He's out of control, Putin controlled the American elections to elect Trump.
His power knows no bounds.
Printable View
He's out of control, Putin controlled the American elections to elect Trump.
His power knows no bounds.
Oh My God, ^ we are all doomed Ruskies are brighter than our secret services who claim to protect us from bad Ruskie.
^ What inspired you to start posting in SC? You never did so before Drumpf was elected. Just curious.
I didn't notice before that it was the SPeakers corner but thanks for pointing it out.
The reason why I have started posting about Trump after the election results is this, I'm having fun, it's unreal how different this election was to all those before.
I was neutral upto the election date, mainly through the BBC propaganda machine that for 6 months constantly told Me not to care about the results of this election because the Democratics have it essentially sown up with a Hillary victory.
So I obeyed the BBC and chilled out already knowing the forgone result.
As we know it didn't turn out like the BBC said it should.
So it's very amusing for Me to enjoy writing about how Trump is so good and is going to do well.
Because the same BBC is still telling folks that DT is a calamity.
I am enjoying it all.
Wooooopy go Trump go, Man of the year. Ye ye ye, I love you ye ye ye.
Putin Named ‘Most Powerful’ for Fourth Straight Year
The world's most powerful person for four years running, Russia's president has exerted his country's influence in nearly every corner of the globe; from the motherland to Syria to the U.S. presidential elections, Putin continues to get what he wants. Unconstrained by conventional global norms, his reach has magnified in recent years. In 2016 Russian hackers were accused of tapping into email accounts owned by members of the U.S. Democratic Party in a bid to aid the campaign of Donald Trump, who has regularly praised Putin's leadership style. The Kremlin denies the charges, and President-elect Trump has also dismissed the possibility of outsiders tampering in the election, despite a reported CIA memo suggesting otherwise. Either way, with a likely ally entering the White House, Putin's power may go largely unchecked for years to come.
more
Forbes Welcome
Putin my hero !!! we all love you, come to liberate us :)
Poor old seppos finding it a bit hard to come to terms with that Vlad now owns them.
well at least I am not worshiping an old witch who cowardly murder children with drones strikes at 10,000 feet in the airQuote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
Amazing that they aren't taking this more seriously.
Or have the Russians already got so much dirt on them that they are afraid to?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/us...-dnc.html?_r=0
nice story... but harry you like to think yourself a bit of a cyber buff, I've trawled through all these stories about the Russians hacking Shilary and it all boils down to speculation. the fact that there is a russian 'fingerprint' in some of the electronic script makes it just as likely as not that it wasn't the russians at all... and anyway wtf.. shilary is corrupt and this is the spin, its not about her its about those damn russians and you're helping to propagate the lie.
If you read the article it's more than just a few artifacts. The evidence is damning, and 17 US intelligence agencies, who presumably have information to which we are not privy, have stated that Russia was behind the hacking.
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
If nothing else it merits the sort of attention Benghazi got, don't you think?
they all copy the flawed evidence on each other, like low skills cheating students :)Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
Ah, yes. The old "they presumably have information to which we are not privy" gambit. I remember that well leading up to war with Iraq's and Iraq's alleged WMDs that didn't exist. So much for British and US "intelligence" and the evidence people presumed they had - but did not.
and yet idiots like Harry still fall for the same trick :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverna
god, people are dumb :)
No one cares about Hillary any more, she lost, she's gone, out of it, why do you insist on constantly bringing her up? Why would they try to spin a story to distract from Hillary when no one's talking about Hillary? There's nothing to distract from.
YOU'RE using HER as a spin to distract from the Russian hacking.
As someone noted, no one is claiming that it had a direct effect on the election.
What people are really concerned about is that the Russians in a brazenly aggressive way interfered in U.S. politics and the President Elect is not at all interested.
Did you know they also hacked the Republican party but whatever they found they are keeping to themselves. Have they got something on Trump? Will he be in power only as long as the Russians allow him? Will he be required to do their bidding?
Why aren't you lot taking this more seriously?
