Thread: How dangerous is Vladimir Putin?

Originally Posted by Klondyke

In contrast to some who believe only what the trustful MSM (WaPo, NYT, FFF, etc) write...



Pity, that the Guardian's reporters (or others) did not snap the paycheck queue... (but perhaps they were strip checked when leaving the stadium, weren't they?)

Since TheGuardian had been heavily involved in the WikiLeaks disclosure, they have been doing all they can to be back again among the "recognized MSM"...

Seems like a gibberish attempt to parrot our forum tin foil hat brigade.

I'd quite while you're behind.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I'm guessing the forum nincompoop doesn't believe it because it wasn't on RT.

The main thing is you are objective and know all the facts.

Originally Posted by global

The main thing is you are objective and know all the facts.

Well fucknuts seems to think there's the "lying MSM" and the "truthful RT".

Very fucking clever that is innit.

Vlad doesn't take criticism well does he. I'm sure he'd love to slip the feller a cup of his famous Polonium tea but that would make him a martyr.

Police have detained Russia’s opposition leader Alexei Navalny at a demonstration against Vladimir Putin in central Moscow.
Thousands of demonstrators denouncing the Russian president’s imminent inauguration for a fourth term on 7 May gathered on Saturday in the capital’s Pushkin Square.
Video showed police carrying a struggling Navalny, who is Putin’s most prominent opponent, out of the square by the arms and legs.
The unauthorised protest was part of nationwide demonstrations called by Navalny under the slogan “He is not our tsar”.
Police also made arrests at demonstrations in other cities, but no overall figure was immediately available.About 150 people were detained in Krasnoyarsk, in eastern Siberia and 75 in Yakutsk, the capital of a diamond-mining region in north-east Russia.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...esters-siberia

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The unauthorised protest was part of nationwide demonstrations called by Navalny

I suppose you missed the "unauthorised" bit.

One wonders what reaction western countries leaders would adopt if "thousands" of protesters marched, "unauthorised" through the streets of London, Paris, Dublin or Washington. Are amerstanis allowed to conceal carry weapons in "unauthorised street marches"?

Originally Posted by OhOh

"unauthorised" through the streets of London, Paris, Dublin or Washington.

Somewhere they have got an "authorised" one, however, the govt is not happy either...

Thousands protest against Macron under heavy security in Paris

Police out in force for demonstration over reforms after May Day disturbances

Police were out in force in central Paris on Saturday as thousands of people protested against Emmanuel Macron’s sweeping reforms a year after he assumed the presidency.

About 2,000 members of the security forces, including riot police, were deployed as marchers gathered in warm spring sunshine in Opera square for a protest labelled a “party for Macron”, a tongue-in-cheek “celebration” of the 40-year-old centrist’s first anniversary in power.

The event began with a mass picnic, and smaller rallies took place in the southern cities of Toulouse and Bordeaux

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...urity-in-paris

Originally Posted by OhOh

I suppose you missed the "unauthorised" bit.

One wonders what reaction western countries leaders would adopt if "thousands" of protesters marched, "unauthorised" through the streets of London, Paris, Dublin or Washington. Are amerstanis allowed to conceal carry weapons in "unauthorised street marches"?

And what do you think the chances are that Putin would "authorise" demonstrates against his criminal rule?

Waffling again.

Originally Posted by OhOh

I suppose you missed the "unauthorised" bit.

One wonders what reaction western countries leaders would adopt if "thousands" of protesters marched, "unauthorised" through the streets of London, Paris, Dublin or Washington. Are amerstanis allowed to conceal carry weapons in "unauthorised street marches"?

Maybe you could enlighten us to how many political opposition leaders have been arrested at protest marches in western Democracies? Or how many that have been "mysteriously" murdered a stones throw from the white house houses of parliament etc with no one caught or held accountable. While you're about it please let me know how many anti May and anti Trump journalists have been murdered.
As much as I respect you are entitled to offer an alternative point of view (IMHO a must in any forum of ideas) and you do make valid points on occasion, your slavish obsequiousness of all things Putin and your almost obsessive anti Americanism, makes it difficult for some to take you seriously on any issue.
Whilst America has many things to answer for, so do the British Russians, Chinese, Iranians, Israelis, Turks and many others. Recognising faults in one country should not blind you to the faults of the countries you so obviously seem to want to defend and promote. The irony is these same countries that you criticise are the only ones that would allow you the freedom to criticise them. Try criticising Putin in Russia or Xi in China, or if you really are a thrill seeker try Kim in Nth Korea. The very fact that TD's intellectual giant kloneddick supports you should at least give you pause for thought.

