Thread: Liberal Double Standards

That's yet to be seen, but as far as the race goes it seems to have attracted more than the usual number of village idiots...that said originality traits seem to be sub normal for the Dem.'s in that they have hooked their wagon to that tired old lesbian wannabe Jillery...no other contenders dare challenge her RIGHT to the Presidency...If you wanna laugh laugh at that bsnub...

I keep hoping for a Will Rogers Moment!

Originally Posted by ltnt

can't fight this one Boon Mee, Cruz is damaged goods on delivery...I see he's your icon, but this guys all fk'd up! No two ways about it.

Long way to go to 2016. Like the NFL axiom: 'On Any Sunday'

True enough BoonMee, anything can happen we've just lived through the unthinkable and its not over yet... All good here mate...Cruz is a wanker however!

Originally Posted by sabang

The middle ground that determines elections (and of course the libbies) are appalled by them- but grumpy, resentful old southern and rural white men still form a loyal demographic. It is the only thing that keeps them vaguely relevant.

Steriotypical of leftism streaming rebuttals...next one coming sabang?

No, I rest my case. Congressional approval ratings plumb new depths- I wonder why?
And just like last time, I will be proven right again- Cruz has no chance, will not even get the GOP nomination.
Shillary will win (subject only to her running). Youll see. Care to bet against me?
Oh, Elizabeth Warren has no chance either, will not even get the Dem nomination.
And anyone that runs as an Independent, will do so as an unfunded pauper. No chance.
That's US politics for ya, regrettably. The only way to change the system is attack the money control.

I'd bet against that sabang. Jillery is newspaper lining for bird cages now. I think there's a chance or opportunity for a new democrat to emerge from the rank and file in the next 18 months and take the nomination and possibly take the Presidency.

The Republicans are stumbling around without purpose just slogans and not a lot of "can do," while stumbling about. They really are not the party of the people nor the party with the answers to what ails Americas lawmakers.

They were recently tabbed to change the face of politics, recent laws, and revolt against Obamas one man show. So far the results are pretty sad. More like whipped puppies than a shot in the arm.

So many obvious problems within Americas lawmakers that its like shooting ducks when it comes to making changes that would improve the lives of Americans and foreign policies of America. So sanctimonious all of them. all afraid of loosing their little jobs, so by doing nothing they remain until the next piece of cake is offered up.

To little to late should be the quote for all of American politics. The parties without intent. You are correct that the first one's with their snouts in the money pots are the politicians...all others shall wait.

Double Standards by proclamation.

Originally Posted by quimbian corholla

Tehran Tom Cotton throws his hat into the ring,

I'll have to admit QC I'm not familiar with this fellow you tout. I'll have to get back to you on Tom Cotton after I do a Google...sill boy.

Originally Posted by ltnt

Jillery is newspaper lining for bird cages now. I think there's a chance or opportunity for a new democrat to emerge from the rank and file in the next 18 months and take the nomination and possibly take the Presidency.

I'd like you to be right, but I don't think so. Still, there is always the unforeseen- she may be caught in bed with a dead boy or a live woman, or perhaps health issue's will upset the gravy train. She is showing her age.

^ He's the traitorous junior Senator. Shoe in as running mate for Tom Cruz, if the money wants to assure a Democrat clean sweep.

'Ol Tom probably deserves his own thread as he's become a Republican Superstar almost overnight.

Tom Cotton To Gays Of America: At Least You're Not Living In Iran

Tom Cotton To Gays Of America: At Least You're Not Living In Iran

I'm back from a Googling experience on Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, 37 year old red neck conservative hated by all alternative politicos recently flamed for stating that "Gays ought to be thankful they aren't executed for being homosexual." Referencing the gay experience in a Islamic led world.

The site was thrilled over just how extraordinary this guys point of view were listing 10 of his greatest and most notorious statements and support thereof.

I somehow suspect QC that Mr. Cotton won't be running for President in the near future, however his electorate seems very pleased with his position on all 10 topics.

