Thread: Deter somebody?

Honestly.....I think it's the right thing to do!!!
This is the only way to lure those cowards out of their holes. If we bomb Mecca then the real terrorists will stand up and show their faces. Remember, bombing Mecca means no one will be killed, but the real Bin Ladens will stand up.
Oh by the way...Pakistan is going down the shitters and that is a good thing! India and China is moving up fast and strong, so Pakistan will be their toiletbowl. Let's give it a flush!!!

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

Honestly.....I think it's the right thing to do!!!
This is the only way to lure those cowards out of their holes. If we bomb Mecca then the real terrorists will stand up and show their faces. Remember, bombing Mecca means no one will be killed, but the real Bin Ladens will stand up.
Oh by the way...Pakistan is going down the shitters and that is a good thing! India and China is moving up fast and strong, so Pakistan will be their toiletbowl. Let's give it a flush!!!

It's the right thing? You really need to broaden your knowledge. Bombing those places means another WW and end of Israel and perhaps an endless attacks on the US.

Anyway, I can't blame Jews like yourself because that's what you really want to happen.

Nothing's gonna happen to Pakland. Believe me! Didn't you hear the President of Pakistan a few days ago? He openly said that "any unilateral operation in our territory will meet tough air and ground resistence!"

Long live Pakland.

Hypothesis

Originally Posted by Reasonable response by a sensible person

Perhaps it’s evidence of a long-shot candidate grasping at straws and trying to create some kind of a controversy that might appeal to a niche audience of anti-Muslim bigots.

Proof

Originally Posted by Bigot replying on queue

Honestly.....I think it's the right thing to do!!!...Pakistan is going down the shitters and that is a good thing.

Well, that would be a good way to stop the recruitment of radical Islamists, -- NOT!!!

When is the US going to wake up and leave the Muslims in the Middle East alone? They will flog their oil on the world market regardless of US military aggression simply because its in their own interest. Only difference is that some of the big US oil companies wouldnt get to cash in on it. A lot of dead bodies in Iraq in the name of big business profit so far. And its certainly not working. Most of Iraq's oil is still in the ground and will stay that way until long after the US gets the hell out of there.

Oh yea, nuking Mecca is sure to get the Muslims on side. Typical US mindset.

Seems that Macha was trolling for a reaction and he got one. He should be giving Herman a big respectful greenie for supporting his thread instead of being rude to him.

Back on topic I don't see the point of nuking a patch of desert, unless you want to smarten up the unemployment statistics in Saudi.

Originally Posted by Begbie

Seems that Macha was trolling for a reaction and he got one. He should be giving Herman a big respectful greenie for supporting his thread instead of being rude to him.

Back on topic I don't see the point of nuking a patch of desert, unless you want to smarten up the unemployment statistics in Saudi.

Thank you! Of course no one wants to bomb anybody or anything (not even little ole Herman). But the reaction is shocking and it should be thought about. I have asked this question many muslims...the reaction was the same. If you don't believe, try it yourself. But be carefull!

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

This is the only way to lure those cowards out of their holes. If we bomb Mecca then the real terrorists will stand up and show their faces.

What nonsense!
You'd have every Muslim who doesn't care about the US one way or the other getting up in arms - the best way to get the US wiped off the map by an army of suicide bombers.

Unfortunately, I don't think Macha was "trolling", this hopeful idiot would get a number of votes from our Issues regulars.

The sheer illogic is amazing, and shows what sort of a vacuum some of these guys live in. And this is a guy who wants to make a run for president.
Attack a target with absolutely no military or strategic value, yet guaranteed to unite every Moslem, domestically and internationally, implacably against you?
How mind numbingly stupid.

Originally Posted by sabang

The sheer illogic is amazing, and shows what sort of a vacuum some of these guys live in. And this is a guy who wants to make a run for president.
Attack a target with absolutely no military or strategic value, yet guaranteed to unite every Moslem, domestically and internationally, implacably against you?
How mind numbingly stupid.

exactly.

and he aint got a hope in hell of making it.

but that wont stop the dickheads on the other side reacting AKA Macha in an entirely ahte filled predicatbale rant!

The Yanks do love bombing impoverished civilians though.
Should get a lot of support from a lot of simple minded US voters.

Originally Posted by Panda

The Yanks do love bombing impoverished civilians though.
Should get a lot of support from a lot of simple minded US voters.

“If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Makkah and Madina,”

Anyway back to discussion, I hope we wont be seeing this guy as the president of N.America. The stooge in office now is enough for the world.

I mean is this the best that America can offer or any retarded scumbag with such violent mentality can find a shot at the presidency of the U.S?

