How dangerous is Vladimir Putin?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I bet the ones shipped off to the gulags or executed by his assassins don't see it that

---

Dream on and keep taking the happy pills, they can alter ones perception of many things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

There was a recent NATO report that said it doesn't have enough serviceable equipment or manpower to effectively defend Europe against a full scale invasion by Russia.

---

They are "pre-positioning the heavy stuff" as we speak. You know, right on the border with Russia. The promised "no NATO eastwards expansion agreement" just forgotten. One wonders if the British had just"forgotten" thier agreement with Czechoslovakia things may have ended differently.

Just like the "prepositioning of weapons on the borders of Iraq. They lost that battle and they think they can take on the LORD and his buddies.

No problem the UK and French governments have so much cash lying around they will buy everyone protection. They will "probably" help keep an eye on the UK citizens, be they in Bradford or Idlib.

https://www.rt.com/uk/334444-cameron...de-drone-deal/

The true believers/advocates in democracy bypass it once again.

https://www.rt.com/uk/334402-trident...t-fallon-vote/

The Ukrainian government fails, once again, to abide by an agreement they and others signed.

https://www.rt.com/news/334469-ukrai...-talks-lavrov/

The shooting down of the MH!& airplane over Ukraine territory still rumbles on.

It appears even when asked by the "Dutch Criminal Investigators" the AmeristanIs refuse to hand over their radar coverage of the area taken at the time. Don't forget this has been under investigation for nearly two years now. It is stated that the parties "assist each other" and "continue to communicate" with each other. Here is a government employee "communicating", or not. You decide

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1aX0gXkaRI

The Russian offered theirs but the offer was not taken up by the investigators. The Ameristanis were asked but still refuse.

"The US State Department declined to answer questions about what information Washington may have shared with the Dutch authorities in the MH-17 probe. Dutch parliamentarians have criticized the absence of evidence the US said it had about the incident.


Malaysia Airlines Flight MH-17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014, killing all 298 on board, most of them citizens of the Netherlands. The Dutch Safety Board released a report into the incident last October, concluding the plane was shot down by a surface-fired anti-aircraft missile. However, recently revealed government correspondence admitted the investigators had no raw radar data, useful footage or satellite images of the missile launch.


Among the questions raised by Dutch MPs was an issue concerning raw radar data and satellite imagery that the United States claimed to have in its possession and which it called strong evidence.
When asked about this data, State Department spokesman John Kirby referred reporters to the Dutch government, insisting only that the US was “working together” with the investigators.


“What kind of data has the US shared with Dutch investigators on the downing of MH-17?” asked RT’s Gayane Chichakyan.


“I’m actually not going to be able to give you a lot of information on that,” Kirby replied. “There’s still an active review going on and I’d refer you to the Dutch government. I’m not going to be able to give you much more detail on that.”

“You haven’t given us any detail, at all. Not ‘much more,’ – there’s none,” objected AP’s diplomatic correspondent Matt Lee.
“We’ve continued to communicate,” Kirby persisted. “We’re continuing to communicate right now, but I’m not getting any answers, and no one else is here,” Lee shot back. “So what does that mean?” “It means that we’re cooperating with them and assisting them in their efforts. I’m not going to get into the details of what that is,” Kirby was adamant. “But that answer means nothing!” Lee said. “I’ve answered the question,” Kirby replied, referring all further question on the subject to the Dutch government."




Spokesman certainly is no "exceptional" communicator. Maybe the "reporters" are wasting their time attending such farces.


Has he been employed to parrot nonsense, is the position he holds of the wrong grade or are the AmeritanIs lying and not fulfilling agreements undertaken when they joined the Civil Aircraft organisation.

You'r not still peddling that bullshit are you?

The Russians shot it down.