You know its refreshing to find a Senator who actually speaks his mind. Not that anyone will agree with a lot of what he spouts, but for sheer balls hes definitely got some very big ones. Have agree with you QC, not many folks of the dark complexion will be posting any votes for this guy. I'm wondering how he got elected in Arkansas in the first place? He seems to have the Karizma of David Duke.

Well sabang, Its a long way to the finish line in American Politics, but this race won't be sporting two contenders at the finishline who are almost octogenerians when and if they get elected.

Think about another Reagan who didn't know what day its was most of his second term? Leaving his suit in office during those years was criminal and a complete disservice to the proletariat. The GOP likes to use Reagan as their poster boy for conservatives, but he was out of his head almost from the starting line, simply reading his lines provided by Dr.'s Nancy and George...

Hilliary comes across as a bit "too deserving," in manner and speech. Perhaps that's the part of her that will eventually kill her final run. Bill's still got the attraction, but even he is running on "empty," these days. Obama will kill the Clinton's off before he leaves office. Rest assured of that.

PBS Censored Fact That Ben Affleck Had Slave-Owning Ancestor From TV Show At Affleck’s Insistence

Ben Affleck insisted on censoring the fact that one of his ancestors owned slaves from PBS show “Finding Your Roots,” the Sony email hack has revealed.
In a hacked Sony email from July 22, 2014, now available on WikiLeaks, the show’s host, Henry Louis Gates Jr., writes to Sony USA chief Michael Lynton asking for advice: “One of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors–the fact that he owned slaves. Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We’ve never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He’s a megastar. What do we do?”

Lynton’s advice was to take Affleck’s family secret out of the show, as long as nobody would find out. The Sony chairman and CEO writes, “On the doc the big question is who knows that the material is in the doc and is being taken out. I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky.”

Affleck demanded PBS program hide his slave-owning ancestor | Page Six

Well, there you go - Ben Affleck, huge liberal, apparently didn’t want it out and PBS a hard Left organization covered for him.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

hard Left

PBS has some excellent programming and is about the best broadcaster in the US. It also plays within the rules, which is not what a real hard left organization would do.

Originally Posted by Munted

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

hard Left

PBS has some excellent programming and is about the best broadcaster in the US. It also plays within the rules, which is not what a real hard left organization would do.

Well, perhaps you're right. PBS really isn't as far off into the fever swamps like MSNBC for example.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

PBS Censored Fact That Ben Affleck Had Slave-Owning Ancestor From TV Show At Affleck’s Insistence

Ben Affleck insisted on censoring the fact that one of his ancestors owned slaves from PBS show “Finding Your Roots,” the Sony email hack has revealed.
In a hacked Sony email from July 22, 2014, now available on WikiLeaks, the show’s host, Henry Louis Gates Jr., writes to Sony USA chief Michael Lynton asking for advice: “One of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors–the fact that he owned slaves. Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We’ve never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He’s a megastar. What do we do?”

Lynton’s advice was to take Affleck’s family secret out of the show, as long as nobody would find out. The Sony chairman and CEO writes, “On the doc the big question is who knows that the material is in the doc and is being taken out. I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky.”

Affleck demanded PBS program hide his slave-owning ancestor | Page Six

Well, there you go - Ben Affleck, huge liberal, apparently didn’t want it out and PBS a hard Left organization covered for him.

Surely they can't be talking about Ben Affleck when they say "He's a megastar"?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

PBS Censored Fact That Ben Affleck Had Slave-Owning Ancestor From TV Show At Affleck’s Insistence

Ben Affleck insisted on censoring the fact that one of his ancestors owned slaves from PBS show “Finding Your Roots,” the Sony email hack has revealed.
In a hacked Sony email from July 22, 2014, now available on WikiLeaks, the show’s host, Henry Louis Gates Jr., writes to Sony USA chief Michael Lynton asking for advice: “One of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors–the fact that he owned slaves. Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We’ve never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He’s a megastar. What do we do?”