I'm not supporting the stance but look at it this way - the sooner we start the war then the sooner all this shit will end. There is no peaceful solutuon to all this malarky & if nobody makes a move it will go on forever. Let's just crack on & be done with it, one way or another.

What war?
If you actually think that starting some sort of Religious war is even on the minds of the most wacky US administration that I can recall, why then are they about to sell $50bn of arms to the Middle East?

Originally Posted by sabang

What war?
If you actually think that starting some sort of Religious war is even on the minds of the most wacky US administration that I can recall, why then are they about to sell $50bn of arms to the Middle East?

The answer is in the question.

As for what war, I'm talking about the one they started.

I'm not saying 'they' as in all muslims, either, I'm talking about the ones who want to fight. Basically, anyone who joins in the Jihad has got to go & wars have been fought for a lot less.

Originally Posted by shehiredahitman

Originally Posted by sabang

What war?
If you actually think that starting some sort of Religious war is even on the minds of the most wacky US administration that I can recall, why then are they about to sell $50bn of arms to the Middle East?

The answer is in the question.

As for what war, I'm talking about the one they started.

I'm not saying 'they' as in all muslims, either, I'm talking about the ones who want to fight. Basically, anyone who joins in the Jihad has got to go & wars have been fought for a lot less.

duh...

Originally Posted by obsidian

duh...

I know it sounds silly but you know what I'm getting at. I have to put it like that before everyone start calling me a muslim basher.

What the hell do you do about somebody who will gladly blow themselves up while they stand next to you in a nightclub or bus stop?

Only one thing, really.

Originally Posted by sabang

What war?
If you actually think that starting some sort of Religious war is even on the minds of the most wacky US administration that I can recall, why then are they about to sell $50bn of arms to the Middle East?

Not sure if I've posted here but feels as though this thread's slipped through the net...

A religious war has already begun, unilaterally, by the Islamists, and our leaders well know that's precisely what it is even through their gritted teeth denials and the distraction of a WoT...this may be open to nitpicking but has been stated unambiguously by not one or a dozen but hundreds of influential Islamic figures, and can't see any reasonable argument against it.

It probably will not develop into a full blown affair, for many reasons not least that most Muslims living in the West are productive and an integral part of their societies, and of course if it did that would be the catalyst for the downfall of civilisation as we know it. No clarification needed, that too should be clear.

Also, in the context of Iraq and the so called WoT that some claim is the reason there are so many budding terrorists eager to sign up, the number of innocent and culpable Muslims killed is irrelevant, since the recruiters are recruiting and would have been recruiting without Afghanistan, Iraq, profiling, Abu Ghraib or any other of the myriad retaliatory pretexts, their breeding stocks are by design ignorant, repressed and fully compliant in line with Islamic teachings they are brought up with, and it matters little to none that the Western powers are scooping up as much oil as they can, because the alternative is stagnation for both Western societies, which are overly dependent on the stuff, and the oil bearers, who cannot drink it. That consequence may be utopia for some, but not for the advanced nations.

As to why arms producers east and west trample over each other to get their wares into the ME, this is part and parcel of the corporate government, neither the suppliers nor the end users have much choice in the matter, oil is demanded, has to be paid for, and suppliers want a military deterrent as well as the perception of stability and national pride enjoyed by the latest toys.

We need their oil and they need what we have to offer, be it arms, new cities, extravagances, diplomatic accommodation or ego boosting high level hospitality, a symbiotic relationship, and though there are many flaws and conflicts in how the principle is practiced, somehow it plods along causing fewer problems than any viable alternative, which is implicit. For now.

Oil will always be needed, if only for lubrication, but once a truly concerned US admin awakens to realise it has to disregard short term corporate need and greed, and starts the ball rolling in a serious long term effort to develop a viable alternative, and until the West is able to sustain its oil-driven growth via that alternative power source, our leaders will go cap in hand to the suppliers, and if necessary give them arms that they know may ultimately be used against the free world.

Small picture or big picture.

Deter Something? Deter is a very unique name. I doubt he is an American. I cannot help at all with the last name.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

For you guys its o.k. to shoot the Pope, blow up churches and even mosques, tear down Buddha statues, and kill inocent people who write about islam.

Are you dreaming? I haven't read anyone here saying anything of the kind.

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

P.S. ACHTUNG !!! Herr Stroller: I don't think it's smart to keep on reding me like a little child and using the name yids. Show more constrain as an admin.

Will you please refrain from lying about me?
I will red you now, btw.

Originally Posted by shehiredahitman

I'm not saying 'they' as in all muslims, either, I'm talking about the ones who want to fight. Basically, anyone who joins in the Jihad has got to go & wars have been fought for a lot less.

Maybe the US should invade the UK to get rid of the Brit terrorists there?