Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

^ good find.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

2 separate vans. The van with the mural on was the one reported to have been the one with Palestinian terrorists in, filled with explosives. The second van was the one with the dancing Israelis in which was, admitted by them, documenting the event.

Now we have collusion between the Israelites and the Palestinians, in vans, while the actual event was in the air. Did your 'report' indicate the purpose of these two vans, and the people in them, and the explosives, and why highly trained Mossad agents might be instructed to openly cheer or did they get carried away? Does any of this reconcile with the 'inside job' theory, inside generally meaning with the Bush admin being in on it, now with the Israelites and Palestinians, and it was all covered up?

Right, are we now up to speed?

You clearly are, and need to slow down a bit.

Probably forgot his meds.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Probably forgot his meds.

No Hairy, as always, I take them with a cuppa first thing in the morning.

Originally Posted by jabir

Now we have collusion between the Israelites and the Palestinians,

Slight misunderstanding there. Prag is referring to the Israeli van that was going to be blamed on Palestinians.
I don't have an opinion on that. The premise has credibility, but it is speculation.
And it has to be speculation unless the arrested Israeli suspects admitted to it.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

If you listen to the police radio calls you will hear the officers describing the van with a mural of a plane, on its side, flying into the twin towers.

did they find the catapult ?

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Also the van they used tested positive for having had explosives in it.

in america , guns - this is diabolical and obviously covered up

of course it wasnt a plane, only a nutter like Harry could believe in such a lie

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Still working Harry?

A must watch 46 minute speech by an engineer who looked at the data recorder of the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon. Really informative.

Gullible Nutter Harry Alert !!!

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

A must watch 46 minute speech by an engineer who looked at the data recorder of the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon. Really informative.

It boggles the mind that such compelling evidence...lets call it compelling supposition and hypothesis..has not spurred more questions.
Is it time for a group to take all the evidence to the ICC? At the very least it would spur discussion and a general viewing of the evidence as it stands.

Come on Hairy, watch the video. You may just learn something.

I've already learned Dennis is a moron, which is why the discussions where his bollocks are ripped asunder have been removed from the t'interwebnet by the whackjobs that inadvertently hosted them.

Suffice to say that he's not an "expert" in flight data recorders any more than TD's whackjobs are "seismologists", "architects", "engineers" or any of the other things to which they claim expertise when spouting 9/11 fairytales.

Not only does he not know how they work, but he doesn't know what the contents mean either.

Unfortunately, every plausible-sounding youtube idiot is a forum flame for TD's resident whackjob moths.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

I've already learned Dennis is a moron

You have a YouTube link to that or I won't believe it.

Dennis Cimino, a credentialed Flight Data Recorder expert and pilot, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the data released by the NTSB, allegedly containing the data recovered from Flight 77 into the Pentagon’s FDR is 100% fraudulent. He explains everything in layman’s terms. 9/11 is a lie.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Suffice to say that he's not an "expert" in flight data recorders any more than TD's whackjobs are "seismologists", "architects", "engineers" or any of the other things to which they claim expertise

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

when spouting 9/11 fairytales.

Wise to add that qualification.
What do you claim expertise in, Harry? (Not mentioning 9/11 fairy tales, of course.)

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

You have a YouTube link to that or I won't believe it.

He says it himself: He had to ask someone how you get data off one.

Originally Posted by Maanaam

Wise to add that qualification.
What do you claim expertise in, Harry? (Not mentioning 9/11 fairy tales, of course.)

- in spotting a whackjob
- in avoiding attention seekers like yourself who's expertise is in boring the fucking tits off people

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

He says it himself: He had to ask someone how you get data off one.

I've looked but.................

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

I've looked but.................

It's not more than five or ten minutes in, because that time I felt embarrassed for him. Bit like baldy orange cunto in front of CPAC, they know they can come out with any old shite because the audience will lap it up.

So what is this Dennis Cimino guy actually saying ? Can you sum it up, Pragmatic ?