Lynton’s advice was to take Affleck’s family secret out of the show, as long as nobody would find out. The Sony chairman and CEO writes, “On the doc the big question is who knows that the material is in the doc and is being taken out. I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky.”

Affleck demanded PBS program hide his slave-owning ancestor | Page Six

Well, there you go - Ben Affleck, huge liberal, apparently didn’t want it out and PBS a hard Left organization covered for him.

Surely they can't be talking about Ben Affleck when they say "He's a megastar"?

Well, he was once married to JLo.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

PBS Censored Fact That Ben Affleck Had Slave-Owning Ancestor From TV Show At Affleck’s Insistence

Ben Affleck insisted on censoring the fact that one of his ancestors owned slaves from PBS show “Finding Your Roots,” the Sony email hack has revealed.
In a hacked Sony email from July 22, 2014, now available on WikiLeaks, the show’s host, Henry Louis Gates Jr., writes to Sony USA chief Michael Lynton asking for advice: “One of our guests has asked us to edit out something about one of his ancestors–the fact that he owned slaves. Now, four or five of our guests this season descend from slave owners, including Ken Burns. We’ve never had anyone ever try to censor or edit what we found. He’s a megastar. What do we do?”

Lynton’s advice was to take Affleck’s family secret out of the show, as long as nobody would find out. The Sony chairman and CEO writes, “On the doc the big question is who knows that the material is in the doc and is being taken out. I would take it out if no one knows, but if it gets out that you are editing the material based on this kind of sensitivity then it gets tricky.”

Affleck demanded PBS program hide his slave-owning ancestor | Page Six

Well, there you go - Ben Affleck, huge liberal, apparently didn’t want it out and PBS a hard Left organization covered for him.

Surely they can't be talking about Ben Affleck when they say "He's a megastar"?

Well, he was once married to JLo.

Are you sure? I thought he was just shagging her.

Here we go...#ProgressivePrivilege: Tim Tebow Picked Up By Philadelphia – Progressives Immediately Attack His Religion



You knew this was coming.

Tim Tebow was tapped by Philadelphia over the weekend, to play for the Eagles. Good for you Tim!

Unfortunately, news of Tim’s good fortune was too much for some Progressives to take.

Fire Andrea Mitchell reports:

Tim Tebow signing with the Eagles has brought out the typical, anti-Christian leftist bigots in full force on social media.

Anti Christian leftists on Tim Tebow signing with Eagles

What's wrong with these people?

What is it about progressives?

First Elizabeth Warren tells us that if we have a business we didn’t build it ourselves.

Then Mellissa Harris-Perry told us that our own children aren’t ours either.





Back to you...

^ Nutter. Watched a couple more of her videos. How does someone like that get a job in broadcasting?

Originally Posted by Koojo

^ Nutter. Watched a couple more of her videos. How does someone like that get a job in broadcasting?

Right skin color?

Democrats Defend Political Persecutions in Texas.

"The Deep State is doing its best to frustrate the voters. “When a governor can be indicted for vetoing a bill, when a university regent can be threatened with criminal prosecution for exposing corruption, and when you have armed men kicking down your door because you signed the wrong petition, you don’t live in a free society—you live in a police state. And that is what Democrats are building, from Austin to Milwaukee to Washington.”

Democrats Defend Political Persecutions in Texas | National Review Online

So, it's not just in Scott Walker's Wisconsin then. It's happening all over the USA.

Back to you...

National Review Online.
National Review Online

Some source. You're one of a number of middle aged & aging whiteguys that feed themselves on this diet booner, and you are a declining demographic.

So let me counter with a demographic question. As one born in the most privileged country in the world at that time, to the most privileged demographic (white and male), to the most privileged generation ever in the history of mankind, a privilege nowhere near matched by your own children and grandchildren, why do you think the whole world as you know it is a threat to you? Why do you feel relentlessly picked on, oh child of privilege?

Waddya want, sympathy or a welfare handout?