.

And he is the very first president who isn't a bought and sold political hack or a military man!

Also Trump is a genuine leader of men and women.

Let's hope the CIA doesn't assassinate him!

He is up against some mighty powerful players in the military industrial, agriculture and big pharma world.

Perhaps they will continue to underestimate the Donald.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Just the fact that Trump is about to be inaugurated speaks volumes upon volumes!

...about the electorate and the electoral system.
Neither thing flattering.

How so? Because we are actually witnessing it work!

We are seeing how a candidate from outside of the usual corporate political big money pandering can be elected, and not mob rule from one single polulous liberal bastion state like California.

That's how it should work, all is not lost in America.

How so?
As far as the electorate goes, an electorate that chooses a man that is uncouth, not so bright (brighter than Bush Jr I'll concede), unscrupulous in business dealings, talks down to everyone, is arrogant, a philanderer, .....and on goes the unflattering list, speaks volumes of that electorate.
As far as the system (electoral college) goes, well, when a candidate that got the national popular vote loses, then how can it be called a democracy?

Originally Posted by Maanaam

How so?
As far as the electorate goes, an electorate that chooses a man that is uncouth, not so bright (brighter than Bush Jr I'll concede), unscrupulous in business dealings, talks down to everyone, is arrogant, a philanderer, .....and on goes the unflattering list, speaks volumes of that electorate.
As far as the system (electoral college) goes, well, when a candidate that got the national popular vote loses, then how can it be called a democracy?

You're simply parroting one sided lame-stream fake media, which was rendered irrelevant the moment Trump won.

For once in our lifetimes the voice of the people was heard.

It is indeed a historic event the lame media does not want you to acknowledge.

A president not owned by the big corporations, hard to imagine...but that's the way it is!

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

A president not owned by the big corporations, hard to imagine...but that's the way it is!

How do we know who he's indebted to? He refused to release his tax filings.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by Slick

Originally Posted by RPETER65

What exactly do you think working people deserve.

Everything fuckin easy apparently. $15/hour seems to be the arguing point but thats mind bogglingly stupid as wages across the board, top to bottom have to increase inline with the rise in minimum wage as well. People already making $15/hour have have their rate literally doubled or lose whatever ground they worked hard to gain.

You are right, how can the skilled $15 to $25 an hour workers stand for a non skilled,non edjucated,no experience worker making equal to them. This is the same mentality every body gets a trophy just for playing.

That is the entire point you trickle down lemmings. Raising the minimum wage is meant to dive wages up overall. It works. Putting money in the hands of working people drives the economy not tax cuts for the oligarchy.

Ok, so you say doubling the minimum wage will also drive up the upper wages(&7.50 to $15.00)which by all rights it should, and being fair that would put the $25.00 an hour wages at $50.00, now what effect do you think this will have on consumer pricing can we say, way up. So in essence what has been gained?
Maybe a better scenario would be to bring skilled jobs back, teach people they need a marketable skill and a decent work ethic to be economically successful,and do away with the illegal non skilled workers to give room for the young Americans to find jobs that can finance schooling to learn a skill.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Slick

Honestly, do you really think trump is just puling out his phone and tweeting some random shit? Like, middle of the night, all alone feelings as president elect?

YES. That is exactly what he is doing.


Read it and decide for yourself. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?...Ctwgr%5Eauthor

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by Slick

Honestly, do you really think trump is just puling out his phone and tweeting some random shit? Like, middle of the night, all alone feelings as president elect?

YES. That is exactly what he is doing.


Read it and decide for yourself. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?...Ctwgr%5Eauthor

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

It is pretty clear misskit is having many kittens today, on the eve of a great historical inauguration,


Meow, meow meow....

Originally Posted by Humbert

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

A president not owned by the big corporations, hard to imagine...but that's the way it is!

How do we know who he's indebted to? He refused to release his tax filings.

Don't forget! Trump has very small hands.

Originally Posted by redhaze

Originally Posted by longway

I did point out that a number of times when it comes to the election, there is only a choice of 2, but the so-called experts on here could not understand that dynamic.

And this is honestly why Trump being President isn't going to be a big deal, relatively speaking. Clinton was the alternative and had absolutely zero justification for being president. Decades of running for President and I never once felt like she came close to answering the question: "Why are you worthy of being President"?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

they lost like they lost in 2004 against that dumb boy GW Bush, because they choose an overly ambitious shit candidate, last time it was Kerry, this time HRC

Agreed, and both times they had the chance to elect candidates that were far superior (Dean in '04, Sanders in '16). A lot of similarities in terms of the primary selection in those two cycles. Democrats beat themselves with absolute turds for candidates both times.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It wasn't just about Hillary being an incredibly shit candidate

No, it was.

What does losing because Hillary was a shit candidate say about the current status of the Democratic Party, logically you must say shit.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

Just the fact that Trump is about to be inaugurated speaks volumes upon volumes!

...about the electorate and the electoral system.
Neither thing flattering.

How so? Because we are actually witnessing it work!

We are seeing how a candidate from outside of the usual corporate political big money pandering can be elected, and not mob rule from one single polulous liberal bastion state like California.

That's how it should work, all is not lost in America.

