Thread: Liberal Double Standards

Originally Posted by sabang

Waddya want...

A fair & balanced reporting of the days events.

Too much to ask?

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

A fair & balanced reporting of the days events.

Thats grand coming from you.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

“When a governor can be indicted for vetoing a bill”

To what does this refer?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

“When a governor can be indicted for vetoing a bill”

To what does this refer?

Texas Governor Rick Perry, a victim of left-wing vindictive reprisals.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

“When a governor can be indicted for vetoing a bill”

To what does this refer?

Texas Governor Rick Perry, a victim of left-wing vindictive reprisals.

He wasn't indicted for vetoing a bill.

He was indicted for breaking state law by abusing his authority.

So that's you posting lies again then.

^Boon Mee's a retarded hick with an agenda.

Sad as that is - that's the score.

^He's not a hick!


The rest.....

^ Must be a slow news day.

So the racist Repiblitards ran out of excuses.

Great news!

Got an excellent example for y'all this afternoon.

Of course: Facebook page calls for boycott of gay businessmen who hosted reception for Ted Cruz; Update: Charity cancels event in protest

Check out this "post from the boycott page, which now has more than 3,000 “likes.” It used to be that many straights viewed gays as so far beneath contempt that they wouldn’t want to shake their hands or invite them into their living rooms. Fifty years of the gay-rights movement has changed that, not universally but enough that the GOP’s leading “true conservative” candidate for president would be willing to attend a campaign reception in a gay businessman’s home. An ironic monument to “progress”

The money quote from the piece:

"Conservative are more likely to accept me as gay, he claimed, than gays are to accept me as conservative."

What's up with that???



Gay NYC Hoteliers Face Boycott for Hosting Ted Cruz Reception | Mediaite

Of course: Facebook page calls for boycott of gay businessmen who hosted reception for Ted Cruz; Update: Charity cancels event in protest « Hot Air

^Part of the one way gay tolerance/liberal voice...amazing how thoughtless their politics are. bigot is the first thing out of their lips. In this instance wonder what they are calling the hotel owners?

^^ Fake as hell. The part of the mediate post you left out;

"Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler told The Washington Examiner that they probably should have vetted the venue in advance, and that they wouldn’t have had it there if they had done so: “I would say, knowing what we know now about the setting, I think we would have chosen a different venue.”

Originally Posted by ltnt

Part of the one way gay tolerance/liberal voice.

The brainless lemmings are quick to take the bait.

Originally Posted by ltnt

^Part of the one way gay tolerance/liberal voice...amazing how thoughtless their politics are. bigot is the first thing out of their lips. In this instance wonder what they are calling the hotel owners?

They are, in general, very untrustworthy as well.

Do as I say. Not do as I do...

Yet another vendictive post by the bsnub..he just hates it when the right hand knows what the left hands doing. Is there any particular reason you stay awake nights well into dawn in Seattle posting on a Thailand forum?

What prescription drugs are you using?

Originally Posted by ltnt

Yet another vendictive post by the bsnub..he just hates it when the right hand knows what the left hands doing. Is there any particular reason you stay awake nights well into dawn in Seattle posting on a Thailand forum?

What prescription drugs are you using?

The funny part is he hasn't ever been to LOS.

Strange boy

On Topic:

bsnub's behavior is typical of the Lib w/out an argument. Name-calling and vitriol are the only come-backs.

Originally Posted by ltnt

Yet another vendictive post by the bsnub..he just hates it when the right hand knows what the left hands doing.

You simpletons have no clue what hand is what. You are robots who spout what your handlers tell you. Laughable.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

The funny part is he hasn't ever been to LOS.

You know this how?

Oh s...nubby, your so freking stupid. Get a life elsewhere...find another country to squirt your oral jizzim on. You are perhaps the most "tedious," person on Teak Door.

Has Seattle's IT circles banned you from posting on any web in the entire state? Wish TD would do us all a favor and ban your ass for life. Singular poster on T.D. from Seattle who has never set foot on Thailands shores. What a joke.

A complete looser.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

bsnub's behavior is typical of the Lib w/out an argument. Name-calling and vitriol are the only come-backs.