Get over it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

That's a bit lazy OhOh,

---

Yes it is. :tieme:

Unfortunately until somebody starts rebuilding the the devastated cities and uncovering the bodies buried under the rubble, the real numbers are completely unknown and any quoted, must be treated with suspicion. Not that numbers really matter. If a countries government is committing genocide, it is committing genocide. Which has historically required UN sanctions. Against the country, it's leaders and of course mainly the suffering citizens. There are numerous current or recently rescinded sanctioned or invaded countries for far less:

#1 “We Can’t Stand Aside And Watch xxxx Kill His Own People” - We have plenty of weapons you can buy.
#2 “It Would Just Be A Humanitarian Mission” - The never ending feeling of being saved is financially beneficial to us.
#3 “xxxx Is Torturing Prisoners“ - Just like we do , world wide.
#4 “The xxxx Rebels Will Not Be Able To Take Down xxxxx Without Our Help” - Or with it seemingly.
#5 “U.S. Interests Are Being Threatened” - Being an "exceptional country" we need more vassals.
#6 “xxxxx Is Crazy” - Look how he dresses, shit he sleeps in a tent.
#7 “xxxxx Has Weapons Of Mass Destruction“ "Probably"
#8 “xxxxi Will Use Chemical Weapons If We Don’t Stop Him” - He "probably" has some that he "probably" will use "sometime".
#9 “xxxx Has “1,000 Metric Tons Of Uranium Yellowcake“ - Look at the piece of paper I am holding up at this windswept airport, look at the image my assistant has displayed, on this very big screen and in this very important venue.
#10 “European Energy Companies Are Deeply Invested In xxxx Oil And Gas Fields” - The contracts are up for renewal and the terms are making it less profitable for us.
#11 “Millions of Dollars Worth Of Infrastructure Will Be Destroyed If We Don’t Intervene” - We may not win the reconstruction/repair/upgrade contracts unless the installed government is our lackey.
#12 “The Crisis In xxxx Is Bad For The Global Economy” - WE need to export some more bombs....
#13 “Someone Has To Protect The (insert image of baby, rabbit or fish swimming in crystal clear water)” We need more vassals to sell too.
#14 “We Have Got To Go Into xxxx To Keep (insert current global threat name here) From Getting A Foothold” - We are losing control of an outsider country and our competitor is making unacceptable inroads.


Some countries "leaders" were condemned to death for similar crimes against humanity. Some countries were "bombed back to the stone age", not once but it's continually going on TODAY Now some "exceptional" countries use the throwaway term "collateral damage". How moral standards have diminished for some.

The quoted sources are immediately discarded by most, mainly because they are not the "top" rated - by google/facefu.../or any other western owned media outlet.

If you want real "out of your mind stories" I suggest WhatDoesItMean.com

---

Dont really want to quibble but you have the answers to #7 and #8 wrong

#7. We know they do we sold them to them when they were our friends.

#8 . They have probably used them all on our previous enemies by now but just in case they have some left...........

Well it was said often that the yanks knew he had chemical weapons because "they had all the receipts".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You'r not still peddling that bullshit are you?

The Russians shot it down.

Get over it.

---

I don't think there is a low to which SoSo won't go.
Truth be damned.

(Get ready for a slew of nonsense rhetorical questions defending his Lord.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You'r not still peddling that bullshit are you?

The Russians shot it down.

Get over it.

---

I don't think there is a low to which SoSo won't go.
Truth be damned.

(Get ready for a slew of nonsense rhetorical questions defending his Lord.

---

I don't think it's religiously motivated, I think it's just a big gay crush.

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I think it's just a big gay crush.

---

Harry... you're projecting again :)

https://teakdoor.com/images/smilies1/You_Rock_Emoticon.gif

Gives you a semi as well, does he?

These Putin lovers are all fucking perverts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrG

(Get ready for a slew of nonsense rhetorical questions defending his Lord.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I don't think it's religiously motivated, I think it's just a big gay crush.

---

The LORD is the Leader Of the Russian Democracy, nothing religious about his title or his actions.

Just
1. Creating a plan,
2. Following the plan,
3. Adjusting the plan
4. Actually delivering results.

Many of your politicians would love to be able to do one, if not all of those, unfortunately their plans turn out to be one big lie.

Just an aside, I do not have the privilege of voting in Russia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

These Putin lovers are all fucking perverts.

---

Allegedly, 80% of Russian voters "adore" him. A number from other countries thinks he is doing a good job too. Care to mention another countries leader who has similar ?

That's a lot of fucking perverts there harry. When the perverts outnumber the rest, who are the perverts?

It seems the Ukrainians, who were "promised" so much from the Ameristanis and EU politicians have received bad news.