How so?
As far as the electorate goes, an electorate that chooses a man that is uncouth, not so bright (brighter than Bush Jr I'll concede), unscrupulous in business dealings, talks down to everyone, is arrogant, a philanderer, .....and on goes the unflattering list, speaks volumes of that electorate.
As far as the system (electoral college) goes, well, when a candidate that got the national popular vote loses, then how can it be called a democracy?

Did you mean to say Democratic Republic?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

Proves nothing except that anyone can keep up with his Twitter feed and see what he puts up there. Decide on their own if what he is doing is calculated or off the cuff.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It is pretty clear misskit is having many kittens today, on the eve of a great historical inauguration

The eve of this historical inauguration will be the 19th of this month. In spite of what you think, I am not very concerned about Trump's presidency.

What I am concerned about is the high tension between the USA and Russia.

We will know soon enough what is in the intelligence report and what Trump has to say about what he will be told tomorrow.

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by RPETER65

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

Proves nothing except that anyone can keep up with his Twitter feed and see what he puts up there. Decide on their own if what he is doing is calculated or off the cuff.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It is pretty clear misskit is having many kittens today, on the eve of a great historical inauguration

The eve of this historical inauguration will be the 19th of this month. In spite of what you think, I am not very concerned about Trump's presidency.

What I am concerned about is the high tension between the USA and Russia.

We will know soon enough what is in the intelligence report and what Trump has to say about what he will be told tomorrow.

The high tension between Russia and the USA is solely down to the USA who seem intent on war but thankfully Trump realises that really isn't such a good idea and would like to normalise relations with Russia to all our benefit.

Originally Posted by buriramboy

Originally Posted by misskit

Originally Posted by RPETER65

What exactly was posting that link supposed to prove?

Proves nothing except that anyone can keep up with his Twitter feed and see what he puts up there. Decide on their own if what he is doing is calculated or off the cuff.

Originally Posted by Mr Earl

It is pretty clear misskit is having many kittens today, on the eve of a great historical inauguration

The eve of this historical inauguration will be the 19th of this month. In spite of what you think, I am not very concerned about Trump's presidency.

What I am concerned about is the high tension between the USA and Russia.

We will know soon enough what is in the intelligence report and what Trump has to say about what he will be told tomorrow.

The high tension between Russia and the USA is solely down to the USA who seem intent on war but thankfully Trump realises that really isn't such a good idea and would like to normalise relations with Russia to all our benefit.

Indeed, Trump isn't dangerous. He'll maintain cordial businesslike relations with Russia.

The ones who are truly dangerous are the owners of the CIA (and the federal government as a whole) who profit enormously from conflicts at home and abroad.

^ and ^^ So true, and You don't mess with anyone who has 4490 nuclear warheads (that we know of). We don't have to like Putin but we do have to either co-exist with him (as Trump wisely understands) or not exist at all. Also unlike North Korea, no one seriously doubts Russia does have the ability to deliver them.

"The exact number of nuclear warheads is a state secret and is therefore a matter of guesswork. The Federation of American Scientists estimates that Russia possesses 4,490 nuclear warheads, while the U.S. has 4,500;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia...ss_destruction

Simple minded lemmings. Stupid fucks

Originally Posted by bsnub

Simple minded lemmings. Stupid fucks

You voted for Hillary and more wars so I can understand your warmongering butt hurt.

report this ad
HOMESUBSCRIBE
BIG GOVERNMENTBIG JOURNALISMBIG HOLLYWOODNATIONAL SECURITYTECHVIDEOSPORTSTHE WIRES2016 : THE RACEBREITBART LONDONBREITBART JERUSALEMBREITBART TEXASBREITBART CALIFORNIASTORE
Facebook
Twitter
RSS

SHOP NOW >
Stanley Black & Decker Announce Opening of New U.S. Plant After Trump White House Win
1481
17
stanley-black-decker
by WARNER TODD HUSTON5 Jan 20173,793
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER


Stanley Black & Decker, one of the U.S.A.’s most well known hand and power tool manufacturers, has unveiled plans to move some manufacturing back to the U.S. after the election of Donald J. Trump to the White House.
In remarks to investors during a Thursday conference call, Stanley Black & Decker CEO James Loree said it just makes “business sense” to move manufacturing back to the U.S., especially given the uncertainty of trade relations with China and Mexico, USA Today reported.

“It’s going to be advisable to have more manufacturing in the U.S.,” Loree added.

“We believe this is an excellent opportunity to re-Americanize and revitalize this legendary brand,” he concluded.

Stanley Black & Decker has been slowly increasing jobs in the U.S. for the past several years. Its current level of some 3,000 workers is already up 800 from 2013. It is not yet known how many more jobs the company will be bringing to the U.S. as a result of its latest announcement.

The remarks come after the company announced the impending purchase of the Sears Craftsman tool line for about $900 million after Sears suffered another round of setbacks which will include the closing of at least 150 more stores.

Stanley Black & Decker is not alone in a sudden interest in re-investing in the U.S. since the election of Donald J. Trump.

Only days ago at the start of the new year, Ford Motors announced it was canceling plans to build new manufacturing facilities in Mexico and will instead re-invest in America.

But Ford is only the latest. A whole list of companies have already promised to bring investment and jobs to America since Trump’s election.

Immediately after Trump’s big November win, such companies as Carrier, SoftBank, U.S. Steel, and IBM all announced major additions to the U.S. job market.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston or email the author at [email protected].