Thread: 2016 Democratic US Presidential Candidates

Originally Posted by misskit

^I refer to post 4017. Are you saying all those people who had praise for Clinton are liars?

I have no idea , the whole point is there should be no question marks as to the integrity or credibility of a presidential candidate , sorrily for Hilarious there existence is quite stark and glaring, Billy blow job was found innocent of perjury by a majority in Congress or whatever you call it about the Lewinsky scandal , does that REALLY prove anything ?

Originally Posted by misskit

^^ You and RPeter need to stop using opinion pieces, blogs, and videos when you are offering no opinion yourselves. Insisting other posters comment on the opinion of writers or video makers not participating on this forum over and over is asinine.

So inserting pieces,either wideo or written, to expose the Clinton's life long corruption is pointless, I don't think so. You need to address the points of what I put up not the source, if there are fallacies in the posts show me.

Originally Posted by misskit

^^ You and RPeter need to stop using opinion pieces, blogs, and videos when you are offering no opinion yourselves. Insisting other posters comment on the opinion of writers or video makers not participating on this forum over and over is asinine.

I insist on nothing if one chooses to ignore the bad side of the Clintons that is up to them, but don't try to sell a load of crap before you look at both sides. I post up pieces and videos that may be somewhat disputable so if you have evidence that disputes them post it up, but don't try to tell me what not to post.

Originally Posted by misskit

^ Those are opinion pieces, not news articles. Look where it says OPINION at the top of the item.

That means it is the OPINION of a writer. Not gospel. Not news. An OPINION.

But if I agree with the opinion of the writer I will post it, if you wish to dispute have at it, I never complain about what you post, however I quite frequently disagree.

Originally Posted by misskit

Or else I will hound you

it is best to just stop replying to him

Originally Posted by misskit

^ It is all true. Exactly the same. Now rebut.

I insist. Or else I will hound you in endless posts as you do others.

Get it?

What is there to rebut?

^^ The rules say to state YOUR opinion on the subject. In this case 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidates.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by misskit

^^ You and RPeter need to stop using opinion pieces, blogs, and videos when you are offering no opinion yourselves. Insisting other posters comment on the opinion of writers or video makers not participating on this forum over and over is asinine.

So inserting pieces,either wideo or written, to expose the Clinton's life long corruption is pointless, I don't think so. You need to address the points of what I put up not the source, if there are fallacies in the posts show me.

Par the course I'm afraid RP , ALWAY'S attack the messenger and not the message

Always amazes me that idiots like Peter keep posting. The unbroken string of reds should be an indicator, even to the terminally thick, that everyone hates you and nobody values your opinion.

And yet they just keep on blathering...day after day.

Which is why I rarely bother with the political threads.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas.

Tinfoil conspiracy theories for weak minded lemmings like yourself. If there was any truth to it the repubtards would have strung the Clintons up in the trees by now. You are a gullible old fool.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Thanks for once again taking my words and repeating them back to me you brainwashed lemming.

Why don't you post something to refute these tin foil conspiracies rather than just stating your opinion.Oh wait because you can't.

Originally Posted by misskit

^^ The rules say to state YOUR opinion on the subject. In this case 2016 Democratic Presidential Candidates.

I would have thought that both RP and I saying that Hilarious is as crooked as a corkscrew qualifies us both as giving our opinions as to her credibility to be a Presidential candidate

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Hence why I said hiding behind a shield. Maybe you should research some videos of people very close to the Clintons during their days in Arkansas.

Tinfoil conspiracy theories for weak minded lemmings like yourself. If there was any truth to it the repubtards would have strung the Clintons up in the trees by now. You are a gullible old fool.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Oh wait I remember you saying you would read nothing that might sway you against what your masters have crammed into your head, so never mind you just keep living in your bubble.

Thanks for once again taking my words and repeating them back to me you brainwashed lemming.

Why don't you post something to refute these tin foil conspiracies rather than just stating your opinion.Oh wait because you can't.

He's far too busy thinking up new insulting words to fire at you

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Why don't you post something to refute these tin foil conspiracies rather than just stating your opinion.Oh wait because you can't.

Because they are baseless allegations you nitwit. Like I said before Ken Starr (a Republican) was assigned as a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton. He found no credible evidence to file any charges.