Juncker Says Ukraine Not Likely To Join EU, NATO For 20-25 Years

Juncker Says Ukraine Not Likely To Join EU, NATO For 20-25 Years

In-Depth Coverage
March 04, 2016
It will take Ukraine at least 20 to 25 years to join the European Union and NATO, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said March 3.
'Ukraine will definitely not be able to become a member of the EU in the next 20 to 25 years, and not of NATO either,' he said in a speech at The Hague.
While Juncker did not explain why Ukraine would have to wait so long, his speech was aimed at reassuring Dutch voters that this year's free-trade agreement between Ukraine and the EU was not a first step toward quickly joining the European Union.

Normal diplomacy for Ameristni/EU unexceptional leaders these days and historically. You'd think those receiving the promises would doubt them by now.

Very shrewd move by Putin.. not a full withdrawal of course and could redeploy at short notice, but it's a proper fuck you to the Coalition forces and a media coup in the popularity stakes.

Quote:

---

"I consider the mission set for the defence ministry and the armed forces on the whole has been accomplished," Mr Putin said in a meeting at the Kremlin.

"I am therefore ordering the defence ministry to begin the withdrawal of the main part of our military force from the Syrian Arab Republic from tomorrow."

Syria conflict: Russia's Putin orders 'main part' of forces out - BBC News

---

Quote:

---

Analysis by Jonathan Marcus, BBC diplomatic correspondent

Mr Putin is effectively saying "job done" in Syria. He is clear, though, that a Russian air base and a naval base will remain, so this is not a total military pull-out.

Coinciding with the Syria peace talks, it is yet another sign of Mr Putin's mastery of diplomatic showmanship.

Russia has about 30 combat aircraft in Syria and a small ground component protecting them, along with an unspecified number of Russian advisers and special forces on the ground, operating with the Syrian military.

Russia's intervention has achieved its main goals - consolidating President Assad's position, enabling his forces to re-take key pieces of strategic territory and ensuring that Mr Assad remains a factor in any future Syrian settlement.

---

What did Russia achieve in Syria?

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/717.jpg
Image copyright AP

• Russian aircraft flew more than 9,000 sorties
• Destroyed 209 oil production and transfer facilities
• Helped Syrian government troops to retake 400 settlements
• Helped Damascus to regain control over more than 10,000 sq km (3,860 sq miles) of territory

Source: Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, quoted by Russian media

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

What did Russia achieve in Syria?

---

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/724.jpg

:rofl:

^ You must be a colonial.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

Very shrewd move by Putin.. not a full withdrawal of course and could redeploy at short notice, but it's a proper fuck you to the Coalition forces and a media coup in the popularity stakes.

---

Agreed, the announcement of the "start" of military withdrawals puts pressure on the negotiators to agree on items. It will also allow the crusader coalition to clean up their own mess, show how pitiful their efforts are, when on their own.

So, two cooks at the airforce base fighting to be the "start" of the military withdrawal.


It could of course been forced by the alleged shooting down of a Syrian jet by a missile.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

What did Russia achieve in Syria?

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/717.jpg
Image copyright AP

• Russian aircraft flew more than 9,000 sorties
• Destroyed 209 oil production and transfer facilities
• Helped Syrian government troops to retake 400 settlements
• Helped Damascus to regain control over more than 10,000 sq km (3,860 sq miles) of territory

Source: Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, quoted by Russian media

---

Alternatively, he knows that, like Afghanistan, he's fighting a war he cannot win and is making a tactical withdrawal while he can still do it with some measure of dignity.

If he's played his part in starting peace talks, fair play.

But if he keeps supporting Assad at all costs, it will all have been a waste of time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

But if he keeps supporting Assad at all costs, it will all have been a waste of time.

---

The LORD has said many times, it is not the person, but the office the person holds, he has also said he wishes the sovereign country of Syria to remain intact. Of the two I suggest it's the second that is more of a problem. But let us see what the Syrians want, not the crusader coalition, their vassals and paid assassins.

Assad himself has said he holds his office at the request of the Syrian people. Presumably he will let go the position when informed of the Syrian's decision.

Or "probably" Tusk has offered him dual citizenship and the Ameristani VP position + a few kilos of gold. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Assad himself has said he holds his office at the request of the Syrian people. Presumably he will let go the position when informed of the Syrian's decision.

