Thread: 9/11 was an inside job

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The trouble is the American people are so sick of listening to the sort of insane babbling you keep copying, they just don't give a fuck any more.

Harry, there are so many polls on this topic, even from MSM, and the figures are quite disappointing (for you).

Originally Posted by Klondyke

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

The trouble is the American people are so sick of listening to the sort of insane babbling you keep copying, they just don't give a fuck any more.

Harry, there are so many polls on this topic, even from MSM, and the figures are quite disappointing (for you).

You can get any skewed answer you want out of a poll just by asking a loaded question.

Pointless bullshit that they drag out every anniversary.

Originally Posted by jabir

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

in every ops, not everything goes to plan. Ok so they forgot to tie up some loose end, and suddenly that make them all innocent ?

if that's not black and white conservative thinking, then I don't know what is

Sorry to get involved, but by loose end do you mean a trivial oversight like forgetting to put eggs in the omelette?

they had the same loose end when they did the Iraq WMD case, didn't bother anybody

except conservative tards trying to be in denial about the whole thing, because you know, their government "would never lie to them"

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

No it didn't Albert,

right because you were there,

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yes it was Albert,

right because you were there,

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

it's quite obvious

right, because you were ....

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Sorry the truth hurts Albert, but you just look silly.

He does indeed, when he comes out with idiotic statements like this :

Originally Posted by Albert Shagnasty2017

Logic and critical thinking just aren't your thing.

HYPOCRITE ALERT ! Albert approaching !

As I have pointed out repeatedly and for a long time, Albert, you have never attempted any real analysis of the situation yourself; instead relying on statements like "it's clear that such and such a thing occurred", then posting links to some moronic website.

All you are doing is trying to keep alive the whole conspiracy thing, as well as this thread.

"Wind em up with any old argument, insult em a little and stand back" seems to be your motto.

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

No it didn't Albert,

right because you were there,

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Yes it was Albert,

right because you were there,

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

it's quite obvious

right, because you were ....

Buttplug to you refuse to believe anything happened because you weren't there?

Or is everything made up because a queer little "IT expert" like you wasn't there?

You witless turd.

Hey DF, I don't think Abraham Lincoln existed. Prove me wrong.

the point Harry is missing, as usual, was that he has no evidence whatsoever of his claims

it's not facts, it's his own opinion derived from gullible websites, and since his mental intellect is quite inferior (see his IT experts jokes), we can be sure that his opinions over this are complete garbage

none of you guys have any evidence of anything, and yet each side claim to know better or have the definite answer. You don't. All you do is post opinions of others, just because you like them better, or they fit your narrow little world better.

What is clear though and not debatable, is that the US government had the most to win from this, and clearly did. And they lied and covered up a few loose ends when they got caught in their little lies.

You retards think this is a Hollywood movie plot, where everything is executed perfectly, and if it's not executed perftecly, then it didn't happen

Originally Posted by redhaze

Hey DF, I don't think Abraham Lincoln existed. Prove me wrong.

what, you were there too ?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

the point Harry is missing, as usual, was that he has no evidence whatsoever of his claims

The point the "IT Expert" is missing is that fairy tales about imaginary drones and controlled demolitions are just that.

But the fat queer troll and the other lemmings believe it ONLY because it contradicts all of the evidence that was presented and considered in the 9/11 Commission Final Report.

Which of course the stupid fat queer has never even read.

(Not that he could, because he speaks English like my Bangladeshi gardener ).

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

in the 9/11 Commission Final Report.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

is that fairy tales about imaginary drones and controlled demolitions are just that

and yet you believe in fairy tales that a plane could hit the Pentagon

next, you are going to tell us that the Russians did it and you have seen the forensic

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

is that fairy tales about imaginary drones and controlled demolitions are just that

and yet you believe in fairy tales that a plane could hit the Pentagon

next, you are going to tell us that the Russians did it and you have seen the forensic

You should try reading the report Buttplug.

But you'd probably struggle getting past the white bit on the cover.

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

it collapsed assymetrically.

You fucking whackjobs can't agree on anything.

However, the professionals know what happened.

After 7 hours of uncontrolled fires, a steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.

That's got big words in it though, so I'm not surprised you whackies go for an easier theory.



P.S. I doubt you'll get past the cover page of this either.

http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/ge...?pub_id=861610

^

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

is that fairy tales about imaginary drones and controlled demolitions are just that

and yet you believe in fairy tales that a plane could hit the Pentagon

next, you are going to tell us that the Russians did it and you have seen the forensic

You should try reading the report Buttplug.

But you'd probably struggle getting past the white bit on the cover.

is that the censored one or did you have access to the full version ?

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

However, the professionals know what happened.

After 7 hours of uncontrolled fires, a steel girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to one of the 81 columns supporting the building. Floor 13 collapsed, beginning a cascade of floor failures to Floor 5. Column 79, no longer supported by a girder, buckled, triggering a rapid succession of structural failures that moved from east to west. All 23 central columns, followed by the exterior columns, failed in what's known as a "progressive collapse"--that is, local damage that spreads from one structural element to another, eventually resulting in the collapse of the entire structure.

That's got big words in it though, so I'm not surprised you whackies go for an easier theory.



P.S. I doubt you'll get past the cover page of this either.

http://ws680.nist.gov/publication/ge...?pub_id=861610

it's on the internet so it must be true

god, and you dare to make fun of the 911 whack jobs ? you are worse than they are

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You should try reading the report

Somewhat hypocritical of you Harry.

Originally Posted by redhaze

If their motive was to stage the 9/11 attack in order to go to war, why the fuck wouldn't they actually bother to pin the attack on the people they wanted to go to war with?

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

Ok so they forgot to tie up some loose end

This

Originally Posted by Dragonfly

What is clear though and not debatable, is that the US government had the most to win from this, and clearly did. And they lied and covered up a few loose ends when they got caught in their little lies.

That's true.

Sure they did. And some individuals subsequently also made a lot of money out of shorting the market.


The Israeli govt also had a lot to gain.

Originally Posted by Pragmatic

Originally Posted by harrybarracuda

You should try reading the report

Somewhat hypocritical of you Harry.

Why?

I learned how to read long words, so it's really quite easy.

Hardly my fault we have so many morons on here that struggle with a FOG index over 6 (or probably lower in Buttplug's case).