I do not know the veracity of your figure "17 intelligence agencies", seeing as no Link was provided. But it leads to an obvious question- why the hell have 17 intelligence agencies? I'll leave that with the US taxpayer. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by harrybarracuda
But I do know one thing- not one single thread of hard evidence has been provided, besides hearsay, and as best I am aware, almost all of these allegations have come from 'un-named sources'. Whereas the Hillary Emails are in hard copy- black and white. Furthermore an individual who was willing to name himself- one Julian Assange- specifically stated that the leaked Emails were not the work of the Russian government. On record.
Maybe you think you can trust our government(s) because, y'know, we are the good guys- and Russia, obviously, the bad guys. I mean, our governments constantly tell us that all the time- so it must be right h'mmm? But I certainly can't, not after Iraq, Iran, Syria, 911- etc etc.
I am not going to make a case for my government being good guys but can you make a case for the Russians not being bad guys? It seems that many of you regulars in this thread spend a lot of time putting Russia on a pedestal. What is the motivating factor in doing that? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by sabang
They should have just contacted you in the first place for your analysis. Saved them a lot of time .:rofl::rofl::rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Neo
Yeah, cowardly Putin has barrel bombs for his indiscriminate murder by air campaigns. Much more in the Stalin tradition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonfly
His triggerman Assad used them, are you denying it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverna
He doesn't need them he has far more deadly munitions deployed in Syria. He turned Aleppo into glass.Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverna
Russia- corrupt, been through a hard time economically, an aging military- but still by no means paltry (and nuclear armed), no longer a Communist country- more like a crony capitalist country. Hasn't invaded anyone in recent history, but I really think it is stupid to provoke it on it's own doorstep, or try to overthrow it's close allies because of a damn oil pipeline (you don't actually believe the 'human rights' story do you?)- plus of course to tweak the nose of the Russian bear. Putin is a classic strongman, who is no doubt behind the deaths of several political enemies and dissidents- but he remains popular in Russia, to a degree our western leaders can only dream about.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
I hardly think that is putting Russia, or Putin, on a pedestal. Neither do I think the following is-
1- I think Nato's headlong expansionism towards Russra's borders (against previous solemn promises made by the USA) is both reckless and irresponsible- and harmful to the interests of your European allies.
2- I think our involvement in the Ukrainian coup' was very reckless and irresponsible, and furthermore think Putin's subsequent reunification of Crimea with Russia (following a crushing referendum victory), only made sense under the circumstance.
3- I support Putin's campaign against the mainly foreign Islamic militant rebels in Syria- it is not him fighting the Kurds for example, it is our 'close ally' Turkey.
4- Unless needlessly provoked, I do not believe Russia poses a tangible threat to Europe or the west in general. Indeed, Russia is the EU's dominant supplier of energy- and in turn, the EU is Russia's largest foreign investor. So just exactly what is the US playing at?
It's called the right of reply, an old fashioned concept when things were discussed fully prior to enacting any further measures. We are now witnessing the explosion of "fake news" rightly being highlighted for all to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
Nobody, other than "Tongue in cheek" me, has claimed any other position for The LORD, known as President Putin to some.
The accepted western view is and was that he and his friends views were somewhat dangerous and only the god loving Ameristani view was correct. Millions have been murdered, millions have had their lives ruined by the current mind set that might is right and it's my way or the highway.
Your tall tree has been rotting inside for decades, it's now apparent to all.
It's a known fact that The LORD is a piss poor helicopter pilot. He couldn't hit a hill side if he tried. He does know his way around a hot Kamchatka though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Humbert
The facts are somewhat different in the real world.Quote:
Originally Posted by bsnub
If true, Aleppo city is what 500 sq km, how many millions of sq kms has the crusader coalition glassed, ionised, polluted and made unfit for human habitation during their empires reigns?
No problems the Chinese will just extend the Cinderella portion of the new Aleppo theme park.
The use of bombs in war- I mean, what is the world coming to. Us good guys would never do that, would we? I was going to ask the Mayor of Hiroshima, but he appears to have evaporated.
Humberq and snub, dumb and dumber :)
Before, you said Putin has them and suggested he had used them. When I ask you for evidence for that, you change and say Assad has them. So, no evidence that Putin has them or has used them. As I thought. Humbert = wrong.
:smileylaughing:
straight over the top of your head, but in your defence; it is a very deep hole you're trying to dig yourself out of :)