The sources you post have no credibility and that is of critical importance. You dont seem to think so and that shows that you are simply finding blogs on the internet that tell you what you want to hear regardless of whether there is a shred of proof. Facts don't matter to you. Once again you have completely derailed another thread.

Originally Posted by piwanoi

He's far too busy thinking up new insulting words to fire at you

Why you were ever allowed back into SC I will never know.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

if you disagree or have proof the posts are nor factual,post it up

Because it has already been debunked countless times over. It is no longer even an issue. Only paranoid conspiracy theorists push this nonsense. Just like chems trail and secret government programs to control the weather. It all on those sites you read.

Go start a thread about it and you and piwianoy can bleat on to your hearts contempt. Stop derailing this thread.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

at one time I thought you to be a pretty level headed poster, sorry to say I just lost a great deal of respect for you.

I'm crushed......

I, for one, think Hillary is not worthy to be president. She spins the truth more than her so called husband. Snub, don't bother replying since I already know how you feel by sending me the red, you demotard dick.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

if you disagree or have proof the posts are nor factual,post it up

Because it has already been debunked countless times over. It is no longer even an issue. Only paranoid conspiracy theorists push this nonsense. Just like chems trail and secret government programs to control the weather. It all on those sites you read.

Go start a thread about it and you and piwianoy can bleat on to your hearts contempt. Stop derailing this thread.

What has been debunked? Hillary signing off on selling uranium to Russia after Bill gets a $500,000 dollar payday from the same co. In Russia. Hillary kicking out the travel agency at the White House to give their buddies the job, then being forced to reinstate the former agency, Bill pardoning their drug dealing buddiesthe dissapearance and recovery of the Rose law firm scandles, which of the many scandles have been debunked Snubbles?

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

if you disagree or have proof the posts are nor factual,post it up

Because it has already been debunked countless times over. It is no longer even an issue. Only paranoid conspiracy theorists push this nonsense. Just like chems trail and secret government programs to control the weather. It all on those sites you read.

Go start a thread about it and you and piwianoy can bleat on to your hearts contempt. Stop derailing this thread.

What has been debunked? Hillary signing off on selling uranium to Russia after Bill gets a $500,000 dollar payday from the same co. In Russia. Hillary kicking out the travel agency at the White House to give their buddies the job, then being forced to reinstate the former agency, Bill pardoning their drug dealing buddiesthe dissapearance and recovery of the Rose law firm scandles, which of the many scandles have been debunked Snubbles?

I detect the distinct odour of another red on the way

Originally Posted by piwanoi

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

if you disagree or have proof the posts are nor factual,post it up

Because it has already been debunked countless times over. It is no longer even an issue. Only paranoid conspiracy theorists push this nonsense. Just like chems trail and secret government programs to control the weather. It all on those sites you read.

Go start a thread about it and you and piwianoy can bleat on to your hearts contempt. Stop derailing this thread.

Ahh that's it now appealing to the Mods is it , has the penny not dropped yet as to just why I have not posted one single thing untoward against Bernie Sanders? , cos unlike you I am not Across the board against the Dems as you are against the republicans , only against Hilarious being a suitable candidate for her party not quite sure here but I think the same goes for RP.

You are right although I don't think America is ready for a socialist president, to many people who love their freedom.you also have to realize in the minds of Harry and Snubbles if you oppose one democratic point then you give 100%support to the Republicans in their minds there is no such thing as an independent.

Originally Posted by RPETER65

You are right although I don't think America is ready for a socialist president, to many people who love their freedom.

Clearly those same Americans don't understand the term "socialist" in the context of Sanders.

Originally Posted by bsnub

Originally Posted by RPETER65

Why don't you post something to refute these tin foil conspiracies rather than just stating your opinion.Oh wait because you can't.

Because they are baseless allegations you nitwit. Like I said before Ken Starr (a Republican) was assigned as a special prosecutor to investigate Clinton. He found no credible evidence to file any charges.

The sources you post have no credibility and that is of critical importance. You dont seem to think so and that shows that you are simply finding blogs on the internet that tell you what you want to hear regardless of whether there is a shred of proof. Facts don't matter to you. Once again you have completely derailed another thread.

Originally Posted by piwanoi

He's far too busy thinking up new insulting words to fire at you

Why you were ever allowed back into SC I will never know.

The sources credibility will be in the facts or non facts of there videos or articles, something you continually avoid, why do you refuse to address the issues point by point?