Deflect deflect deflect. Typical Koch robot.

Originally Posted by ltnt

Has Seattle's IT circles banned you from posting on any web in the entire state?

You old lemmings are bitter and stupid.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

"Conservative are more likely to accept me as gay, he claimed, than gays are to accept me as conservative."

Try again when Marcus Bachmann opens a conservative reparation therapy clinic!

Originally Posted by bsnub

You old lemmings are bitter and stupid.

They were not "lemings," but rather very much on point. Sadly removed. You just keep posting your nonsense nibby and we'll see who has the last laugh...

Unreal: LA Union Leaders Who Successfully Backed Raising Minimum Wage To $15 An Hour Now Seek Exemption For Union Workers…

Makes perfect Liberal sense!

Labor leaders, who were among the strongest supporters of the citywide minimum wage increase approved last week by the Los Angeles City Council, are advocating last-minute changes to the law that could create an exemption for companies with unionized workforces.

The push to include an exception to the mandated wage increase for companies that let their employees collectively bargain was the latest unexpected detour as the city nears approval of its landmark legislation to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2020.

For much of the past eight months, labor activists have argued against special considerations for business owners, such as restaurateurs, who said they would have trouble complying with the mandated pay increase.

But Rusty Hicks, who heads the county Federation of Labor and helps lead the Raise the Wage coalition, said Tuesday night that companies with workers represented by unions should have leeway to negotiate a wage below that mandated by the law.

“With a collective bargaining agreement, a business owner and the employees negotiate an agreement that works for them both. The agreement allows each party to prioritize what is important to them,” Hicks said in a statement. “This provision gives the parties the option, the freedom, to negotiate that agreement. And that is a good thing.”

L.A. labor leaders seek minimum wage exemption for firms with union workers - LA Times

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

Unreal: LA Union Leaders Who Successfully Backed Raising Minimum Wage To $15 An Hour Now Seek Exemption For Union Workers…

Makes perfect Liberal sense!

Labor leaders, who were among the strongest supporters of the citywide minimum wage increase approved last week by the Los Angeles City Council, are advocating last-minute changes to the law that could create an exemption for companies with unionized workforces.

The push to include an exception to the mandated wage increase for companies that let their employees collectively bargain was the latest unexpected detour as the city nears approval of its landmark legislation to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2020.

For much of the past eight months, labor activists have argued against special considerations for business owners, such as restaurateurs, who said they would have trouble complying with the mandated pay increase.

But Rusty Hicks, who heads the county Federation of Labor and helps lead the Raise the Wage coalition, said Tuesday night that companies with workers represented by unions should have leeway to negotiate a wage below that mandated by the law.

“With a collective bargaining agreement, a business owner and the employees negotiate an agreement that works for them both. The agreement allows each party to prioritize what is important to them,” Hicks said in a statement. “This provision gives the parties the option, the freedom, to negotiate that agreement. And that is a good thing.”

L.A. labor leaders seek minimum wage exemption for firms with union workers - LA Times

Yes Booners, once again you missed the whole point by a mile.

Gonzalez said the change sought by labor officials could pressure companies into letting employees unionize as a way to seek relief from the mandated wage hike.

Originally Posted by Boon Mee

But Rusty Hicks, who heads the county Federation of Labor and helps lead the Raise the Wage coalition, said Tuesday night that companies with workers represented by unions should have leeway to negotiate a wage below that mandated by the law.

Which opens the doorway for the Unions excuse's for not negotiating for $15/hr for its members in the first place.

Secondly, the Union looses its hold on its members once they accept the City's min. wage increase of $15/hr. and the Union boss is out of a job...funny how that works Hairy...

I recall the days when Unions would call a strike and you had to go out. Lasting 6 months and on the return to work your Union had negotiated a whopping .10 cent per hour raise...which you never recovered from since you lost 6 months work and pay...yup I hate the Union. One of the biggest reasons I returned to school. Guess I can thank them for that push eh?

$15/hr. now in L.A. I bet they still cannot find folks willing to flip burgers or clean toilets for that. Welfare state California screwing the tax payers again.