---

Are you still clinging to the absurd notion that Assad was fairly elected by the majority of Syrians?

And I suppose Kim Jong Un also gets as many free and fair votes as he says.

Why are you conspiracy knobs always so spectacularly stupid?

:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

that Assad was fairly elected by the majority of Syrians?

---

I assume all governments are fairly elected Harry, should there be some I should worry about? How does one judge which ones are the truth and which ones have been falsified to serve the evil .............

Or all of them? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

What did Russia achieve in Syria?

• Russian aircraft flew more than 9,000 sorties
• Destroyed 209 oil production and transfer facilities
• Helped Syrian government troops to retake 400 settlements
• Helped Damascus to regain control over more than 10,000 sq km (3,860 sq miles) of territory

Source: Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, quoted by Russian media

---

If he's played his part in starting peace talks, fair play.

---

It's a bitter pill for you I know Harry... but actually I put the post up to highlight the damage inflicted on the illicit oil trade which has been fueling this conflict. The revenue has dried up, the party over, there's no point IS holding ground if there's nothing to get out of it. Of course we know about US/UK/NATO complicity, and this highlights their shortcomings... why didn't the billions of tax payers £/$'s achieve the same result, unless the Coalition are a) really very inept, or b) they lied to their populace about the real objectives in Syria... politically it's a very savvy move by Putin.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

that Assad was fairly elected by the majority of Syrians?

---

I assume all governments are fairly elected Harry, should there be some I should worry about? How does one judge which ones are the truth and which ones have been falsified to serve the evil .............

Or all of them? :)

---

It's not difficult.

Well, maybe it is for you.

Allegedly the Russian economy is just fine with the LORDS management. Long live the crusader coalitions sanctions.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1010.jpg



"Perfectly bottom-ticking the Russia stock market in March 2014, The White House's Jay Carney suggested investors "not invest in Russian equities right now." Since then MICEX has soared 55% to fresh 8-year highs (closing in on record highs) and is the best-forming asset since the March 2009 lows.
In March 2014...

Carney warns of impact on Russian stock market. "If I were you, I wouldn't invest in Russian equities right now."
— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) March 18, 2014

Which was followed by a 55% surge to fresh 8 year highs..."


Russian Stocks Hit 8 Year High - Up 55% Since White House Said "Sell" | Zero Hedge

The LORD has committed another crime. :rolleyes:

This time he is threatening to hang somebody if his bridge to Crimea is not finished in time. Looks like he expects all Russians to take responsibility for their tasks.

From the celebrations marking the anniversary of Crimea's return to Russia.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1011.jpg


"[The bridge] will be yet another symbol of our unity," Putin said in a televised address, after congratulating the country on the annexation. "We will confidently move forward together, and only forward," he promised. Yes, "forward and only forward." That is of course unless someone forgets to build the road that will link the bridge to Crimea’s capital, Simferopol. "Officials keep passing responsibility for the work to colleagues in different ministries," Bloomberg writes. And Putin isn't happy about it. In fact, if winter of 2018 rolls around and the road isn't built, he's going to "hang" someone - he just needs to know who it's going to be.
"There should be a specific person who can be hanged if it’s not done," he said on Friday. "A specific entity, a specific person responsible for the whole project is needed, so I wouldn’t have to call all government phones or regions."


Putin Looks For "Someone To Hang" In Case Road To Crimea Bridge Isn't Finished On Time | Zero Hedge

Allegedly the Syrian advertising campaign is paying off. Not only politically but financially. the immediate cost has been taken from the Russian forces "education and Training" budget so no new spend.

However due to the political success and the overwhelming military success many countries are lining up to but "MADE IN RUSSIA" arms. It seems the political back-down/ineffectiveness of crusader coalition military tactics/equipment has been highlighted by the P4+1 coalition. Orders for planes, helicopters, training and missiles are now being completed.

"The $500 million Russia spent on the military operation in Syria may soon pay off for the Kremlin, reports business daily Kommersant, as Moscow expects $6-7 billion worth of new arms contracts. "

https://www.rt.com/business/337404-r...yria-campaign/

Did anybody notice the sanctions? If so they did a Nelson on them.

