^^That's a fascinating article. Someone sent it to me about an hour ago. If the assumptions are correct by and large, and if her health holds (which I think is a big IF), she is looking very strong.
^^That's a fascinating article. Someone sent it to me about an hour ago. If the assumptions are correct by and large, and if her health holds (which I think is a big IF), she is looking very strong.
^
OK, but what has she accomplished?![]()
Unfortunately, that's not the point. The same bleating flocks that brought Obama in based on nothing other than his being a half-black guy who could shout "Change" over and over will bring her in based on name recognition, the fact that there are no other viable candidates, and the fact she is allegedly female. If you read the article, it makes some very good points - not on why she SHOULD be elected, but on why she WILL be.
Mrs. Clinton has them shaking in their boots, three years out.
The Chairman of the Republican National Committee, Reince Priebus, has sent letters to CNN and NBC asking them to cancel planned programming about former First Lady, U.S. Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Priebus says that if the programs are not canceled, he will recommend that the RNC not partner with NBC News or CNN for primary debates once the 2016 election season begins.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.
^
OK, she's got 'em 'shaking in their boots' but what has she accomplished to be considered a viable candidate for the highest office in the land?
Honest question that keeps getting ignored.
What has she done on her own accord?
"Hillary has never been a great politician, given a moving speech, or had a compelling message. Pretty much her only qualifications are 1) that she's married to Bill Clinton and 2) hated by the Right."
Last edited by Boon Mee; 06-08-2013 at 07:23 AM.
Same honest answer from me. It doesn't matter. The media decided you folks needed a sort-of-black President, so you got one (and oh how well that's worked out). The media will now decide it's time for a sort-of-female President, and you'll get Billary. The Republicans have nobody. The media will decide (and has got the flock pretty well prepped already). Voters will bleat, and Bingo - eight years of Billary - which is what they deserve.
Why not go again for SARAH PALIN ?????
She has a great record on top of it.
Politician, commentator and author who served as Governor of Alaska,
what more do you want?
And she has of course the name recognition you are looking for.
Let's all vote for SARAH PALIN !!!!!
There used to be a time that several members of this forum adored she.... but perhaps did they changed their opinions by now.
PALIN, PALIN, PALIN![]()
Jindal wouldn't even win his own state.
Second-term Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal is occasionally mentioned as a presidential contender in 2016, but he has some work to do back home first. He is deeply unpopular two years after he was re-elected over token opposition. Only 35 percent of respondents view Jindal favorably, versus 51 percent who view him unfavorably. In a hypothetical 2016 presidential matchup, respondents in our poll picked Hillary Clinton over Jindal, 44 to 42 percent.
BM with his finger on the pulse of America
Looking ahead to the 2016 presidential election, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to lead potential Republican challengers among Virginia voters, topping New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie 46 percent to 37 percent and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz 53 percent to 34 percent.
Clinton crushes Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas 53 - 34 percent. Biden tops Cruz 47 - 37 percent.
at 2:02, eating with only one chopstick
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)