Originally Posted by Hugh Cow

Maybe you could enlighten us to how many political opposition leaders have been arrested at protest marches in western Democracies?

Ever heard/read about Catalonia?

Or how many that have been "mysteriously" murdered a stones throw from the white house houses of parliament etc with no one caught or held accountable

Many, many, some of them in the park nearby, some not so nearby, some never much publisized, some just suicides (the lists are well known - but surely some conspiratorial), some in the middle of an army of bodyguards, any posible scenarios...

Originally Posted by OhOh

I am sure THE LORD would authorise a peaceful march conducted with due respect to the citizens living in the area, conformance to guidelines etc.

I'm sure he would, providing he could populate it with brainwashed idiots like yourself waving banners such as "Vladimir, don't love us so much" or "Vladimir, please stop being so kind and generous".

Originally Posted by OhOh

And then there's 'arry with his anarchy (without government of any sort) option, always being pushed.

And that's your problem. You spend so much time waffling the Putin party line that you don't actually read what other people post.

You'll find not a single post from me advocating such anarchy, and frankly stating as much makes you look a complete fucking moron.

harry, under Nazi Germany, you would have been quite the cheerboy for the regime actions

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You'll find not a single post from me advocating such anarchy

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

And what do you think the chances are that Putin would "authorise" demonstrates against his criminal rule

Calling for anarchy!

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

harry, under Nazi Germany, you would have been quite the cheerboy for the regime actions

Ha! Harry couldn't be a "cheerboy" on his best day in life. Anyway, perhaps you should do some real, in-depth research, regarding the true facts of Nazi Germany.

Here's a clue. If today's Putin (instead of Stalin) had been the Soviet Premier, in 1940, then we'd all be living in a very different 21st. Century world; guaranteed.

Originally Posted by OhOh

Calling for anarchy!

Sounds to me like you're losing it.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly
harry, under Nazi Germany, you would have been quite the cheerboy for the regime actions

Ha! Harry couldn't be a "cheerboy" on his best day in life. Anyway, perhaps you should do some real, in-depth research, regarding the true facts of Nazi Germany.

Here's a clue. If today's Putin (instead of Stalin) had been the Soviet Premier, in 1940, then we'd all be living in a very different 21st. Century world; guaranteed.

It's quite hard to work out which is the bigger fuckwit.

Originally Posted by TuskegeeBen

Here's a clue. If today's Putin (instead of Stalin) had been the Soviet Premier, in 1940, then we'd all be living in a very different 21st. Century world; guaranteed.

Care to elaborate?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

It's quite hard to work out which is the bigger fuckwit.

you of course, dear

How dangerous? Now. sure... (the question: dangerous for who?)

Putin sworn in for fourth presidential term



https://www.rt.com/news/426026-vladi...uration-video/

Live form Red Square"
https://www.rt.com/on-air/

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Live form Red Square"
https://www.rt.com/on-air/

What is it with you, old moustachioed generals or all those white boy soldiers?

THE LORD remembers his roots and as an aside pushes Israel to the second row.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co...&v=qlN8mCNBRmk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_co...&v=7g4d0SC-KDQ


An old soldier is manhandled away by "security". he stops and apologises for the "security" teams behaviour. The old soldier is invited to join the front row. Israeli leader goes to the second row, possibly expecting to be attacked. The LORD continues along the route with the Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and the old soldier chatting and smiling.

The Israeli leader with a glum expression, realising the cameras are rolling, quickly accelerates to the end of the front roe but is ignored by all.

THE LORD, dangerous or an accommodating decision maker, you decide.

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnastier

Sadly mate, these days the only choice is between corrupt and fvcking corrupt. At least we still have a vote ( )

If by the "we", you mean (US citizens) still have the vote, then obviously you are young......very young, indeed! Anyway, have a happy, blissful lifeon Coronation Street. Cheers!

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Care to elaborate?

No! Figure it out for yourself. If you succeed, then you'd be well-advised, to keep it totally to "yourself". Capisce?