Some British MSM seem to have the hots for Russians as well. For a while now the comments pages in the "quality" news sources have reflected the pro Russian feeling. Now it's the red tops changing horses.

It seems the tide has changed.

British Papers, Readers Pay Tribute to Russian Hero Who Sacrificed Himself Against ISIS

Even a request from an USA victims family can't pursuade the Ameristani government to release the alleged evidence they have which they are convinced proves Russia's involvement in the UKraine jet crash.

How pitiful to see Ameristani politicians squirm.

"American-Dutch citizen Quinn Schansman, asked Kerry to turn over that data to aid the investigation seeking to identify who was responsible for shooting down the plane on July 17, 2014. In a letter dated March 7, 2016, but just delivered to Thomas Schansman on Thursday, Kerry expressed his condolences and repeated his claim to know where the missile launch originated, but did not provide new details.

Kerry wrote, “The assessment I provided to the media three days following the shoot down remains unchanged, and is corroborated by the findings of the Dutch Safety Board [DSB]. Flight 17 was shot down by a BUK surface-to-air missile fired from separatist-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine.”

http://russia-insider.com/en/kerry-b...7-data/ri13610

But Kerry’s assertion is not entirely correct. Despite Kerry’s claim on July 20, 2014 – three days after the shoot-down – to know the location of the missile launch, the Dutch Safety Board reported last October that it could only place the likely launch site within a 320-square-kilometer area that included territory under both government and rebel control. (The safety board did not seek to identify which side fired the fateful missile).

Why the U.S. government has dragged its heels about supplying the evidence that Kerry claimed to possess just days after the tragedy has become a secondary mystery to the allegations and counter-allegations about whodunit. That Kerry would not even elaborate on that information in response to the father of the lone American victim is even more striking."


Kerry's claim that his information corroborated is a lie. He refuses to back up his allegation with any proof.




"Something is rotten in the state of DC"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Even a request from an USA victims family can't pursuade the Ameristani government to release the alleged evidence they have which they are convinced proves Russia's involvement in the UKraine jet crash.

How pitiful to see Ameristani politicians squirm.

"American-Dutch citizen Quinn Schansman, asked Kerry to turn over that data to aid the investigation seeking to identify who was responsible for shooting down the plane on July 17, 2014. In a letter dated March 7, 2016, but just delivered to Thomas Schansman on Thursday, Kerry expressed his condolences and repeated his claim to know where the missile launch originated, but did not provide new details.

Kerry wrote, “The assessment I provided to the media three days following the shoot down remains unchanged, and is corroborated by the findings of the Dutch Safety Board [DSB]. Flight 17 was shot down by a BUK surface-to-air missile fired from separatist-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine.”

Kerry Rebuffs Request to Supply Key MH17 Data to Family of American Victim

But Kerry’s assertion is not entirely correct. Despite Kerry’s claim on July 20, 2014 – three days after the shoot-down – to know the location of the missile launch, the Dutch Safety Board reported last October that it could only place the likely launch site within a 320-square-kilometer area that included territory under both government and rebel control. (The safety board did not seek to identify which side fired the fateful missile).

Why the U.S. government has dragged its heels about supplying the evidence that Kerry claimed to possess just days after the tragedy has become a secondary mystery to the allegations and counter-allegations about whodunit. That Kerry would not even elaborate on that information in response to the father of the lone American victim is even more striking."


Kerry's claim that his information corroborated is a lie. He refuses to back up his allegation with any proof.




"Something is rotten in the state of DC"

---

Are you a bit thick?

You don't tell your enemies how good your radar and satellite is.

:smileylaughing:

You think that the US's enemies don't know how accurate those satellites are..?

:smileylaughing:

Jeez Harry... the US gov themselves are quite open about the technology they possess.. you'd have to have your head right in the sand to have missed it. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Are you a bit thick? You don't tell your enemies how good your radar and satellite is.

---

Assuming the Russians are too thick to discover a technical spec. on one of Cliteries servers eh, harry

It's not the technology it's the lying politicians which is my point here, harry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Are you a bit thick? You don't tell your enemies how good your radar and satellite is.

---

Assuming the Russians are too thick to discover a technical spec. on one of Cliteries servers eh, harry

It's not the technology it's the lying politicians which is my point here, harry.

---

It is about the technology.

What do you think all those private shuttle and Titan launches have been for over the years?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

What do you think all those private shuttle and Titan launches have been for over the years?

---

The number of a countries launches is of concern only if it one of the brown or yellow citizens countries. get with the FEAR programme harry. Exceptional countries launching satellites or partly returnable rockets are outside the normal alarmist public media.

As such, harry, I am not aware of the numbers, or payloads, of any of the "exceptional" or otherwise countries launches. Equally I am not privy to the technological lead, or otherwise, of individual countries. Probably, all Ameristani launches are to assist the Ameristani Agriculture Government Department and only measure temp and crop development status.
:rolleyes:

Pray tell us all which country is No.1 for all the technologies required for all such activities. Pray tell who supplies who with rocket motors or space cameras etc. for example.

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

What do you think all those private shuttle and Titan launches have been for over the years?

---

The number of a countries launches is of concern only if it one of the brown or yellow citizens countries. get with the FEAR programme harry. Exceptional countries launching satellites or partly returnable rockets are outside the normal alarmist public media.

As such, harry, I am not aware of the numbers, or payloads, of any of the "exceptional" or otherwise countries launches. Equally I am not privy to the technological lead, or otherwise, of individual countries. Probably, all Ameristani launches are to assist the Ameristani Agriculture Government Department and only measure temp and crop development status.
:rolleyes:

Pray tell us all which country is No.1 for all the technologies required for all such activities. Pray tell who supplies who with rocket motors or space cameras etc. for example.

:)

---

Ask a simple question.

Get complete gibberish as an answer.

:rolleyes:

Just reading your posts gets my juices flowing.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1511.jpg

Careful, Harry. I think he likes you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Just reading your posts gets my juices flowing.

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1511.jpg

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

What do you think all those private shuttle and Titan launches have been for over the years?

---

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1537.jpg:smileylaughing:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

What do you think all those private shuttle and Titan launches have been for over the years?

---

https://teakdoor.com/images/imported/2016/03/1537.jpg:smileylaughing:

---

Are you saying there weren't any?

^Are you implying you know what was in/on them and their capabilities? If so please inform us slavering imbeciles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

^Are you implying you know what was in/on them and their capabilities? If so please inform us slavering imbeciles.

---

Hmmmm wild guess at what the US military sends up to space on rockets and shuttles.


Elephants? No, too big.

Daffodils? Too much watering.

Spy Satellites?

I think we have a winner.

:chitown:

My GPS is working fine ! And yours ?
Thank You Uncle Sam.
Because those dumb Europeans can't find their ass... ahemm Galileo. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

My GPS is working fine ! And yours ? Thank You Uncle Sam

---

:rofl:

Praise the Nazi rocket makers, the Russian satellite pioneers, the Iranian mathematicians and the Chinese chemists.

Tried the Russian or Chinese satellite feeds, more or less accurate than "Uncle Sam's", g of gold per kg to station, life expectancy, g of gold initial satellite cost, effectiveness?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Spy Satellites? I think we have a winner.

---

Well that's a relief. Putting 1960's overpriced, overweight technology, probably using Russian rocket engines and sporting digital cameras using chips designed by foreigners, who never sell to other countries unless they have families threatened, their biggest, best or brightest "commodities".

Here's me thinking you were a satellite imagery specialist. Or know anything about what you're continually posting.

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OhOh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HermantheGerman

My GPS is working fine ! And yours ? Thank You Uncle Sam

---

:rofl:

Praise the Nazi rocket makers, the Russian satellite pioneers, the Iranian mathematicians and the Chinese chemists.

Tried the Russian or Chinese satellite feeds, more or less accurate than "Uncle Sam's", g of gold per kg to station, life expectancy, g of gold initial satellite cost, effectiveness?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Spy Satellites? I think we have a winner.

---

Well that's a relief. Putting 1960's overpriced, overweight technology, probably using Russian rocket engines and sporting digital cameras using chips designed by foreigners, who never sell to other countries unless they have families threatened, their biggest, best or brightest "commodities".

Here's me thinking you were a satellite imagery specialist. Or know anything about what you're continually posting.

:)

---

Ruh Roh ENT's off on one of his waffles again.

:smileylaughing: